Long-range communication of species identity by song in the Red-winged Blackbird
- 138 Downloads
At a height of 1.5 m above the ground in the habitat studied, sound transmission is greates below about 4.5 kHz. Attenuation of sound energy increases monotonically above this frequency (Fig. 3). Peak redwing song energy occurs from about 2.5–4.0 kHz (Fig. 1).
With increasing distance from a speaker most or all of the spectral structure in the introductory song components, as well as higher frequencies in the concluding trill, is severely attenuated. Songs of different males converge with distance upon a narrow frequency band (2.5–4.0 kHz) contained within the trill (Fig. 4).
This frequency band coincides with a relatively quiet region of the acoustic environment, bordered on the low frequency side by wind disturbance and, in the later part of the breeding season, on the higher frequency end by calls of various orthopteran species (Fig. 6). There may be, then, a ‘noise window’ for optimal long-distance song transmission in this spectral region.
The 2.5–4.0 kHz section of the trill is both necessary and sufficient to evoke a strong species-specific behavioral response, and contains sufficient information to do so even after transmission over a distance of at least 100 m. Neither the introductory components by themselves nor the high frequency part of the trill (4–6 kHz) are effective in producing such a response.
It is concluded from these results that the trill portion of the redwing song encodes species identity and is adapted to communicate this information to receivers at relatively long distances. Three potential functions for such an adaptation are discussed.
KeywordsSpecies Identity Sound Transmission High Frequency Part Quiet Region Narrow Frequency Band
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alexander RD (1967) Acoustical communication in arthropods. Ann Rev Entomol 12:495–526Google Scholar
- Aylor D (1971) Noise reduction by vegetation and ground. J Acoust Soc Am 51:197–205Google Scholar
- Beletsky LD, Chao S, Smith DC (1980) An investigation of song-based species recognition in the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behaviour 73:189–203Google Scholar
- Bowman RI (1979) Adaptive morphology of song dialects in Darwin's finches. J Ornithol 120:353–389Google Scholar
- Brenowitz EA (1978) Long-range communication of species identity in the song of the Red-winged Blackbird. Program abstract, Northeast Regional Meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, Monmouth College, West Long Branch, New Jersey, October, 1978Google Scholar
- Brenowitz EA (1981a) ‘Territorial song’ as a flocking signal in Red-winged Blackbirds. Anim Behav 29:641–642Google Scholar
- Brenowitz EA (1981b) The effect of stimulus presentation sequence on the response of Red-winged Blackbirds in playback studies. Auk 98:355–360Google Scholar
- Emlen ST (1972) An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour 41:130–171Google Scholar
- Gerhardt HC (1976) Significance of two frequency bands in long distance vocal communication in the Green Treefrog. Nature 261:692–694Google Scholar
- Heinz RD, Sinnott JM, Sachs MB (1977) Auditory sensitivity of the Redwing Blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) and Brownheaded Cowbird (Molothrus ater). J Comp Physiol Psychol 91:1365–1376Google Scholar
- Howard RA Jr (1977) Habitat structure, polygyny, and the evolution of upland nesting in Red-winged Blackbirds. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
- Linsens HF, Martens MMJ, Hendriksen HJGM, Roestenberg-Sinnige AM, Brouwers WAJM, Stoak ALHC van der, Strik-Jensen AMJ (1976) The acoustic climate of plant communities. Oecologia (Berl) 23:165–177Google Scholar
- Marler P (1957) Specific distinctiveness in the communication signals of birds. Behaviour 11:13–39Google Scholar
- Marler P (1960) Bird songs and mate selection. In: Lanyon WE, Tavolga WN (eds) Animal sounds and communication. AIBS, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Marten K, Marler P, (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. I. Temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:271–290Google Scholar
- Marten K, Quine D, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:291–302Google Scholar
- Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 108:17–34Google Scholar
- Orians GH, Christman GM (1968) A comparative study of the behavior of Red-winged, Tricolored, and Yellow-headed Black-brids. Univ Calif Publ Zool 84:1–82Google Scholar
- Peek FW (1972) An experimental study of the territorial function of vocal and visual display in the male Red-winged Blackbrid (Agelaius phoeniceus). Anim Behav 20:112–118Google Scholar
- Richards DG (1981a) Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by the Carolina Wren. Auk 98:127–133Google Scholar
- Richards DG (1981b) Alterting and message components in songs of Rufous-sided Towhees. Behaviour 76:223–249Google Scholar
- Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381–399Google Scholar
- Robbins CS, Bruun B, Zim HS, Singer A (1966) Birds of North America. Golden Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Waser PM, Waser MS (1977) Experimental studies of primate vocalization: specializations for long distance propagation. Z Tierpsychol 43:239–263Google Scholar
- West MJ, King AP, Eastzer DH (1981) The Cowbird: reflections on development from an unlikely source. Am Sci 69:57–66Google Scholar
- Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69–94Google Scholar
- Yasukawa K (1981a) Song repertoires in the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus): a test of the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim Behav 29:114–125Google Scholar
- Yasukawa K (1981b) Song and territory defense in the Red-winged Blackbird. Auk 98:185–187Google Scholar