Skip to main content
Log in

Male copulatory guarding enhances female foraging in a water strider

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the laboratory, females of Gerris remigis foraging singly after being separated from a copulating male averaged 16 times longer to repel male copulatory attempts compared to repelling time when copulating (60 trials). In<10 min after separation, all females either became immobile at the edge (in 34% of all trials), or recopulated and either continued to forage (61%) or swam to the edge and became immobile (5%). Copulating females captured 85% of imitation prey, but single females, harassed by males, captured only 32% of prey.

During a census of 2 small streams, in the pools with swimming single males, >99% of all swimming females were copulating, <1% being single. Ninety seven percent of all single females were immobile at the edge, whereas only 11% of all pairs were at the edge. In pools without swimming single males, 32% of all single females were swimming, compared to <1% in pools with swimming males. Introductions of a male into 4 pools with a female swimming singly in each resulted in the females either becoming immobile at the edge or copulating. The 2 streams had a ♂:♀ sex ratio of 1.6:1, and 79% of all females were copulating during the census. Foraging, copulation and copulatory attempts continued at a reduced level during the night.

Thus in streams where male G. remigis are attempting to copulate, females can forage effectively only by carrying a copulating male who apparently repels copulatory attempts by other males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrows EM, Chabot MR, Michener CD, Snyder TP (1976) Foraging and mating behavior in Perdita texana. J Kans Entomol Soc 49:275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckwort GC, Ginsberg HS (1980) Foraging and mating behavior in Apoidea. Annu Rev Entomol 25:421–426

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain KD (1981) Interference competition and mate choice in the soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pennsylvanicus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:65–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthey W (1975) Observations sur la reproduction de Gerris remigis Say. (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 48:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Courtship persistence and female-guarding as male time investment strategies. Behaviour 48:157–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL (1982) Epigamic selection by males as evidenced by courtship partner preferences in the checkered white butterfly (Pieris protodice). Anim Behav 30:108–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL, Alcock J (1980) Temporal variation in male copulatory behaviour in the solitary bee Nomadopsis puellae (Hymenoptera Andrenidae). Behaviour 73:175–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1976) Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). Am Nat 110:529–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:780–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS (1979) Sex discrimination in Gerris remigis: role of a surface wave signal. Science 206:1325–1327

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilcox, R.S. Male copulatory guarding enhances female foraging in a water strider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15, 171–174 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292971

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292971

Keywords

Navigation