Skip to main content
Log in

A cytogenetic investigation of DNA rereplication after hydroxyurea treatment: implications for gene amplification

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the mechanisms leading to gene amplification are poorly understood, it has recently been proposed that the initial event of amplification is the rereplication of a variable, but relatively large, amount of the genome within a single cell cycle. We sought evidence for rereplication of DNA as a basis for gene amplification through two cytogenetic techniques: differential staining for sister-chromatid exchange analysis and premature chromosome condensation. Synchronized Chinese hamster ovary cells were incubated continuously with bromodeoxyuridine and treated with hydroxyurea (HU) when cells were approximately 2 h into the S phase. After 6 h exposure to HU, the drug was removed and at 3 h intervals thereafter metaphase cells were collected and the chromosomes were stained by the fluorescence-plus-Giemsa procedure. No staining patterns consistent with rereplication of DNA were observed. Since HU causes cytogenetic damage, the premature chromosome condensation technique was used to determine the kinetics of chromosome damage after removal of HU. Extensive G2 chromosome damage within 1 h after removal of HU from the medium was found, although cesium chloride gradient analysis showed that there was no rereplication of DNA during this time. Contrary to a previous report, these results provide no evidence that incubation of cells with HU during S phase induces rereplication of DNA within a single cell cycle. The results observed are consistent with the hypothesis that drug-induced aberrations and the subsequent abnormal segregation of chromosomal fragments are the first steps in the process that leads to gene amplification in drug-treated mammalian cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alt FW, Kellems RE, Bertino JR, Schimke RT (1978) Selective multiplication of dihydrofolate reductase genes in methotrexate-resistant variants of cultured murine cells. J Biol Chem 253:1357–1370

    Google Scholar 

  • Botcham M, Topp W, Sambrook J (1978) Studies on Simian virus 40 excision from cellular chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 43:709–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown PC, Tlsty TD, Schimke RT (1983) Enhancement of methotrexate resistance and dihydrofolate reductase gene amplification by treatment of mouse 3T6 cells with hydroxyurea. Mol Cell Biol 3:1097–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn P, Kapp LN, Morgan WF, Painter RB (1986) Chromosomal changes without DNA overproduction in hydroxyurea-treated mammalian cells. Cancer Res (submitted)

  • Johnson RT, Collins ARS, Waldren CA (1982) Prematurely condensed chromosomes and the analysis of DNA and chromosome lesions. In: Rao PN, Johnson RT, Sperling K (eds) Premature chromosome condensation. Academic Press, New York, pp 253–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman RJ, Sharp PA, Latt SA (1983) Evolution of chromosomal regions containing transfected and amplified dihydrofolate reductase sequences. Mol Cell Biol 699–711

  • Latt SA (1973) Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3395–3399

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariani BD, Schimke RT (1984) Gene amplification in a single cell cycle in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem 259:1901–1910

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WF, Wolff S (1984) Induction of sister chromatid exchange by 3-aminobenzamide is independent of bromodeoxyuridine. Cytogenet Cell Genet 38:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantelias GE, Maillie HD (1983) A simple method for premature chromosome condensation induction in primary human and rodent cells using polyethylene glycol. Somatic Cell Genet 9:533–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Timson J (1975) Hydroxyurea. Mutat Res 32:115–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, W.F., Bodycote, J., Fero, M.L. et al. A cytogenetic investigation of DNA rereplication after hydroxyurea treatment: implications for gene amplification. Chromosoma 93, 191–196 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292737

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292737

Keywords

Navigation