Summary
Intraspecific allometry of pup mass as a function of maternal mass was analysed in Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella), a highly dimorphic species. The allometric exponent was 0.6, much lower than in interspecific comparisons. Slopes were the same for mother-son pairs as for mother-daughter pairs, but adjusted means were significantly higher for the former, indicating higher reproductive effort of mothers of sons. The correlation of maternal mass with pup mass explained 59% of the variance in female pup mas but only 18% of that in male pup mass. Females appeared to produce sons which were as big as possible. Relative pup mass decreased with increasing maternal mass indicating a lower reproductive effort of bigger and presumably older mothers, contrary to expectations from life history theory. Sex ratio of pups showed no relation to maternal mass.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blueweiss L, Fox H, Kudzma V, Nakashima D, Peters R, Sams S (1978) Relationships between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia (Berl) 37:257–272
Clutton-Brock TH, Albon S, Guinness F (1982) Red deer. Chicago Univ Press, Chicago
Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1984) Comparative approaches to investigating adaptation. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 7–29
Croxall JP, McCann TS, Prince PA, Rothery P (1988) Reproductive performance of seabirds and seals at South Georgia and Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, 1976–1987: implications for Southern Ocean monitoring studies. In: Sahrhage D (ed) Antarctic Ocean Resources Variability. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo (in press)
Doidge DW, Croxall JP, Ricketts C (1984) Growth rates of Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella pups at South Georgia. J Zool Lond 203:87–93
Fedak MA, McCann TS (1987) Parental investment in southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina. Abstract, 7th biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, Miami 1987
Harvey PH, Mace GM (1982) Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends: problems of methodology. In: King's College Sociobiology Group (ed) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 343–362
Horn HS, Rubenstein DI (1984) Behavioural adaptations and life history. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 279–298
Kovacs KM, Lavigne DM (1986) Maternal investment and neonatal growth in Phocid seals. J Anim Ecol 55:1035–1051
LeBoeuf BJ (1974) Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. Am Zool 14:163–176
Leutenegger W (1977) Neonatal-maternal weight relationship in Macaques: an example of intrageneric scaling. Folia Primatol 27:152–159
Martin RD, MacLarnon AM (1985) Gestation period, neonatal size and maternal investment in placental mammals. Nature 313:220–223
Maynard Smith J (1980) A new theory of sexual investment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:247–251
Millar JS (1977) Adaptive features of mammalian reproduction. Evolution 31:370–386
Millar JS (1981) Post partum reproductive characteristics of eutherian mammals. Evolution 35:1149–1163
Payne MR (1979) Growth in the Antarctic fur seal Arctocephalus gazella. J Zool Lond 187:1–20
Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Robbins CT, Robbins BL (1979) Fetal and neonatal growth patterns and maternal reproductive effort in Ungulates and Subungulates. Am Nat 114:101–116
Smith RJ (1980) Rethinking allometry. J Theor Biol 87:97–111
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Heinemann, London, pp 136–179
Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costa, D.P., Trillmich, F. & Croxall, J.P. Intraspecific allometry of neonatal size in the antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus galapagoensis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22, 361–364 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295105
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295105


