Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 105–115 | Cite as

On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera

  • R. H. Crozier
  • R. E. Page


A number of hypotheses for the occurrence of multiple mating by queens of social Hymenoptera are reviewed in the light of Cole's (1983) observation that polyandrous species tend to have larger colonies than single-mating ones. Most of these hypotheses cannot be definitively excluded, but only three of them appear sufficiently general, plausible and predictive to be useful guides to further research. These, and their predictions, are: (1) Caste-determination has a genetic basis and hence polyandry allows fuller expression of the potential caste system in each colony. Species with more complex caste differentiation should be more often polyandrous than species with simpler caste systems. (2) Polyandry maximises the production of divergent worker genotypes and hence the range of environmental conditions that a colony can tolerate. Broader-niched species should be more often polyandrous than species with narrower niches. (3) The reduction of the variance of diploid male production, under the heterozygosity sex-determination model, favors polyandry when sexuals are produced late during colony growth. Queens in species reproducing during the exponential phase of colony growth should tend to mate once, but queens should tend to be polyandrous in species with reproduction occurring further along the colony growth curve. Williams's (1975) observation that the level of genetic variation in a brood approaches a maximum very quickly with increasing polyandry is quantified for females; the initial increase is much greater for male-haploid than for male-diploid species.


Genetic Variation Growth Curve Genetic Basis Exponential Phase Initial Increase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams J, Rothman ED, Kerr WE, Paulino ZL (1977) Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetcs 86:583–596Google Scholar
  2. Alcock J, Barrows EM, Gordh G, Hubbard LJ, Kierkendall L, Pyle DW, Ponder TL, Zalom FG (1978) The ecology and evolution of male reproductive behaviour in the bees and wasps. Zool J Linn Soc 64:293–326Google Scholar
  3. Alcock J, Eickwort GC, Eickwort KR (1977) The reproductive behavior of Anthidium maculosum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the evolutionary significance of multiple copulations by females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:385–396Google Scholar
  4. Brues AM (1954) Selection and polymorphism in the A-B-O blood groups. Amer J Phys Anthropol 12:559–597Google Scholar
  5. Buschinger A (1978) Genetisch bedingte Entstchung geflügelter Weibchen bie der sklavenhaltenden Ameise Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.) (Hym., Form.). Insectes Soc 25:163–172Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter FM, Hermann HR (1979) Antiquity of sociality in insects. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects. Volume I. Academic Press, New York, pp 81–89Google Scholar
  7. Cole BJ (1983) Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:191–201Google Scholar
  8. Craig R (1980) Sex investment ratios in social Hymenoptera. Am Nat 116:311–323Google Scholar
  9. Craig R, Crozier RH (1978) No evidence for role of heterozygosity in ant caste determination. Isozyme Bull 11:66–67Google Scholar
  10. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York, p 24Google Scholar
  11. Crozier RH (1970) Coefficients of relationship and the identity of genes by descent in the Hymenoptera. Am Nat 104:216–217Google Scholar
  12. Crozier RH (1971) Heterozyosity and sex-determination in haplo-diploidy. Am Nat 105:399–412Google Scholar
  13. Crozier RH (1975) Animal cytogenetics 3 Insecta (7) Hymenoptera. Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin and StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  14. Crozier RH (1977) Evolutionary genetics of the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 22:263–288Google Scholar
  15. Crozier RH (1979) Genetics of sociality. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–286Google Scholar
  16. Crozier RH (1980) Genetical structure of social insect populations. In: Markl H (ed) Evolution of social behavior: Hypotheses and empirical tests. Verlag Chemie GmbH, Weinheim, pp 129–146Google Scholar
  17. Crozier RH (1982) On insects and insects: twists and turns in our understanding of the evolution of sociality. In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 4–10Google Scholar
  18. Crozier RH, Brueckner D (1981) Sperm clumping and the population genetics of Hymenoptera. Am Nat 117:561–563Google Scholar
  19. Crozier RH, Consul PC (1976) Conditions for genetic polymorphism in social Hymenoptera under selection at the colony level. Theor Population Biol 10:1–9Google Scholar
  20. Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1980) Asymmetry in relatcdness: Who is related to whom? Nature 283:604Google Scholar
  21. Davidson DW (1982) Sexual sclection in harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:245–250Google Scholar
  22. Garofalo CA (1980) Reproductive aspects and evolution of social behavior in bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Rev Bras Genet 3:139–152Google Scholar
  23. Getz WM, Brueckner D, Parisian T (1982) Kin structure and swarming behavior of the honey bee Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:265–270Google Scholar
  24. Gillespie JH (1977) Natural selection for variances in offspring numbers: A new evolutionary principle. Am Nat 111:1010–1014Google Scholar
  25. Gobbi N (1975) Aspectos evolutivos da bionomia das vespas, visualizados atraves de estudos de reproducao (Hymenoptera, Aculeata). Unpublished M. Sc. thesis, University of Sao Paulo at Ribeira PretoGoogle Scholar
  26. Gould SJ (1980) The evolutionary biology of constraint. Daedalus 109(2):39–52Google Scholar
  27. Gwynne DT (1984) Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bushcrickets. Nature 307:361–363Google Scholar
  28. Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical theory of the evolution of social behaviour, 1. J Theor Biol 7:1–16Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical theory of the evolution of social behaviour, 2. J Theor Biol 7:17–52Google Scholar
  30. Hedrick PW, Ginevan ME, Ewing EP (1976) Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:1–32Google Scholar
  31. Kerr WE (1961) Acasalemento de rainhas com varias machos em duas especies da tribu Attini (Hymenoptera: Formicioidea). Rev Bras Biol 21:45–48Google Scholar
  32. Kerr WE (1975) Evolution of the population structure in bees. Genetics 79:73–84Google Scholar
  33. Kerr WE, Zucchi R, Nakadaira JK, Butolo JE (1962) Reproduction in the social bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J New York Entomol Soc 70:265–276Google Scholar
  34. Lacy RC, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition by phenotype natching. Am Nat 121:489–512Google Scholar
  35. Laidlaw HH, Gomes FP, Kerr WE (1956) Estimation of the number of lethal alleles in a panmictic population of Apismellifera L. Genetics 41:179–188Google Scholar
  36. Laidlaw HH, Page RE (1984) Polyandry in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): sperm utilization and intra-colony relationships. Genetics 108:985–997Google Scholar
  37. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ. Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  38. Maynard Smith J (1976) What determines the rate of evolution? Am Nat 110:331–338Google Scholar
  39. Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Metcalf RA (1980) Sex ratios, parent-offspring confliet, and local competition for mates in the social wasps Polistes melricus and Polistes variatus. Am Nat 116:642–654Google Scholar
  41. Metcalf RA, Whitt GS (1977) Intra-nest relatedness in the social wasp Polistes metricus: a genetic analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:339–351Google Scholar
  42. Moritz RFA (1982) Evolution of sociality in Apis mellifera. A queen or worker strategy? In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, p 252Google Scholar
  43. Moritz RFA (1985) The effects of multiple mating on the worker-gyne conflict in Apis mellifera L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (in press)Google Scholar
  44. Moser JC (1967) Mating activities of Atta texana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc 14:295–312Google Scholar
  45. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, pp 24–74, pp 140–144, p 58Google Scholar
  46. Page RE (1980) The evolution of multiple mating behavior by honey bee queens (Apis mellifera L.). Genetics 96:263–273Google Scholar
  47. Page RE, Marks RW (1982) The population genetics of sex determination in honey bees: random mating in closed populations. Heredity 48:263–270Google Scholar
  48. Page RE, Metcalf RA (1982) Multiple mating, sperm utilization, and social evolution. Am Nat 119:263–281Google Scholar
  49. Page RE, Kimsey RB, Laidlaw HH (1984) Migration and dispersal of spermatozoa in spemathecae of queen honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Experientia 40:182–184Google Scholar
  50. Pamilo P (1982a) Multiple mating in Formica ants. Hereditas 97:37–45Google Scholar
  51. Pamilo P (1982b) Genetic evolution of sex ratios in cusocial Hymenoptera: allele frequency simulations. Am Nat 119:638–656Google Scholar
  52. Pamilo P, Crozier RH (1982) Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: methodology. Theor Population Biol 21:171–193Google Scholar
  53. Pamilo P, Rosengren R, Vepsalainen K, Varvio-Aho S-L, Pisarski B (1978) Population genetics of Formica ants. I. Patterns of enzyme gene variation. Hereditas 89:233–248Google Scholar
  54. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–568Google Scholar
  55. Roughgarden J (1979) Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: an introduction. Macmillan, New York, p 163, p 304Google Scholar
  56. Ruttner F, Woyke J, Kerr WE (1973) Reproduction in Apis cerana. 2. Reproductive organs and natural insemination. J Apic Res 12:21–34Google Scholar
  57. Selander RK, Kaufmann DW (1973) Genic variation and strategies of adaptation in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:1875–1877Google Scholar
  58. Snell GD (1935) The determination of sex in Habrobracon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 21:446–453Google Scholar
  59. Starr CK (1985) Sperm competition, kinship and sociality in the aculeate Hymenoptera. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Acadenic Press, New York, pp 427–464Google Scholar
  60. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard, Cambridge, pp 463–465Google Scholar
  61. Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263Google Scholar
  62. Turner ME, Anderson WW (1983) Multiple mating and female fitness in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 37:714–723Google Scholar
  63. Uyenovama MK, Bengtsson BO (1981) Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio. II. Haplodiploid and diploid models with sibling and parental control of the brood sex ratio and brood size. Theor Population Biol 20:57–79Google Scholar
  64. Uyenoyama MK, Feldman MW (1980) Theories of kin and group selection: A population genetics perspective. Theor Population Biol 17:380–414Google Scholar
  65. Wade MJ (1982) The effect of multiple inseminations on the evolution of social behaviors in diploid and haplo-diploid organisms. J Theor Biol 95:351–368Google Scholar
  66. Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:780–799Google Scholar
  67. Ward PS (1980) Genetic variation and population differentiation in the Rhytidoponera impressa group, a species complex of porerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Evolution 34:1060–1076Google Scholar
  68. West MJ (1969) The social biology of polistine wasps. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Michigan 140:1–101Google Scholar
  69. West Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1–33Google Scholar
  70. Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, p 129Google Scholar
  71. Wilson EO (1963) Social modifications related to rareness in ant species. Evolution 17:249–253Google Scholar
  72. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 181–182, p 433Google Scholar
  73. Yokoyama S, Nei M (1979) Population dynamics of sex-determining allcles in honey bees and self-incompatability alleles in plants. Genetics 91:609–626Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Crozier
    • 1
  • R. E. Page
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ZoologyUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations