Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine substitution on sister chromatid exchange induction by chemicals

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fluorescence-plus-Giemsa (FPG) technique for analysis of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) is widely used as an assay for mutagenic carcinogens. There is very little information, however, on whether incorporation of the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) necessary for visualization of SCEs affects the sensitivity of the SCE test system to different chemical agents. We have investigated the effect of BrdU incorporation on SCE induction by labeling cells with BrdU for either the first cell cycle or the first and second cell cycles. The cells were then treated with bleomycin, which produces DNA strand breakage; proflavine, which intercalates into DNA; mitomycin C, which produces monoadducts and DNA crosslinks; or aphidicolin, which inhibits DNA polymerase α. Chemicals were added before BrdU exposure or during the first, second, or both cell cycles. Only mitomycin C, which induces long-lived lesions, elevated the SCE frequency when cells were treated before BrdU labeling. When bleomycin, proflavine, or mitomycin C was present concurrently with BrdU, the frequency of SCEs was increased independently of the BrdU labeling protocol. Aphidicolin, on the other hand, induced more SCEs when present for the second cell cycle, when DNA replicates on a template DNA strand containing BrdU. We also examined the induction of SCEs in the first cell cycle (twins) and in the second cell cycle (singles) after continuous treatment of cells with BrdU and the test chemicals. Only aphidicolin increased SCE frequency in the second cell cycle. These results indicate that aphidicolin, but not bleomycin, proflavine, or mitomycin C, affects BrdU-substituted DNA and unsubstituted DNA differently. This type of interaction should be taken into consideration when the SCE test is used as an assay system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Hur E, Elkind MM (1972) Damage and repair of DNA in 5-bromodeoxyuridine-labeled Chinese hamster cells exposed to fluorescent light. Biophys J 12:636–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver JE (1982) Specificity and completeness of inhibition of DNA repair by novobiocin and aphidicolin. Carcinogenesis 3:1171–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver JE (1983) Structure of repaired sites in human DNA synthesized in the presence of inhibitors of DNA polymerases alpha and beta in human fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 739:301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey WC, Humphrey RM (1965) Increase in radiosensitivity to ionizing radiation related to replacement of thymidine in mammalian cells with 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Radiat Res 26:538–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillehay LE, Thompson LH, Carrano AV (1984) DNA strand breaks associated with halogenated pyrimidine incorporation. Mutat Res, in press

  • Djordjevic B, Szybalski W (1960) Genetics of human cell lines. III. Incorporation of 5-bromo- and 5-iododeoxyuridine into the deoxyribonucleic acid of human cells and its effect on radiation sensitivity. J Exp Med 112:509–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkacz BW, Omidiji O, Gray DA, Shall S (1980) (ADP-ribose)n participates in DNA excision repair. Nature 283:593–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Heddle JA (1969) Influence of false twins on the ratios of twin and single sister chromatid exchanges. J Theor Biol 22:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson F (1973) The lesions produced by ultraviolet light in DNA containing 5-bromouracil. Q Rev Biophys 6:201–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikushima T, Wolff S (1974) Sister chromatid exchanges induced by light flashes to 4-bromodeoxyuridineand 5-iododeoxyuridine-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes. Exp Cell Res 87:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii Y, Bender MA (1978) Factors influencing the frequency of mitomycin C-induced sister-chromatid exchanges in 5-bromodeoxyuridine-substituted human lymphocytes in culture. Mutat Res 51:411–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato H (1977) Mechanisms for sister chromatid exchange and their relation to the production of chromosomal aberrations. Chromosoma 59:179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA (1973) Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:3395–3399

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnainmaa K, Wolff S (1982) Sister chromatid exchange induced by short-lived monoadducts produced by the bifunctional agents mitomycin C and 8-methoxypsoralen. Environ Mutagen 4:239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield LG, Colyer SP, DuFrain RJ (1983) SCE evaluations in human lymphocytes after G0 exposure to mitomycin C. Lack of expression of MMC-induced SCEs in cells that have undergone greater than two in vitro divisions. Mutat Res 107:119–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WF, Cleaver JE (1983) Effect of 3-aminobenzamide on the rate of ligation during repair of alkylated DNA in human fibroblasts. Cancer Res 43:3104–3107

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WF, Crossen PE (1980) X irradiation and sister chromatid exchange in cultured human lymphocytes. Environ Mutagen 2:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WF, Wolff S (1984) Induction of sister chromatid exchange by 3-aminobenzamide is independent of bromodeoxyuridine. Cytogenet Cell Genet, in press

  • Morgan WF, Schwartz JL, Murnane JP, Wolff S (1983) Effect of 3-aminobenzamide on sister chromatid exchange frequency in X-irradiated cells. Radiat Res 93:567–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan AT, Csukas I, van Zeeland AA (1981) Contribution of incorporated 5-bromodeoxyuridine in DNA to the frequencies of sister-chromatid exchanges induced by inhibitors of poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase. Mutat Res 84:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockey CH (1981) Methyl methane-sulphonate (MMS) induced SCEs are reduced by the BrdU used to visualise them. Chromosoma 84:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Evans HJ (1975) Cytological detection of mutagen-carcinogen exposure by sister chromatid exchange. Nature 258:121–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu NC, Amsbaugh SC, DiPaolo JA (1980) Reduced Nmethyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine sister chromatid exchange induction in Chinese hamster V79 cells pre-exposed to 5-bromodeoxyuridine. Chromosoma 76:329–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Speit G, Wolf M, Vogel W (1980) Synergistic action of cysteamine and BrdU-substituted DNA in the induction of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 81:461–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Speit G, Mehnert K, Wolf M, Vogel W (1982) Ultraviolet-induced sister chromatid exchanges in V-79 cells with normal and BrdUrd-substituted DNA and the influence of intercalating substances and cysteine. Radiat Res 90:538–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetka DG, Carrano AV (1977) The interaction of Hoechst 33258 and BrdU substituted DNA in the formation of sister chromatid exchanges. Chromosoma 63:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Takehisa S (1982) Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by chemicals. In: Wolff S (ed) Sister chromatid exchange. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 87–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JH (1958) Sister chromatid exchanges in tritium-labeled chromosomes. Genetics 43:515–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Terasima T, Tolmach LJ (1961) Changes in X-ray sensitivity of HeLa cells during the division cycle. Nature 190:1210–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S (1978) Chromosomal effects of mutagenic carcinogens and the nature of the lesions leading to sister chromatid exchange. In: Evans HJ and Lloyd DC (eds) Mutagen-induced chromosome damage in man. Edinburgh University Press, pp 208–215

  • Wolff S, Fitjman N (1981) X-ray sensitization of chromatids with unifilarly and bifilarly substituted DNA. Mutat Res 80:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S, Perry P (1975) Insights on chromosome structure from sister chromatid exchange ratios and the lack of both isolabelling and heterolabelling as determined by the FPG technique. Exp Cell Res 93:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff S, Bodycote J, Painter RB (1974) Sister chromatid exchanges induced in Chinese hamster cells by UV irradiation of different stages of the cell cycle. The necessity for cells to pass through S. Mutat Res 25:73–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, W.F., Wolff, S. Effect of 5-bromodeoxyuridine substitution on sister chromatid exchange induction by chemicals. Chromosoma 89, 285–289 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292476

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292476

Keywords

Navigation