Abstract
The objective of this research was to identify chemical, physical, bacteriological, and viral contaminants, and their sources, which present the greatest health threat in public ground water supplies in the USA; and to classify (prioritize) such contaminants and relative to their health concerns. The developed contaminant prioritization methodology was based on frequency of occurrence and adverse health effects. Adverse health effects were based on carcinogenic potency, toxicity, hazardous chemical priorities and drinking water standards. Application of the methodology for wellhead protection areas, (WHPAs) revealed that approximately 200 different contaminants have been detected in the nation's public ground water supplies. The seven chemical constituents with the highest priority were arsenic, chromium, cadmium, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, 1, 1-dichloroethylene, and ethylene dibromide. Other contaminants of concern were trichloroethylene, nitrates, barium, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, benzene, tetrachloroethylene, selenium, lead, toluene, mercury, gross alpha radiation, methylene chloride, coliform bacteria, metolachlor, metribuzin, 1, 1, 2, 2-tetrachloroethane, dibromochloroethane, simazine, radium-266, and toxaphene. The contaminant source prioritization methodology was also based on frequency of occurrence. Over 30 categories of sources were evaluated, with the eight with highest priority including agricultural activities, hazardous waste sites, landfills, industrial operations, septic tank systems, oil and gas field activities, urban land use, and underground storage tanks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Canter, L. W., Knox, R. C. and Fairchild, D. M.: 1987, ‘Pollution Source Prioritization’, Ground Water Quality Protection, Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan, pp. 277–323.
Canter, L. W., Knox, R. C., Sabatini, D. A., Vieux, B. E., Shaw, K. M., Chowdhury, A. K., Overton, D. R. and Kamath, J.: 1992. ‘Ground Water Contaminant Identification and Prioritization’, 2-volume report prepared on Cooperative Agreement CR 819003-01-0, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma (submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma).
Cohenour, D.: 1990, ‘Nitrate Contamination in the Central Oklahoma Aquifer System’, Master's Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Forbes, R.: 1990, ‘Assessment of Nitrate Contamination of Ground Water in the Arkansas River Alluvium in Northwestern Osage County’, Master's Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Lucius, J. E. et al.: 1990 ‘Properties and Hazards of 108 Selected Substances’, Open-File Report 90-408, U.S. Geological Survey, Golden, Colorado.
Office of Technology Assessment: 1984, ‘Protecting the Nation's Groundwater from Contamination’, Vol. I, OTA-O-233, and Vol. II, OTA-0-276, U.S. Congress, Washington, D. C.
Office of Technology Assessment: 1989 ‘Drinking Water — Safeguards Are Not Preventing Contamination From Injected Oil and Gas Wastes’, GAO/RCED-89-97, U.S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D. C.
Office of Technology Transfer and Regulatory Support: 1990, ‘Risk Assessment, Management and Communication of Drinking Water Contamination’, EPA/625/4-89/024, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1987, ‘Guidelines for Delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas’, Office of Ground Water Protection, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1991. ‘Research Plan for Delineating Wellhead Protection Areas Based Upon the Assimilative Capacity of the Subsurface’, EPA-600/RSKERL-Ada-9126, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Ada, Oklahoma.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knox, R.C., Canter, L.W. Prioritization of ground water contaminants and sources. Water Air Soil Pollut 88, 205–226 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294102
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294102