Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for chromosomal replicons as units of sister chromatid exchanges

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chromosomal replicons have been described as the cytological counterpart of DNA replicon clusters and have previously been studied in vitro using premature chromosome condensation-sister chromatid differentiation (PCC-SCD) techniques. Chromosomal replicons are visualized as small SCD segments in S-phase cells, and measurement of these segments can provide estimates of relative chromosomal replicon size corresponding to DNA replicon clusters functioning coordinately in S-phase. Current hypotheses of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) formation postulate that sites of SCE induction are associated with active replicons or replicon clusters. We have applied the PCC-SCD technique to in vivo studies of mouse bone marrow cells that have been treated with cyclophosphamide (CP) for two cell cycles. We have been able to visualize chromosomal replicons, as well as SCEs which have been induced in vivo by CP treatment, simultaneously in the same cells. Chromosomal replicons visualized as small SCD segments were measured in PCC cells classified at early or late S-phase based on SCD segment size prevalence. Early S-phase (E/S) PCC cells contained 90% of the SCD segments measured clustered in a segment size range of 0.1 to 0.8 μm with a peak value around 0.3 to 0.6 μm regardless of CP treatment. As the cells progressed through S-phase, late S-phase (L/S) PCC cells were characterized by the appearance of larger SCD segments and even whole SCD chromosomes in addition to small SCD segments. A concentration of units around 0.4 to 1.0 μm was found for L/S SCD segment size distributions regardless of CP treatment with an apparent bimodal profile. Our in vivo data support the existence of a subunit organization of chromosomal replication with a basic functional unit being 0.3 to 0.6 μm in size. In addition, we have found that this chromosomal unit of replication or “chromosomal replicon” does not seem to be functionally perturbed by the mutagen CP. We also found that small SCD segments of 0.4 to 0.7 μm in length were involved in the formation of an SCE, suggesting that both spontaneous and CP-induced SCEs occur between chromosomal replicons. These findings provide direct cytogenetic evidence to support a replicon cluster/chromosomal replicon model for SCE formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberts DS, Peng YM, Chen HS, Struck RF (1978) Effect of phenobarbital on plasma levels of cyclophosphamide and its metabolites in the mouse. Br J Cancer 38:316–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen JW, Shuler CF, Mendes RW, Latt SA (1977) A simplified technique for in vivo analysis of sister chromatid exchanges using 5-bromodeoxyuridine tablets. Cytogenet Cell Genet 18:231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi G, Olofsson B, Filipski J, Zerial M, Salinas J, Cuny G, Meunier-Rotival M, Rodier F (1985) The mosaic genome of warm-blodded vertebrates. Science 228:953–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver JE (1981) Correlations between sister chromatid exchange frequencies and replicon sizes. Exp Cell Res 136:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Goto K, Maeda S, Kano Y, Sugiyama T (1978) Factors involved in differential giemsa-staining of sister chromatids. Chromosoma 66:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand R (1978) Eukaryotic DNA: organization of the genome for replication. Cell 15:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist GP (1987) Role of replication time in the control of tissue-specific gene expression. Am J Hum Genet 40:151–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman JA, Riggs AD (1968) On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes. J Mol Biol 32:327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RT, Rao PN (1970) Mammalian cell fusion: induction of premature chromosome condensation in interphase nuclei. Nature 226:717–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA (1973) Microfluorometric detection of DNA replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3395–3399

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Allen JW, Rogers WE, Juergens LA (1977) In vitro and in vivo analysis of sister chromatid exchange formation. In: Kilbey BJ, Legator M, Nichols R, Ramel C (eds) Handbook of mutagenicity test procedures. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 275–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Allen J, Bloom SE, Carrano A, Falke E, Kram D, Schneider E, Schreck R, Tice R, Whitfield B, Wolff S (1981) Sister-chromatid exchanges: a report of the gene-tox program. Mutat Res 87:17–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau YF, Arrighi FE (1980) Studies of mammalian chromosome replication. I. BrdU-induced differential staining patterns in interphase and metaphase chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 27:176–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau YF, Arrighi FE (1981) Studies of mammalian chromosome replication. II. evidence for the existence of defined chromosome replicating units. Chromosoma 83:721–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau YF, Hittleman WM, Arrighi FE (1976) Sister chromatid differential staining pattern in prematurely condensed chromosomes. Experientia 32:917–919

    Google Scholar 

  • McFee AF, Lowe KW, San Sebastian JR (1983) Improved sister chromatid differentiation using paraffin coated bromodeoxyuridine tablets in mice. Mutat Res 119:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter RB (1980) A replication model for sister chromatid exchange. Mutat Res 70:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry PE (1980) Chemical mutagens and sister chromatid exchange. In: Hollaender A (ed) Chemical mutagens-principles and methods for their detection, vol 6. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J, Hoffman J (1967) Cell renewal patterns. N Engl J Med 279:248–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao PN, Johnson RT (1974) Induction of chromosome condensation in interphase cells. Adv Cell Mol Biol 3:135–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg AA (1982) Sister chromatid exchange. In: Sandberg AA (ed) Progress and topics in cytogenetics. vol 2. Alan R. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice R, Hollaender A (1984) Sister chromatid exchanges. In: Hollaender AA (ed) Basic life sciences, vol 29A and vol 29B. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S (1977) Sister chromatid exchange. Annu Rev Genet 11:183–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S (1982) Sister chromatid exchange. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S, Bodycote J, Painter RB (1974) Sister chromatid exchanges induced in Chinese hamster cells by UV irradiation of different stages of the cell cycle: the necessity for cells to pass through S. Mutat Res 25:73–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lugo, M.H., Rauchfuss, H.S., Zakour, H.R. et al. Evidence for chromosomal replicons as units of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 98, 69–76 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293337

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293337

Keywords

Navigation