Skip to main content
Log in

Pregnancy blockage following multiple-male copulation or exposure at the time of mating in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Pregnancy blockage resulting from multiple-male copulation or exposure around the time of mating was studied in three experiments on deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus. First, significantly more females were pregnant after copulating, either with or without disturbance and a delay, with one male than after receiving the same total number of ejaculations from two males. Second, when females received three ejaculations from one male and then were immediately exposed to either a blonde male or a wild-type male for 2 h, the pregnancy rate was lower than when they were exposed to an empty cage. Third, when immediately after mating females were placed for 2 h in the cage of a strange male they were less likely to deliver a litter than when placed in the familiar male's cage. This phenomenon bears at least a superficial resemblence to the Bruce effect but either communality or difference in underlying mechanism remains to be determined. The present multi-male pregnancy block may provide a means for females in unstable social situations to defer reproduction for 4 days or longer when more stable conditions may exist and a single male prevails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison AJ (1977) Flock mating in sheep II. Effect of number of ewes per ram on mating behavior and fertility of two-tooth and mixed-age Romney ewes run together. NZ J Agric Res 20:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaty RA (1960) Fertility of mixed semen from different rabbits. J Reprod Fertil 1:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty RA (1970) The genetics of the mammalian gamete. Biol Rev 45:73–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram BCR (1976) Kin selection in lions and in evolution. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall DA, Nash D (1973) Occurrence of successful multiple insemination of females in natural populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Evolution 27:106–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch S (1974) Observations on the ability of the stud male to block pregnancy in the mouse. J Reprod Fertil 38:469–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorman E, Parker GA (1976) Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age and mating status. Ecol Entomol 1:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronson FH, Coquelin A (1980) The modulation of reproduction by priming pheromones in house mice: Speculations on adaptive function. In: Müller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals: Vertebrates and aquatic invertebrates. Plenum Press, New York, pp 243–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronson FH, Eleftheriou BE (1963) Influence of strange males on implanation in the deermouse. Gen Comp Endocrinol 3:515–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce HM (1959) An exteroceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature 184:105

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce HM (1961) Time relations in the pregnancy-block induced in mice by strange males. J Reprod Fertil 2:138–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers JR (1978) Biosystematics of the genus Euxoa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) X. Incidence and level of multiple mating in natural and laboratory populations. Can Entomol 110:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun JB (1962) The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. US Dept Health Educ Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman RK, Holt JA, Fox KA (1966) Pregnancy failure in laboratory mice after multiple short-term exposure to strange males. Nature 210:653

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1971) The comparative physiology of gamete populations. Adv Comp Physiol Biochem 4:256–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox CR, LeBoeuf BJ (1977) Female incitation of male competition: A mechanism in sexual selection. Am Nat 111:317–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1979a) Copulatory behavior of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) I. Normative data, subspecific differences, and effects of cross-fostering. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1979b) Copulatory behavior of deer mice (Peromycus maniculatus) III. Effects on pregnancy initiation. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:178–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1981a) On the function of the multiple-intromission, multiple-ejaculation copulatory patterns of rodents. Bull Psychon Soc 18:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1981b) Social dominance, copulatory behavior, and differential reproduction in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). J Comp Physiol Psychol 95:880–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA, Baumgardner DJ (1981) Studies of sperm competition in two species of muroid rodents. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson AR, Falls JB (1975) Evidence for multiple insemination in the common garter snake, Thamnophis sirtalis. Can J Zool 53:1362–1368

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray GD, Zerylnick, M, Davis HN, Dewsbury DA (1974) Effects of variations in male copulatory behavior on ovulation and implantation in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Horn Behav 5:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanken J, Sherman PW (1981) Multiple paternity in Belding's ground squirrel litters. Science 212:351–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WJ (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess EA, Ludwick T, Rickard HC, Fordyce E (1954) Some of the influences of mixed ejaculates upon bovine fertility. J Dairy Sci 37:649–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Keverne EB, Riva C de la (1982) Pheromones in mice: reciprocal interaction between the nose and brain. Nature 296:148–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushner F (1954) The effect of heterospermic insemination in animals and its biological nature. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Biol 1:1–32 (Translated by A McLaren)

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov JB (1981) Pregnancy blocking in rodents: Adaptive advantages for females. Am Nat 118:361–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott DF, Hopwood JH (1972) Olfactory pregnancy-block in mice (Mus musculus): An unusual response acquisition paradigm. Anim Behav 20:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallory FF, Brooks RJ (1980) Infanticide and pregnancy failure: Reproductive strategies in the female collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus). Biol Reprod 22:192–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan SR (1979) Pregnancy blockage and the memory of the stud male in the vole (Microtus agrestis). J Reprod Fertil 57:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan SR (1980) Pheromones and rodent reproductive physiology. Symp Zool Soc (Lond) 45:251–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier RAN (1961) Fertility in the male rabbit III. Estimation of spermatozoan quality by mixed insemination, and the inheritance of spermatozoan characters. J Reprod Fertil 2:273–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby JM, Lanier DL, Dewsbury DA (1981) The role of prolonged copulatory behavior in facilitating reproductive success in male Syran golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) in a competitive mating situation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RJ (1979) “Blonde” mutants. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University

  • Rogers JG, Beauchamp GK (1976) Some ecological implications of primer chemical stimuli in rodents. In: Doty RL (ed) Mammaliam olfaction, reproductive processes and behavior. Academic Press, New York, pp 181–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Cade WH (1980) Female mating frequency and progeny production in singly and doubly mated house and field crickets. Can J Zool 58:404–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL (1979) The Bruce effect: An evaluation of male/female advantages. Am Nat 114:932–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehn RA, Jannett FJ Jr (1981) Male-induced abortion in various microtine rodents. J Mammal 62:369–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehn RA, Richmond ME (1975) Male-induced pregnancy termination in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Science 187:1211–1213

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart DM (1980) The ecology of vertebrate olfaction. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin CEG (1979) Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:780–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1962) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dewsbury, D.A. Pregnancy blockage following multiple-male copulation or exposure at the time of mating in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11, 37–42 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297664

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297664

Keywords

Navigation