Summary
Whirligig beetles aggregate in the daytime into dense single-and multispecies groups (‘rafts’) of hundreds or thousands of individuals. On the 22km shoreline of Lake Itasca in northern Minnesota, these aggregations were on the average 0.8 km apart, and they were usually found day after day in the same ocations.
Most beetles apparently do not ‘home’ to the aggregation of their origin after dispersing at night because (a) the species composition of some aggregations changed greatly, and (b) paint-marked beetles (Dineutus horni) moved overnight from one aggregation as far as 4km, joining 11 of the 14 large (>300 beetles) D. horni groups on the lake.
Throughout the night, the largest concentrations of beetles remained within 100m of the diurnal aggregation sites. Beetles reconvened into the compact rafts before daybreak, in part by following each other in sometimes long single files or ‘trains’. Their forward motion stopped after they joined large number of other beetles. We infer that following behavior enables those individuals that have dispersed from their original aggregations (during their nocturnal foraging) to find and join other aggregations before daylight.
Naive fish ate the beetles despite their noxious secretions. However, fish living near rafting sites and feeding on insects on the water surface in daylight should soon learn to avoid the beetles. The rafting sites would then become ‘safe’ places. We observed fish attacking only those beetles that had been either dispersed from their rafts or released into open water away from raft sites in the daytime. We speculate that the evolutionary significance of the aggregation behavior is related to predator (fish) avoidance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383
Benfield E (1972) A defensive secretion of Dineutes discolor (Coleoptera: Gyrinidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 65:1324–1327
Eggers F (1927) Nähere Mitteilungen über das Johnstonsche Sinnessorgan und über das Ausweichvermögen der Taumelkäfer. Zool Anz 71:136–156 (1927)
Eisner T, Meinwald J (1966) Defensive secretions of arthropods. Science 158:1341–1350
Forbes SA (1888) On the food relations of fresh-water fishes: a summary and discussion. Bull Ill Lab Nat Hist 2:475–538
Hagen KS (1962) Biology and ecology of predaceous coccinellidae. Annu Rev Entomol 7:289–326
Hamilton III WJ, Watt KEF (1970) Refuging. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:263–286
Heinrich B, Bartholomew GA (1979) Roles of endothermy and size in inter- and intra-specific competition for elephant dung in an African dung beetle. Scarabaeus laevistriatus. Physiol Zool 52:464–484
Leech HB, Chandler HP (1956) Aquatic coleoptera. In: Usinger RL (ed) Aquatic insects of California. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp 326–330
Loiselle PV, Barlow GW (1978) Do fishes lek like birds? In: Reese ES Lightner FJ (eds) Contrasts in behavior. Wiley, New York, pp 31–75
Meinwald J, Opheim K, Eisner T (1972) Gyrinidal: a sesquiterpenoid aldehyde from the defensive glands of gyrinid beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:1208–1210
Nachtigall W (1965) Locomotion: swimming (hydronamics) of aquatic insects. In: Rockstein M (ed) The physiology of Insecta, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, p 255
Newhart AT, Mumma RO (1978) High-pressure liquid chromatographic techniques for the separation and quantification of norsesquiterpenes from gyrinids. J Chem Ecol 4:503–510
Ohguchi O (1978) Experiments on the selection against colour oddity of water fleas by three-spined sticklebacks. Z Tierpsychol 47:254–267
Tucker VA (1969) Wave making by whirligig beetles (Gyrinidae). Science 166:897–899
Wagner HO (1954) Massenansammlungen von Weberknechten in Mexiko. Z Tierpsychol 11:349–352
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 120–135
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heinrich, B., Vogt, F.D. Aggregation and foraging behavior of whirligig beetles (Gyrinidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7, 179–186 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299362
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299362