Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual harassment on campus: Effects of professor gender on perception of sexually harassing behaviors

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undergraduate students viewed four videotaped vignettes that depicted potentially sexually harassing interactions between professors and students. Subjects were asked to evaluate the professor's behavior. The vignettes were composed so that two dimensions were manipulated: the sex of the initiator of the behavior and the type of behavior. Results of the study provided partial support of the following hypotheses: (1) the behaviors of female professors initiating potentially sexually harassing behaviors toward male students would be perceived as more appropriate than would the same behaviors initiated by male professors toward female students in identical situations; (2) female subjects would interpret the behaviors as more harassing than male subjects; and finally (3) subtle forms of harassment would be interpreted as more inappropriate by female students than by male students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson, D. J., & Thomson, G. E. (1982). Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relation, sexual interest, and gender stratification. Social Problems, 29, 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E. G. C., & Blodgett, T. B. (1981). Sexual harassment: Some see it ... others won't. Harvard Business Review, 59, 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziech, B. W., & Weiner, L. (1984). The lecherous professor. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1980). Discrimination because of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, adoption of interim interpretive guidelines. Federal Register, 45, 25024–25025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Weitzman, L. M., Gold, Y., & Ormerod, M. (1988). Academic harassment: sex and denial in scholarly garb. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Morasch, B., & Cohen, A. G. (1983). Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Nakamura, C. Y., Gahart, M., Handschumacher, I., & Russell, D. (1980). Sexuality and the workplace. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, T., & Gutek, B. A. (1982) Attributions and assignments of responsibility in sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. (1986). Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles, 15, 535–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B., Reilly, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1982). Sexual assault and harassment: a campus community case study. Signs, 8, 296–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, K., Olson, C. V., & Satterfield, A. (1988). Graduate students' experiences with and responses to sexual harassment: a research note. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the Federal workplace. Washington, DC: Office of Merit Systems Review and Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. (1986). Effects of sex role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 14, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, T., Carpenter, S., Dull, V., & Bartlett, K. (1982). The factorial survey: an approach to defining sexual harassment on campus. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, T., Lott, B., & Gallogy, S. M. (1986). Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles, 15, 333–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remland, M. S., & Jones, T. S. (1985). Sex differences, communication consistency, and judgments of sexual harassment in a performance appraisal interview. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 156–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., & Weber-Burdin, E. (1983). Sexual harassment on the campus. Social Science Research, 12, 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1986). A hierarchy of sexual harassment. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 599–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomann, D. A., & Weiner, R. L. (1987). Physical and psychological causality as determinants of culpability in sexual harassment cases. Sex Roles, 17, 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marks, M.A., Nelson, E.S. Sexual harassment on campus: Effects of professor gender on perception of sexually harassing behaviors. Sex Roles 28, 207–217 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299281

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299281

Keywords

Navigation