Skip to main content
Log in

Studies of sperm competition in two species of muroid rodents

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    In three experiments on the effects of mating order, wild-type male deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi were tested in competition with brown recessive, wide-band agouti, and blonde mutant males. Females of the homozygous recessive genotype received two ejaculatory series from a male of each genotype; mating order was varied. There were no significant effects of mating order on litter composition. In a parallel experiment wild-type and albino male prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster, mated for one ejaculation each with albino females. There was a significant advantage with respect to litter composition for the male ejaculating last. Together with data from other species, these results suggest that effects of mating order are highly species-specific and must be evaluated for each species before speculations are made regarding the effects of multiple matings.

  2. 2.

    Males of various genotypes differed with respect to differential fertilizing capacity. Wild-type male deer mice outcompeted both brown recessive and wideband agouti males. The combinations of blonde and wild-type deer mice and albino and wild-type prairie voles yielded strain differences in litter composition in one mating order but not in the other. Counts of the numbers of sperm from males of different genotypes in the uteri of females revealed no sigificant strain differences. Thus, strain differences are not simply a function of sperm numbers. 3. Female deer mice mated or exposed to more than one male had a lower probability of pregnancy than those mated for comparable numbers of ejaculations with one male in previous studies. Additional data on pregnancy initiation in females of the brown-recessive genotype mated with one male revealed them to be only slightly less likely to become pregnant than wild-type females. Strain of male had little effect. 4. No significant effects on litter composition were attributable to the length of the delay between matings by successive males. This was established both via correlational analyses of the data from the mating order studies and in an additional experiment in deer mice in which delays of 2 h were imposed between the last ejaculation by the first male and introduction of a second male. 5. Litter composition in deer mice reflects the number of ejaculations attained by each of two males. In one experiment, female deer mice mated first with a blonde male and then with a wild-type male. The blonde male delivered three ejaculations and the wild-type male one ejaculation in one condition and the wild-type male three ejaculations and the blonde male one in the other. Litter composition was significantly affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler NT, Zoloth SR (1970) Copulatory behavior can inhibit pregnancy in female rats. Science 168:1480–1482

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison AJ (1977) Flock mating in sheep. II. Effect of number of ewes per ram on mating behavior and fertility of two-tooth and mixed-age Romney ewes run together. NZ J Agric Res 20:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumngardner DJ, Hartung TG, Sawrey DK, Webster DG, Dewsbury DA (1981) Muroid copulatory plugs and female reproductive tracts: A comparative investigation. J Mammal (in press)

  • Beatty RA (1960) Fertility of mixed semen from different rabbits. J Reprod Fertil 1:52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty RA (1970) The genetics of the mammalian gamete. Biol Rev 45:73–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty RA, Bennett GH, Hall JG, Hancock JL, Steweart DL (1969) An experiment with heterospermic insemination in cattle. J Reprod Fertil 19:491–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernant G (1964) Effects of single and multiple enforced intercopulatory intervals on the sexual behavior of male rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 57:398–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram BCR (1976) Kin selection in lions and in evolution. In: Bateson PPG, Hinde RA (eds) Growing points in ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall DA, Nash D (1973) Occurrence of successful multiple insemination of females in natural populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Evolution 27:106–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorman E, Parker GA (1976) Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age and mating status. Ecol Entomol 1:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley EL, Terman CR (1979) Ovulation in Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi under laboratory conditions. J Mammal 60:543–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronson FH, Eleftheriou BE (1963) Influence of strange males on implantation in the deermouse. Gen Comp Endocrinol 3:515–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce HM (1959) An exteroceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature 184:105

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce HM (1961) Time relations in the pregnancy-block induced in mice by strange males. J Reprod Fertil 2:138–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun JB (1962) The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman RK, Holt JA, Fox KA (1966) Pregnancy failures in laboratory mice after multiple short-term exposure to strange males. Nature 210:653

