Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 373–378 | Cite as

Badge size in the house sparrow Passer domesticus

Effects of intra- and intersexual selection
  • Anders Pape M//oller
Article
  • 353 Downloads

Summary

I studied female mate choice in house sparrows Passer domesticus in relation to the size of the black throat patch of males (badge size), which is a signal of dominance status, and to territory quality. Males with large badges obtained a mate earlier in spring than males with small badges. Males which remained unmated during the entire breeding season had smaller badges than mated males, even when controlling for the effect of other morphological traits and age. Largebadged males had territories with more breeding sites than small-badged males. Territories defended by males with large badges primarily had hole nest sites, which were safe from predators, and nestlings rarely fell from hole nests. Females were implanted with estradiol to induce copulation solicitation displays. Females responded more strongly to a male taxidermic mount and song than to song alone, and they responded more strongly and frequently to male mounts with large badges. Female house sparrows chose mates on the basis of male badges and perhaps on the basis of the quality of the nesting territories offered.

Keywords

House Sparrow Female Mate Choice Territory Quality Passer Domesticus Badge Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Glynn C (1986) Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature 323:152–153Google Scholar
  2. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 38:709–734Google Scholar
  3. Baker MC, Spitler-Nabors KJ, Bradley DC (1981) Early experience determines song dialect repponsiveness of female sparrows. Science 214:819–821Google Scholar
  4. Baker MC, Bjerke TK, Lampe H, Espmark Y (1986) Sexual response of female great tits to variation in size of males' song repertoires. Am Nat 128:491–498Google Scholar
  5. Baker MC, Bjerke TK, Lampe HU, Espmark YO (1987) Sexual response of female yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoires. Anim Behav 35:395–401Google Scholar
  6. Burrows WH, Titus HW (1939) Some observations on the semen production of the male fowl. Poultry Sci 18:8–10Google Scholar
  7. Catchpole CK, Dittami J. Leisler B (1984) Differential responses to male song repertoires in female songbirds implanted with oestradiol. Nature 312:563–564Google Scholar
  8. Cink C (1977) Winter behavior of the house sparrow. PhD thesis, University of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  9. Flood NJ (1984) Adaptive significance of delayed plumage maturation in male northern oriole. Evolution 38:267–279Google Scholar
  10. Fugle GN, Rothstein SI, Osenberg CW, McGinley MA (1984) Signals of status in wintering white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys gambelii). Anim Behav 32:86–93Google Scholar
  11. Hansen AJ, Rohwer S (1986) Coverable badges and resource defence in birds. Anim Behav 34:69–76Google Scholar
  12. Hansen P (1974) A comparative study of vocal behaviour of house sparrow Passer domesticus and tree sparrow Passer montanus. MSc thesis, University of Aarhus, Aarhus [Danish, English summary]Google Scholar
  13. Innis GS, Balph MH, Balph DF (1985) On spatial requirements of captive social animals. Anim Behav 33:680–682Google Scholar
  14. Järvi T, Bakken M (1984) The function of the variation in the breast stripe of the great tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 32:590–596Google Scholar
  15. Kroodsma DE (1977) Correlates of song organization among North American wrens. Am Nat 111:995–1008Google Scholar
  16. Lack D (1954) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyon DE, Montgomerie RD (1986) Delayed plumage maturation in passerine birds: reliable signaling by subordinate birds. Evolution 40:605–615Google Scholar
  18. Martin PA, Dzuik PJ (1977) Assessment of relative fertility of males (cockerels and boars) by competitive mating. J Reprod Fert 49:323–329Google Scholar
  19. Martin PA, Reimers TJ, Lodge JR, Dzuik PJ (1974) The effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on the proportion of offspring. J Reprod Fert 39:251–258Google Scholar
  20. Møller AP (1987a) Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim Bchav 35:1637–1644Google Scholar
  21. Møller AP (1987b) Social control of deception among status signalling house sparrows Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:307–311Google Scholar
  22. Møller AP (1987c) House sparrow, Passer domesticus, communal displays. Anim Behav 35:203–210Google Scholar
  23. Møller AP (1988) Badge, body and testes size in House Sparrows Passer domesticus. Ornis Scand (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Parker JF, McKenzie FF, Kempster HL (1940) Observations on the sexual behavior of New Hempshire males. Poultry Sci 19:191–197Google Scholar
  25. Procter-Gray E, Holmes RT (1981) Adaptive significance of delayed attainment of plumage in male American redstarts: tests of two hypotheses. Evolution 35:742–751Google Scholar
  26. Rohwer S (1975) The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution 29:593–610Google Scholar
  27. Rohwer S, Fretwell SD, Niles DM (1980) Delayed maturation in passerine plumages and the deceptive acquisition of resources. Am Nat 115:400–437Google Scholar
  28. Searcy WA (1982) The evolutionary effects of mate choice. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:57–85Google Scholar
  29. Searcy WA (1984) Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows. Behav. Ecol Sociobiol 14:281–286Google Scholar
  30. Searcy WA, Marler P (1981) A test for responsiveness to song structure and programming in female sparrows. Science 213:926–928Google Scholar
  31. Selander RK (1965) On mating systems and sexual selection. Am Nat 99:129–141Google Scholar
  32. Shields WM (1977) The social significance of avian winter plumage variability: a comment. Evolution 31:905–907Google Scholar
  33. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  34. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  35. Studd MV, Robertson RJ (1985) Life span, competition and delayed plumage maturation in male passerines: the breeding threshold hypothesis. Am Nat 126:101–115Google Scholar
  36. Summers-Smith D (1963) The house sparrows. Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Svensson L (1984) Identification guide to European passerines, 3rd edn. Privately published, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  38. Watt DJ (1985) A comparative study of status signalling in sparrows (genus Zonotrichia). Anim Behav 29:593–610Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anders Pape M//oller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations