On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera

Summary

A number of hypotheses for the occurrence of multiple mating by queens of social Hymenoptera are reviewed in the light of Cole's (1983) observation that polyandrous species tend to have larger colonies than single-mating ones. Most of these hypotheses cannot be definitively excluded, but only three of them appear sufficiently general, plausible and predictive to be useful guides to further research. These, and their predictions, are: (1) Caste-determination has a genetic basis and hence polyandry allows fuller expression of the potential caste system in each colony. Species with more complex caste differentiation should be more often polyandrous than species with simpler caste systems. (2) Polyandry maximises the production of divergent worker genotypes and hence the range of environmental conditions that a colony can tolerate. Broader-niched species should be more often polyandrous than species with narrower niches. (3) The reduction of the variance of diploid male production, under the heterozygosity sex-determination model, favors polyandry when sexuals are produced late during colony growth. Queens in species reproducing during the exponential phase of colony growth should tend to mate once, but queens should tend to be polyandrous in species with reproduction occurring further along the colony growth curve. Williams's (1975) observation that the level of genetic variation in a brood approaches a maximum very quickly with increasing polyandry is quantified for females; the initial increase is much greater for male-haploid than for male-diploid species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams J, Rothman ED, Kerr WE, Paulino ZL (1977) Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetcs 86:583–596

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alcock J, Barrows EM, Gordh G, Hubbard LJ, Kierkendall L, Pyle DW, Ponder TL, Zalom FG (1978) The ecology and evolution of male reproductive behaviour in the bees and wasps. Zool J Linn Soc 64:293–326

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alcock J, Eickwort GC, Eickwort KR (1977) The reproductive behavior of Anthidium maculosum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the evolutionary significance of multiple copulations by females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:385–396

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brues AM (1954) Selection and polymorphism in the A-B-O blood groups. Amer J Phys Anthropol 12:559–597

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buschinger A (1978) Genetisch bedingte Entstchung geflügelter Weibchen bie der sklavenhaltenden Ameise Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.) (Hym., Form.). Insectes Soc 25:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carpenter FM, Hermann HR (1979) Antiquity of sociality in insects. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects. Volume I. Academic Press, New York, pp 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cole BJ (1983) Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  8. Craig R (1980) Sex investment ratios in social Hymenoptera. Am Nat 116:311–323

    Google Scholar 

  9. Craig R, Crozier RH (1978) No evidence for role of heterozygosity in ant caste determination. Isozyme Bull 11:66–67

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Crozier RH (1970) Coefficients of relationship and the identity of genes by descent in the Hymenoptera. Am Nat 104:216–217

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crozier RH (1971) Heterozyosity and sex-determination in haplo-diploidy. Am Nat 105:399–412

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crozier RH (1975) Animal cytogenetics 3 Insecta (7) Hymenoptera. Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin and Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crozier RH (1977) Evolutionary genetics of the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 22:263–288

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crozier RH (1979) Genetics of sociality. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–286

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crozier RH (1980) Genetical structure of social insect populations. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: Hypotheses and empirical tests. Verlag Chemie GmbH, Weinheim, pp 129–146

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crozier RH (1982) On insects and insects: twists and turns in our understanding of the evolution of sociality. In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 4–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crozier RH, Brueckner D (1981) Sperm clumping and the population genetics of Hymenoptera. Am Nat 117:561–563

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crozier RH, Consul PC (1976) Conditions for genetic polymorphism in social Hymenoptera under selection at the colony level. Theor Population Biol 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  20. Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1980) Asymmetry in relatcdness: Who is related to whom? Nature 283:604

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davidson DW (1982) Sexual sclection in harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:245–250

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garofalo CA (1980) Reproductive aspects and evolution of social behavior in bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Rev Bras Genet 3:139–152

    Google Scholar 

  23. Getz WM, Brueckner D, Parisian T (1982) Kin structure and swarming behavior of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:265–270

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gillespie JH (1977) Natural selection for variances in offspring numbers: A new evolutionary principle. Am Nat 111:1010–1014

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gobbi N (1975) Aspectos evolutivos da bionomia das vespas, visualizados atraves de estudos de reproducao (Hymenoptera, Aculeata). Unpublished M. Sc. thesis, University of Sao Paulo at Ribeira Preto

  26. Gould SJ (1980) The evolutionary biology of constraint. Daedalus 109(2):39–52

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gwynne DT (1984) Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bushcrickets. Nature 307:361–363

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical theory of the evolution of social behaviour, 1. J Theor Biol 7:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical theory of the evolution of social behaviour, 2. J Theor Biol 7:17–52

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hedrick PW, Ginevan ME, Ewing EP (1976) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kerr WE (1961) Acasalemento de rainhas com varias machos em duas especies da tribu Attini (Hymenoptera: Formicioidea). Rev Bras Biol 21:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kerr WE (1975) Evolution of the population structure in bees. Genetics 79:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kerr WE, Zucchi R, Nakadaira JK, Butolo JE (1962) Reproduction in the social bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J New York Entomol Soc 70:265–276

