Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 211–216 | Cite as

Sexual selection in a monomorphic lek-breeding bird: correlates of male mating success in the great snipe Gallinago media

  • Jacob Höglund
  • Arne Lundberg
Article

Summary

In the lek-breeding great snipe, male morphology, behaviour, and territory features were recorded for individually marked birds on two adjacent leks. Partial correlation sshowed that male mating success, expressed as the number of female solicitations and copulations, was negatively correlated with the distance of a display territory to the lek center and positively correlated with the number of displays per unit time given by a male. No other variables were directly correlated with male matin success. Thus, central males obtain more matings than peripheral males and successful males display more per unit time than do less successful males, independently of position on the lek. Central males were found to be older than peripheral ones and were present more often on the lek. Furthermore, central males had a larger number of white tail feathers, which are usea as visual signals in the displays, but this may be explained by the fact that these males were older. It is suggested that male great snipe are subject to sexual selection mainly in behavioural and vocal cues and that this may explain the absence of size and plumage dimorphism in this species.

Keywords

Partial Correlation Sexual Selection Visual Signal Mating Success Male Mating Success 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson M (1982) Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisment. Biol J Linn Soc 17:375–393Google Scholar
  2. Avery M, Sherwood G (1982) The lekking behaviour of Great snipe. Ornis Scand 13:72–78Google Scholar
  3. Ballard WB, Robel RJ (1974) Reproductive importance of dominant male greater prairie chickens. Auk 91:75–85Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behaviour, recent research and new theory. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–173Google Scholar
  5. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies NB (1978) Ecological questions about territorial behaviour. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, London, pp 317–351Google Scholar
  7. Elveland J, Tjernberg M (1984) Vegetationsförhållanden på några spelplaster för dubbelbeckasin (Gallinago media) i västra Härjedalen och södra Lappland. (The vegetation on some display grounds of the great snipe, Gallinago media, in Sweden.). Memoranda Soc Fauna Flora Fennica 60:125–140Google Scholar
  8. Ferdinand L (1966) Display of the great snipe (Gallinago media Latham). Dansk Orn Foren Tidskr 60:14–34Google Scholar
  9. Ferdinand L, Gensbol B (1966) Maintenance of terriotory in the Great snipe (Gallinago media Latham) on the display ground. Dansk Orn For Tidskr 60:35–43Google Scholar
  10. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Bchav Ecol Sociobiol 18:117–123Google Scholar
  11. Gilliard ET (1962) On the breeding behaviour of the cock-of-the-rock (Aves, Rupicola rupicola). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 124:31–68Google Scholar
  12. Hjorth I (1970) Reproductive behaviour in Tetraonidae, with special reference to males. Viltrevy 7:183–596Google Scholar
  13. Hogan-Warburg AJ (1966) Social behaviour of the ruff Philomachus pugnax (L.). Ardea 54:109–229Google Scholar
  14. James FC, McCulloch CE (1985) Data analysis and the design of experiments in ornithology. In: Johnston RF (ed) Current ornithology, vol 2. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–63Google Scholar
  15. Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12Google Scholar
  16. Kruijt JP, Vos GJ de, Bossema I (1972) The arena system of the black grouse (Lyrurus tetrix (L.)). Proceedings of the 15th International Ornithological Congress, pp 399–423Google Scholar
  17. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 78:3721–3725Google Scholar
  18. Lemnell PA (1978) Social behaviour of the great snipe Capella media at the arena display. Ornis Scand 9:146–163Google Scholar
  19. Lill A (1974a) Social organisation and space utilization in the lek forming white-bearded manakin, M. manacus trinitatis Hartert. Z Tierpsychol 36:513–530Google Scholar
  20. Lill A (1974b) Sexual behaviour of the lek-forming whitebearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Hartert). Z Tierpsychol 36:1–36Google Scholar
  21. Lill A (1976) Lek behaviour in the golden-headed manakin, Pipra erytrocephala, in Trinidad (West Indies). Z Tierpsychol Supplement 18:1–83Google Scholar
  22. Moyles DLJ, Boag DA (1981) Where, when and how male sharp tailed grouse establish territories on arenas. Can J Zool 59:1576–1581Google Scholar
  23. O'Donald P (1980) Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Parker GA (1982) Phenotype-limited evolutionary stable strategies. In: Bertram BR, Clutton-Brock TH, Dunbar RIM, Rubenstein DI, Wrangham R (eds) Current problems in sociobiology. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166Google Scholar
  26. Payne RB (1984) Sexual selection, lek and arena behaviour, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Orn Monogr 33:1–52Google Scholar
  27. Prater T, Marchant J, Vuorinen J (1977) Guide to the identification and ageing of holarctic waders. British Trust for Ornithology, TringGoogle Scholar
  28. SAS Institute Inc. (1985) SAS user's guide: basics version, 5th ed. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  29. Shephard JM (1976) Factors influencing female choice in the lek mating system of the ruff. Living Bird 87–111Google Scholar
  30. Swanberg PO (1965) Studies of less familiar birds 138. Great snipe. British Birds 58:504–508Google Scholar
  31. Svensson L (1975) Identification guide to European passerines. Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  32. Tuck LM (1972) The snipes: a study of the genus Capella. Can Wildl Serv Monogr Ser 5:1–429Google Scholar
  33. Vos GJ de, Bruinsma OH (1985) Rookoing and mate choice in black grouse; a field study. Poster presented at the 19th International Ethological Conference, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiley RH (1973) Territoriality and non-random mating in Sage grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus. Anim Behav Monogr 6:85–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob Höglund
    • 1
  • Arne Lundberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations