Skip to main content
Log in

Supernumerary chromosome variation and heterochromatin distribution in the endemic New Zealand frog Leiopelma hochstetteri

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Specimens of the endemic New Zealand frog Leiopelma hochstetteri from Tapu on North Island were found to have six, nine or ten supernumerary chromosomes in their karyotypes. In comparison with previously published data, these results further indicate probable geographic variation in supernumerary chromosome number between populations. Increased numbers of supernumeraries in these frogs is correlated with apparent decrease of centromeric heterochromatin in the five large metacentric chromosomes of the karyotype, as detected by C-banding. Meiosis was abnormal in a male with a high number of supernumeraries. In lampbrush preparations from a single female with one supernumerary univalent, the supernumerary often had a denser, beaded appearance in comparison with the regular bivalents. Evidence is consistent with the notion that these supernumerary chromosomes may have arisen from centromeric fragments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baverstock PR, Watts CHS, Hogarth JT (1976) Heterochromatin variation in the Australian rodent Uromys caudimaculatus. Chromosoma 57:397–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell BD (1982) The amphibian fauna of New Zealand. In: Newman DG (ed) New Zealand herpetology. New Zealand Wildlife Service, Wellington, pp 27–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell BD (1986) The conservation status of New Zealand wildlife. Occ Publ N-Z Wildlife Serv 12:1–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogart JP (1981) Chromosome studies in Sminthillus from Cuba and Eleutherodactylus from Cuba and Puerto Rico (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Life Sci Contrib R Ontario Museum 129:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Dev VG, Miller DA, Tantravani RR, Schreck RR, Roderick TH, Erlanger BF, Miller OJ (1976) Chromosome markers in Mus musculus: differences in C-banding between the subspecies M. m. musculus and M. m. molossinus. Chromosoma 53:335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) The biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York, p 670

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM (1985) Differentiation in amount of centromeric heterochromatin between subspecies of the red-legged frog, Rana aurora. Copeia 1985:1071–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Bogart JP, Anthony EH, Genner DL (1980) An interactive, microcomputer based karyotype analysis system for phylogenetic cytotaxonomy. Comput Biol Med 10:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Kezer J, Nussbaum RA (1984a) Triploidy in Hochstetter's frog Leiopelma hochstetteri from New Zealand. NZ J Zool 11:457–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Myers PZ, Reyna DL (1984b) CHROMPAC III: an improved package for micro-computer assisted analysis of karyotypes. J Hered 75:143

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AW, Hewitt GM (1979) B-chromosomes slow development in a grasshopper. Heredity 42:397–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN, Rees H (1982) B-Chromosomes. Academic Press, New York, p 266

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezer J, Sessions SK (1979) Chromosome variation in the plethodontid salamander Aneides ferreus. Chromosoma 71:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezer J, Léon PE, Sessions SK (1980) Structural differentiation of the meiotic and mitotic chromosomes of the salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum. Chromosoma 81:177–197

    Google Scholar 

  • King M (1980) C-banding studies on Australian hylid frogs: Secondary constriction structure and the concept of euchromatin transformation. Chromosoma 80:191–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan A, Fredga D, Sandberg AA (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi A (1967) The karyotype of two specimens of Leiopelma hochstetteri Fitz. (Amphibia Salientia). Caryologia 21:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi A (1973) Amphibia. In: Chiarelli A, Capanna E (eds) Cytotaxonomy and vertebrate evolution. Academic Press, New York, pp 233–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton JL (1977) B-chromosome systems in the pocket mouse, Perognathus baileyi: Meiosis and C-band studies. Chromosoma 60:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker JS, Ainsworth CC, Taylor S (1981) The B-chromosome system of Hypochoeris maculata II. B-effects on meiotic Achromosome behaviour. Chromosoma 67:123–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M (1978) Chromosome banding in amphibia I. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer regions in Bufo and Hyla. Chromosoma 66:361–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M (1983) Chromosome banding in Amphibia. VII. Analysis of the structure and variability of NORs in Anura. Chromosoma 87:327–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions SK (1984) Cytogenetics and evolution in salamanders. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson EM, Robinson ES, Stephenson NG (1972) Karyotype variation within the genus Leiopelma (Amphibia: Anura). Can J Genet Cytol 14:691–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson EM, Robinson ES, Stephenson NG (1974) Inter-specific relationships of Leiopelma (Amphibia: Anura). Further karyological evidence: Experientia 30:1248–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosida TH, Sagai T (1975) Variation of C-bands in the chromosomes of several subspecies of Rattus rattus. Chromosoma 50:283–300

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, D.M., Kezer, J. & Nussbaum, R.A. Supernumerary chromosome variation and heterochromatin distribution in the endemic New Zealand frog Leiopelma hochstetteri . Chromosoma 95, 339–344 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293180

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293180

Keywords

Navigation