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lacy RC, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition by phenotype natching. Am Nat 121:489–512

    Google Scholar 

  35. Laidlaw HH, Gomes FP, Kerr WE (1956) Estimation of the number of lethal alleles in a panmictic population of Apismellifera L. Genetics 41:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  36. Laidlaw HH, Page RE (1984) Polyandry in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): sperm utilization and intra-colony relationships. Genetics 108:985–997

    Google Scholar 

  37. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maynard Smith J (1976) What determines the rate of evolution? Am Nat 110:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  40. Metcalf RA (1980) Sex ratios, parent-offspring confliet, and local competition for mates in the social wasps Polistes melricus and Polistes variatus. Am Nat 116:642–654

    Google Scholar 

  41. Metcalf RA, Whitt GS (1977) Intra-nest relatedness in the social wasp Polistes metricus: a genetic analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:339–351

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moritz RFA (1982) Evolution of sociality in Apis mellifera. A queen or worker strategy? In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, p 252

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moritz RFA (1985) The effects of multiple mating on the worker-gyne conflict in Apis mellifera L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (in press)

  44. Moser JC (1967) Mating activities of Atta texana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc 14:295–312

    Google Scholar 

  45. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, pp 24–74, pp 140–144, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  46. Page RE (1980) The evolution of multiple mating behavior by honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.). Genetics 96:263–273

    Google Scholar 

  47. Page RE, Marks RW (1982) The population genetics of sex determination in honey bees: random mating in closed populations. Heredity 48:263–270

    Google Scholar 

  48. Page RE, Metcalf RA (1982) Multiple mating, sperm utilization, and social evolution. Am Nat 119:263–281

    Google Scholar 

  49. Page RE, Kimsey RB, Laidlaw HH (1984) Migration and dispersal of spermatozoa in spemathecae of queen honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Experientia 40:182–184

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pamilo P (1982a) Multiple mating in Formica ants. Hereditas 97:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pamilo P (1982b) Genetic evolution of sex ratios in cusocial Hymenoptera: allele frequency simulations. Am Nat 119:638–656

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1982) Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theor Population Biol 21:171–193

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pamilo P, Rosengren R, Vepsalainen K, Varvio-Aho S-L, Pisarski B (1978) Population genetics of Formica ants. I. Patterns of enzyme gene variation. Hereditas 89:233–248

    Google Scholar 

  54. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–568

    Google Scholar 

  55. Roughgarden J (1979) Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: an introduction. Macmillan, New York, p 163, p 304

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ruttner F, Woyke J, Kerr WE (1973) Reproduction in Apis cerana. 2. Reproductive organs and natural insemination. J Apic Res 12:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  57. Selander RK, Kaufmann DW (1973) Genic variation and strategies of adaptation in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:1875–1877

    Google Scholar 

  58. Snell GD (1935) The determination of sex in Habrobracon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 21:446–453

    Google Scholar 

  59. Starr CK (1985) Sperm competition, kinship and sociality in the aculeate Hymenoptera. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Acadenic Press, New York, pp 427–464

    Google Scholar 

  60. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard, Cambridge, pp 463–465

    Google Scholar 

  61. Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  62. Turner ME, Anderson WW (1983) Multiple mating and female fitness in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 37:714–723

    Google Scholar 

  63. Uyenovama MK, Bengtsson BO (1981) Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio. II. Haplodiploid and diploid models with sibling and parental control of the brood sex ratio and brood size. Theor Population Biol 20:57–79

    Google Scholar 

  64. Uyenoyama MK, Feldman MW (1980) Theories of kin and group selection: A population genetics perspective. Theor Population Biol 17:380–414

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wade MJ (1982) The effect of multiple inseminations on the evolution of social behaviors in diploid and haplo-diploid organisms. J Theor Biol 95:351–368

    Google Scholar 

  66. Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:780–799

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ward PS (1980) Genetic variation and population differentiation in the Rhytidoponera impressa group, a species complex of porerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Evolution 34:1060–1076

    Google Scholar 

  68. West MJ (1969) The social biology of polistine wasps. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Michigan 140:1–101

    Google Scholar 

  69. West Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  70. Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, p 129

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wilson EO (1963) Social modifications related to rareness in ant species. Evolution 17:249–253

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 181–182, p 433

    Google Scholar 

  73. Yokoyama S, Nei M (1979) Population dynamics of sex-determining allcles in honey bees and self-incompatability alleles in plants. Genetics 91:609–626

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crozier, R.H., Page, R.E. On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18, 105–115 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299039

Download citation

Keywords

  • Genetic Variation
  • Growth Curve
  • Genetic Basis
  • Exponential Phase
  • Initial Increase