Summary
Small colonies of ants often produce mostly male alates, while large colonies produce mostly female alates. I present a simple model consistent with this pattern in which males that compete for mates are related (Local Mate Competition). The model explains the observed trend even when relatedness among competing males is low, so that there is only a negligible effect on the predicted sex allocation ratio in the population. The reverse trend is expected when there is competition among related females for a limited resource, such as nest sites (Local Resource Competition); small broods are predicted to be mostly female and large broods are predicted to be mostly male.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander RD, Sherman PW (1977) Local mate competition and parental investment in social insects. Science 196:494–500
Clark AB (1978) Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201:163–165
Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd ed Dover Press, New York
Frank SA (1985) Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. II. On applying the theory, and a test with fig wasps. Evolution 39:949–964
Frank SA (1986a) Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. I. General solutions for structured populations. Theor Pop Biol 29:312–342
Frank SA (1986b) The genetic value of sons and daughters. Heredity 56:351–354
Frank SA (1986c) Dispersal polymorphisms in subdivided populations. J Theor Biol 122:303–309
Frank SA (1987) Individual and population sex allocation patterns. Theor Popul Biol 31:47–74
Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488
Hamilton WD (1979) Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps in other insects. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Reproductive competition and sexual selection in insects. Academic, New York (pp 167–220)
Herbers JM (1984) Queen-worker conflict and eusocial evolution in a polygynous ant species. Evolution 38:631–643
Li CC (1976) A first course in population genetics. Boxwood, Pacific Grove, California
Nonacs P (1986) Ant reproductive stretegies and sex allocation theory. Q Rev Biol 61:1–21
Noonan KM (1979) Individual strategies of inclusive-fitness-maximizing in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1982) Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theor Popul Biol 21:171–193
Strassmann JE (1984) Female-biased sex ratios in social insects lacking morphological castes. Evolution 38:256–266
Taylor PD (1987) A first-order equivalence of genetic and inclusive fitness models. Theor Popul Biol (in press)
Taylor PD, Bulmer MG (1980) Local mate competition and the sex ratio. J Theor Biol 86:409–419
Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of social insects. Science 191:249–263
Uyenoyama MK, Bengtsson BO (1981) Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio. II. Haplodiploid and diploid models with sibling and parental control of the brood sex ratio and brood size. Theor Popul Biol 20:57–79
Uyenoyama MK, Bengtsson BO (1982) Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio. III. Parental and sibling control of brood investment ratio under partial sibmating. Theor Popul Biol 22:43–68
Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Yamaguchi Y (1985) Sex ratios of an aphid subject to local mate competition with variable maternal condition. Nature 318:460–462
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frank, S.A. Variable sex ratio among colonies of ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20, 195–201 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299733
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299733