Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 429–434 | Cite as

Brood size and fitness in Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae)

  • J. Bartlett
  • C. M. Ashworth


Using a laboratory population of the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae) the effects of body size on fighting ability and reproductive capacity were studied. The outcome of fights for corpses was found to depend on body size and was not related to order of arrival at a corpse. The size of a single clutche on a large corpse and the total of several clutches on a sequence of corpses increased with increasing female size. Larval weight and subsequent adult size for larvae raised on 10 g and 30 g mice were compared. Broods are culled on the smaller mice and light larvae eclose as relatively large adults for their weight; however larvae and adults from small corpses were still lighter and smaller than larvae and adults from 30 g corpses.


Body Size Brood Size Reproductive Capacity Adult Size Female Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bartlett J (1987) Filial cannibalism in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:179–184Google Scholar
  2. Bobek B (1969) Survival, turnover and production of small rodents in a beech forest. Acta Theriol 14:191–202Google Scholar
  3. Caraco T (1980) On foraging time allocation in a stochastic environment. Ecology 61:119–128Google Scholar
  4. Caraco T, Martindale S, Whittam TS (1980) An empirical demonstration of risk sensitive foraging behaviour. Anim Behav 28:820–830Google Scholar
  5. Charnov EL, Krebs JR (1974) On clutch size and fitness. Ibis 116:217–219Google Scholar
  6. Charnov EL, Skinner SW (1984) Evolution of host selection and clutch size in parasitoid wasps. Florida Entomol 67:5–21Google Scholar
  7. Christie J (1981) Mites associated with British burying beetles. PhD thesis, University of LeedsGoogle Scholar
  8. Dantharayana W, Hamilton JG, Khoul SP (1982) Low density larval crowding in the light brown apple moth Epiphyas postvittana and its ecological significance. Entomol Exp Appl 31:353–358Google Scholar
  9. Easton C (1979) The ecology of burying beetles. PhD thesis, University of GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  10. Fabre JH (1919) The glow-worm and other beetles (tr AT de Mattos). Hodder & Stoughton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Halffter G, Anduaga S, Huerta C (1983) Nidification de Nicrophorus. Bull Soc Entomol France 88:648–666Google Scholar
  12. Klomp H, Teerink BJ (1967) The significance of oviposition rates in the egg parasite Trichogramma embryophagum. Arch Neerl Zool 17:350–375Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell R (1975) The evolution of oviposition tactics in the bean weevil Callosobruchus maculatus (F). Ecology 56:696–702Google Scholar
  14. Parker GA, Courtney SP (1984) Models of clutch size in insect oviposition. Theor Popul Biol 26:27–48Google Scholar
  15. Pukowski E (1933) Okologische Untersuchungen and Necrophorus F. Z Morph Ökol Tiere 27:518–596Google Scholar
  16. Real LA (1980) Fitness-uncertainty and the role of diversification in evolutin and behaviour. Am Nat 115:623–638Google Scholar
  17. Rubenstein DI (1987) Alternative reproductive tactics in the spider Meta segmentata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:229–237Google Scholar
  18. Springett BP (1967) The biology of Necrophorus and the mortality of terns (Sterna): an ecological study. PhD thesis, University of DurhamGoogle Scholar
  19. Waage JK, Godfray HCJ (1985) Reproductive strategies and population ecology of insect parasitoids. In: Sibley RM, Smith R (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford (Br Ecol Soc Symp 25:449–470)Google Scholar
  20. Wilson DS, Fudge J (1984) Burying beetles: intraspecific interactions and reproductive success in the field. Ecol Ent 9:195–203Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Bartlett
    • 1
  • C. M. Ashworth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations