Skip to main content
Log in

Hummingbird isolegs in an experimental system

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Optimal foraging theory was first looked upon as a tool to study the evolution of niches in community ecology. Isoleg theory is being developed to reestablish it as such a tool. Isoleg theories are maps of isolegs in a graph whose axes are population densities. There are two kinds of isolegs: some are lines of equal optimal behavior in the graph; others mark threshold combinations of densities past which sudden shifts in behavior should occur. A technique for determining whether isolegs exist is described and applied to hummingbird data. These data were collected experimentally in the field expressly to test one isoleg model. All three species of hummingbird exhibited at least one of the sudden-shift type of isoleg. Their behaviors map onto the density graph in the predicted portions of the graph with only one exception. The data also support the prediction that behavior in the field is disjunct, i.e. subject to substantial, abrupt, discontinuous changes produced by very small continuous changes in a control variable. Some evidence for continuous control was also found, but it is ambiguous. Theory predicts that the two forms of control should be found together in some optimal systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brew JS (1982) Niche shifts and the minimisation of competition. Theor Popul Biol 22:367–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Joel S, Rosenzweig ML (1986) Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments. J Theor Biol (in press)

  • Caraco T (1980) On foraging time allocation in a stochastic environment. Ecology 61:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Covich AP (1976) Analyzing shapes of foraging areas: Some ecological and economic theories. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:235–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt LL (1967) Some developments in distance ‘sampling’. Biometrics 23:207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Higashi M, Yamamura N (1981) Prey distributions as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Am Nat 117:710–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG, Moran PAP (1963) Goemetrical probability. Chas Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, McCleery RH (1984) Optimization in behavioral ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds). Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach (2nd ed.). Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland MA, pp 91–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Stephens DW, Sutherland WJ (1983) Perspectives in optimal foraging. In: Brush AH, Clark GA (eds). Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 165–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor L, Maynard Smith J (1976) The coevolution and stability of competing species. Am Nat 110:79–99

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair JN (1979) A generalized model of optimal diets. Theor Popul Biol 15:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair JN (1981) A stochastic foraging model with predator training effects. II. Optimal diets. Theor Popul Biol 19:147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WA (1986) Information constraints and optimal foraging: A theory and some experiments with hummingbirds. Ph.D. disseration, University of Arizona

  • Oaten A (1977) Optimal foraging in patches: A case for stochasticity. Theor Popul Biol 12:263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Rosenzweig ML (1981) Competitors and habitat use. Oikos 37:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Rosenzweig ML, Mitchell WA (1985) Competition and food selection: Field tests of a theory. Ecology 66:798–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1975) Diet optimization with nutrient constraints. Am Nat 109:765–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1979) Economics of territory size and time budget in the goldenwinged sunbird. Am Nat 114:131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: A critical review. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport DJ (1971) An optimization model of food selection. Am Nat 105:575–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1974) On the optimal aboveground activity of bannertail kangaroo rats. J Mamm 55:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1979) Optimal habitat selection in two species competitive systems. Fortschr Zool 25:283–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1985) Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In: Cody ML (ed). Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, NY, pp 517–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML, Abramsky Z (1986) Centrifugal community organization. Oikos 46:339–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1979) Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60:256–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenzweig, M.L. Hummingbird isolegs in an experimental system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19, 313–322 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295704

Keywords

Navigation