Skip to main content
Log in

Insect disturbance stridulation: Its Defensive role

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Many insects stridulate when they are handled or attacked. It has been suggested that this disturbance stridulation acts to deter predators. This hypothesis was investigated in a series of experiments. Predators were given insects which had been silenced by disruption of their sound-producing mechanism or else had been sham operated but retained their normal ability to stridulate.

  2. 2.

    Three types of insects (mutillid wasps, Dasymutilla spp.; water scavenger beetles, Tropisternus spp.; and round sand beetles, Omophron labiatus) were given to wolf spiders (Lycosa ceratiola and Geolycosa ornatipes) at night in the field under natural conditions. When attacking silenced insects, spiders displayed greater persistence than when attacking phonic insects (Table 1). In addition, mortality was greater among silenced insects.

  3. 3.

    Spiders (L. ceratiola) were also given an artificial ‘insect’—a vibrating probe whose vibration mimicked that of the cuticle of a stridulating insect. As with real insects, spiders persisted longer in their attack on the probe when it was silent than when it was ‘stridulating”.

  4. 4.

    Female mutillid wasps were given to wild-caught mice (Peromyscus floridanus) in the laboratory. Unsilenced mutillids survived the encounter more often than their silenced counterparts. In another experiment, the stings of mutillid wasps were removed before testing. Mice killed nearly all these ‘unprotected’ mutillids. However, it took mice significantly longer to attack unsilenced mutillids and longer to kill them after initiating the assault (Table 2).

  5. 5.

    These results support the view that insect disturbance stridulation deters predators. Two modes of action by which these sounds may have their effect are discussed: they may serve to startle the attacker or they may alert it to the potential harmfulness of the insect and as such may qualify as an example of acoustic aposematism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, A.J.: On the stridulation of scorpions. Behaviour 12, 339–352 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R.D.: Acoustical communication in arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 12, 494–526 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F.G.: Ein einzelnes Spaltsinnesorgan auf dem Spinnentarsus: seine Erregung in Abhängigkeit von Parametern des Luftschallreizes. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 55, 407–449 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T.: Experimente zur Frage der biologischen Bedeutung des Stridulationsverhaltens von Käfern. Z. Tierpsychol. 42, 57–65 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blest, A.D.: The function of eyespot patterns in the Lepidoptera. Behaviour 11, 209–256 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, M.F.: Stridulation and defensive behaviour in the ground beetle Cychrus caraboides (L.). J. Entomol. [A] 49, 7–15 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, W.E., Masters, W.M.: Infrared video viewing. Science 199, 1004 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, 2nd ed., p. 311. New York: Appleton 1874

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumortier, B.: L'Émission sonore dans le genre Gromphadorhina Brunner (Blattodea, Perisphaeriidae), étude morphologique et biologique. Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 90, 89–101 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D.C.: Warning sounds of moths. Z. Tierpsychol. 25, 129–138 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D.C., Roeder, K.D.: Moth sounds and the insect catching behavior of bats. Science 147, 173–174 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, M.: Defence in animals: A survey of anti-predator defences. Harlow, Essex: Longman 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Aneshansley, D., Eisner, M., Rutowski, R., Chong, B., Meinwald, J.: Chemical defense and sound production in Australian tenebrionid beetles (Adelium spp.). Psyche 81, 189–208 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frings, E., Frings, M.: Reactions of orb-weaving spiders (Argiopidae) to airborne sounds. Ecology 47, 578–588 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, D.M.: Sound production and reception in a cockroach. J. Exp. Biol. 45, 321–328 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, P.T.: Insect sounds. Chicago: Quadrangle Books 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Liesenfeld, F.J.: Über Leistung und Sitz des Erschütterungssinnes von Netzspinnen. Biol. Zentrabl. 80, 465–476 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, F.C.: Insectotheologia, p. 314. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Michael Blochberger 1738

    Google Scholar 

  • McCue, J.J.G., Bertolini, A.: A portable receiver for ultrasonic waves in air. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. SU-11, 41–49 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G.A.K.: Experimental evidence of terror caused by the squeak of Acherontia atrops. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond., 402 (1902a)

  • Marshall, G.A.K.: Insect stridulation as a warning or intimidating character. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond., 404 (1902b)

  • Masters, W.M.: Irradiance modulation used to examine sound-radiating cuticular motion in insects. Science 203, 57–60 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, R.I.: How and why scorpions hiss. Nat. Sci. (Lond.) 9, 17–25 (1896)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildknecht, H., Maschwitz, U., Winkler, H.: Zur Evolution der Carabiden-Wehrdrüsensekrete. Naturwissenschaften 55, 112–117 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J.O., Blum, M.S.: Adaptations and responses of Dasymutilla occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) to predators. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 21, 99–111 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S.: Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York-Toronto-London: McGraw Hill 1956

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.L., Langley, W.M.: Cicada stress sound: An assay of its effectiveness as a predator defense mechanism. Southwest. Nat. 23, 187–196 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G.: Statistical methods, 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, C.: A spider's vibration receptor: Its anatomy and physiology. Am. Zool. 9, 133–144 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J.W., Chung, R.H., Oh, S.K., Benfield, E.F., Neff, S.E.: Defensive secretions of cychrine beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63, 469–471 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Winking-Nikolay, A.: Untersuchungen zur Bio-Akustik des Waldmistkäfers, Geotrupes stercorosus Scriba. Z. Tierpsychol. 37, 515–541 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell Masters, W. Insect disturbance stridulation: Its Defensive role. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5, 187–200 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293305

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293305

Keywords

Navigation