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens LG (1969) Experimental analysis of sexual behavior of the deermouse, Permyscus maniculatus gambeli. Behaviour 34:267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson WD, Smith MH, Carmon JL (1969) A third independent occurrence of the brown mutant in Peromyscus. J Hered 60:286–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1975) A diallel cross analysis of genetic determinants of copulatory behavior in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 88:713–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1979a) Copulatory behavior of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus): I. Normative data, subspecific differences, and effects of cross-fostering. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1979b) Copulatory behavior of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus): II. A study of some factors regulating the fine structure of behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:161–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1979c) Copulatory behavior of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus): III. Effects on pregnancy initiation. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:178–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1979d) Factor analyses of measures of copulatory behavior in three species of muroid rodents. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:868–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn LC (1927) Selective fertilization in fowls. Poul Sci 6:210–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziuk PJ (1965) Double mating of rabbits to determine capacitation time. J Reprod Fertil 10:389–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds S, Zoloth SR Adler NT (1972) Storage of copulatory stimulation in the female rat. Physiol Behav 8:161–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RG (1955) Selective fertilization following the use of sperm mixtures in the mouse. Nature 175:215–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch HS (1957) Aspects of reproduction and development in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 10:129–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Foltz DW (1981) Genetic evidence for long-term monogamy in a small rodent, Peromyscus polionotus. Am Nat 117:665–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz LL (1978) Speculation on social structure and population cycles of microtine rodents. Biologist 60:134–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray GD, Dewsbury DA (1973) A quantitative description of copulatory behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Brain Behav Evol 8:437–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1981) Male mating effort, confidence of paternity and insect sperm competition. In: Smith RL (ed), Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung TG, Dewsbury DA (1978) A comparative analysis of copulatory plugs in muroid rodents and their relationship to copulatory behavior. J Mammal 59:717–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes HB (1974) Patterns of sperm competition in Nasonia vitripennis. Can J Genet Cytol 16:789–795

    Google Scholar 

  • King HB (1929) Selective fertilization in the rat. Wilhelm Roux' Arch Entwicklungsmech Org 116:202–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier DL, Estep DO, Dewsbury DA (1979) Role of prolonged copulatory behavior in facilitating reproductive success in a competitive mating situation in laboratory rats J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:781–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine L (1967) Sexual selection in mice. IV. Experimental demonstration of selective fertilization. Am Nat 101:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JE (1979) Mating behavior and natural selection. Fla Entomol 62:17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod J (1973) The parameters of male fertility. Hosp Pract 8:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Martan J, Shepherd BA (1976) The role of the copulatory plug in reproduction of the guinea pig. J Exp Zool 196:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PA, Dziuk PJ (1977) Assessment of relative fertility of males (cockerels and boars) by competitive mating. J Reprod Fertil 49:323–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PA, Reimers TJ, Lodge JR, Dziuk PJ (1974) The effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on proportions of offspring. J Reprod Fertil 39:251–258

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill TE (1962) Sexual behavior in three inbred strains of mice. Behaviour 19:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt RB, Wu BJ (1975) On the quantification of promiscuity (or Promyscus maniculatus?). Evolution 29:575–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosig DW, Dewsbury DA (1970) Plug fate in the copulatory behavior of male rats. Psychon Sci 20:315–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Oglesby JM, Lanier DL, Dewsbury DA (1981) The role of prolonged copulatory behavior in facilitating reproductive success in male Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) in a competitive mating situation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Prout T, Bundegaard J (1977) The population genetics of sperm displacement. Genetics 85:95–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond M, Conaway CH (1969a) Induced ovulation and oestrus in Microtus ochrogaster. Reprod Fertil Suppl 6:357–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond M, Conaway CH (1969b) Management, breeding, and reproductive performance of the vole, Microtus ochrogaster, in a laboratory colony. Lab Anim Care 19:80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins RJ (1979) “Blonde” mutants. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University

  • Robitaille JA, Bovet J (1976) Field observations on the social behaviour of the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhout). Biol Behav 1:289–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Cade WH (1980) Female mating frequency and progeny production in singly and doubly mated house and field crickets. Can J Zool 58:404–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims SR (1979) Aspects of mating frequency and reproductive maturity in Papilio zelicaon. Am Midl Nat 102:36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1979) Repeated copulation and sperm precedence: Paternity assurance for a male brooding water bug. Science 205:1029–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumption LJ, Adams JC (1961) Multiple sire mating in swine III. Factors influencing multiple paternity. J Hered 52:214–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Telle HJ (1966) Contribution to the knowledge of behavioral patterns in two species of rats, Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus. Z Angew Zool 53:129–196 (Technical translation 1608 (VN Nekrassoff, trans) National Research Council of Canada 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Birney EC (1979) Parental care and mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin CEG (1979) Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventura WF, Freund M (1973) Evidence for a new class of uterine stimulants in rats semen and male accessory gland secretions. J Reprod Fertil 33:507–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss R (1979) Male accessory glands and the evolution of copulatory plugs in rodents. Occas Pap Mus Zool Univ Mich 689:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:780–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes A (1966) Sperm utilization following multiple insemination in the wasp Dahlbominus fuscipennis. Can J Genet Cytol 8:451–461

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dewsbury, D.A., Baumgardner, D.J. Studies of sperm competition in two species of muroid rodents. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9, 121–133 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293583

Keywords

Navigation