Skip to main content
Log in

Predation risk and foraging behavior of the hoary marmot in Alaska

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

I observed hoary marmots for three field seasons to determine how the distribution of food and the risk of predation influenced marmots' foraging behavior. I quantified the amount of time Marmota caligata foraged in different patches of alpine meadows and assessed the distribution and abundance of vegetation eaten by marmots in these meadows. Because marmots dig burrows and run to them when attacked by predators, marmot-toburrow distance provided an index of predation risk that could be specified for different meadow patches.

Patch use correlated positively with food abundance and negatively with predation risk. However, these significant relationships disappeared when partial correlations were calculated because food abundance and risk were intercorrelated. Using multiple regression, 77.0% of the variance in patch use was explained by a combination of food abundance, refuge burrow density, and a patch's distance from the talus where sleeping burrows were located. Variations in vigilance behavior (look-ups to search for predators while feeding) according to marmots' ages, the presence of other conspecifics, and animals' proximity to their sleeping burrows all indicated that predation risk influenced foraging.

In a forage-manipulation experiment, the use of forage-enhanced patches increased six-fold, verifying directly the role of food availability on patch used. Concomitant with increased feeding, however, was the intense construction of refuge burrows in experimental patches that presumably reduced the risk of feeding. Thus, I suggest that food and predation risk jointly influence patch use by hoary marmots and that both factors must be considered when modeling the foraging behavior of species that can be predator and prey simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen DC, Armitage KB, Hoffmann RS (1976) Socioecology of marmots: female reproductive strategies. Ecology 57:552–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony M (1962) Activity and behavior of the woodchuck in southern Illinois. Occas Pap Adams Ctr Ecol Stud 6:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage KB (1962) Social behaviour of a colony of the yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris). Anim Behav 10:319–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage KB (1979) Food selectivity by yellow-bellied marmots. J Mammal 60:628–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage KB (1982) Marmots and coyotes: behavior of prey and predator. J Mammal 63:503–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage KB, Downhower JF (1974) Demography of yellow-bellied marmot populations. Ecology 55:1233–1245

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage KB, Downhower JF, Svendsen GE (1976) Seasonal changes in weights of marmots. Am Midl Nat 96:36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP (1973) The social biology of the Olympic marmot. Anim Behav Monogr 6:173–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP (1974) The social behavior of the hoary marmot (Marmota caligata). Anim Behav 22:256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP (1975) Marmot alarm calling and the question of altruistic behavior. Am Midl Nat 94:468–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP (1980) The influence of reproductive status on foraging by hoary marmots (Marmota caligata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1978) Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theor Popul Biol 14:105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjugstad AJ, Crawford HS, Neal DL (1970) Determining forage consumption by direct observation of domestic animals. In: Range and wildlife habitat eval. US Dept Agric Forest Serv Misc Publ No 1147. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock HM (1972) Social statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss LC, Courtin GM, Pattie DL, Riewe RR, Whitfield DWA, Widden P (1973) Arctic tundra ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:359–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey HV (1983) Foraging and nutritional ecology of yellow-bellied marmots in the White Mountains of California. PhD thesis. University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerri RD, Fraser DF (1983) Predation and risk in foraging minnows: balancing conflicting demands. Am Nat 121:552–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: attach strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Covich A (1976) Analyzing shapes of foraging areas: some ecological and economic theories. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:235–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering HK, van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analysis. US Dept Agric Handbook No 379. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977) Optimal foraging and the size selection of worms by redshank, Tringa totanus, in the field. Anim Behav 25:10–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizzell RA (1955) A study of the southern woodchuck, Marmota monax monax. Am Midl Nat 53:257–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RM (1975) Foods of the hoary marmot on Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Am Midl Nat 94:348–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RM, Flinders JT (1969) Food habits of North American hares. Colo State Univ Range Sci Dept Sci Ser 1

  • Holechek JL, Vavra M, Pieper RD (1982) Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review. J Range Manage 35:309–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG (1979) Social behavior and foraging strategies of hoary marmots (Marmota caligata) in Alaska. PhD thesis, University of Washington, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG (1984) The ecological basis of monogamy in Alaskan hoary marmots. In: Murie JO, Michener GR (eds) Biology of ground-dwelling squirrels: annual cycles, behavioral ecology, and sociality. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland JL (1979) The effect of colony size on individual alertness of prairie dogs (Sciuridae: Cynomys spp.). Anim Behav 27:394–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland JL (1981) The evolution of coloniality in white-tailed and black-tailed prairie dogs (Sciuridae: Cynomys leucurus and C. ludovicianus). Ecology 62:252–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns DW, Armitage KB (1979) Behavioral ecology of alpine yellow-bellied marmots. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:133–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC, Sargent TD (1981) Foraging behavior: ecological, ethological, and psychological approaches. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass, pp 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Nature 275:642–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyes DH, Holmes WG (1979) Behavioral responses of freeliving hoary marmots to a model golden eagle. J Mammal 60:408–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Olendorff RR (1976) The food habits of the golden eagle. Am Midl Nat 95:230–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1981) Why hummingbirds hover and honeyeaters perch. Anim Behav 29:861–867

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1980) Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands. Science 210:1041–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect, Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 63:786–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen GE (1974) Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot population. Ecology 55:760–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1974) Optimal foraging and size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis mochrochirus). Ecology 55:1042–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M (1974) An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. Am Nat 108:290–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Willhite FM, Rouse HK, Miller DE (1955) High altitude meadows in Colorado III: the effect of nitrogen fertilization on crude protein production. Agron J 47:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood WA (1973) Habitat selection and energetics of the Olympic marmot. Ms thesis, Western Washington University, Bellingham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, W.G. Predation risk and foraging behavior of the hoary marmot in Alaska. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15, 293–301 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292992

Keywords

Navigation