Skip to main content

Gender differences in friendship patterns

Abstract

The same-sex and opposite-sex friendship patterns of men and women students from two first-year psychology classes at the University of Waikato in New Zealand were examined. A friendship questionnaire previously used in the United States of America was administered to compare results of the two cultures. Findings from this study support American research suggesting that women are more intimate and emotional in their same-sex friendships than men, and tend to place a higher value on these friendships than men do. In accordance with findings of the American sample, New Zealand women emphasized talking, emotional sharing, and discussing personal problems with their same-sex friends, and men showed an emphasis on sharing activities and doing things with their men friends. Differences between the American and New Zealand samples were shown for men in the number of friends and the intimacy levels of these friendships. New Zealand men preferred numerous but less intimate same-sex friends, while women (as in the United States) showed a preference for a few, close, intimate same-sex friends. Men, in contrast to women, derived emotional support and therapeutic value more from their opposite-sex relationships than their same-sex friendships. Finally, more men than women stated they would not cancel an engagement with an opposite-sex friend in order to go out with a same-sex friend. Results are interpreted as suggesting a need for changes in the current socialization process of males who are taught to repress their emotions and form rather less intimate and possibly less beneficial same-sex friendships than women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Aries, E., & Johnson, F. Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 1183–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balswick, J., & Peck, C. The inexpressive male: A tragedy of American society. Family Coordinator, 1971, 20, 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardwick, J. The psychology of women: A study of bicultural conflicts. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In M. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research, 1. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. Fifteen-minute spot-checks of the involvement of children in activities in kindergartens, presented in chart form. In Education and the Equality of the Sexes report, Department of Education, Wellington, 1975.

  • Bell, R. Friendships of women and of men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5(3), 402–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. The female world. New York: The Free Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. The changing American child: A speculative analysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1961, 7, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M., & Peplau, L. Sex differences in same sex friendship. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, P., & Bujra, J. Women united, women divided. Comparative studies of ten contemporary cultures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carkhuff, R. R. The art of helping, 5th ed. Amherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, L., & Lewis, M. Mothers and two-year olds: A study of sex-differentiated aspects of verbal interaction. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 12, 278–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozby, P. Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, S., & Packard, T. The therapeutic value of friendship between women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 495–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, F. Big boys don't cry. Auckland: Cassell, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E., & Adelson, J. The adolescent experience. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, H. The hazards of being male: Surviving the myth of masculine privilege. New York: Signet, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S., & Lewis, M. Play behavior in the year-old infant. Early sex differences. Child Development, 1969, 40, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. Blue-collar marriage. New York: Vintage, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, M., Huesmann, L., & Eron, L. Parental punishment, a longitudinal analysis of effects. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1978, 35, 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A. Emotional intimacy among men. Journal of Social Issues, 1978, 34, 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., & Freedle, R. Mother infant dyad: The cradle of meaning. In P. Pliner, L. Kramer, & T. Alloway (Eds.), Communication and affect: Language and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, G. Behaviour of lovers: measuring the closeness of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1985, 2, 215–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhern, R., & Passman, R. Parental discipline as affected by the sex of the parent, the sex of the child, and the child's apparent responsiveness to discipline. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 604–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. The male sex role: Definitions, problems and sources of change. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, E., & Bultena, G. Sex differences in intimate friendships in old age. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, J., & Amerikaner, M. Self-disclosure. In R. Woody (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of clinical assessment. New York: Jossey, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. Child rearing practices in New Zealand. Wellington: A. H. & A. W. Reed, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J., Growing up in New Zealand. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. Spare the rod. New York: George Allen & Unwin, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. B. Just friends. The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, P., Maccoby, E., & Levin, H. Patterns of child rearing. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiden, A., & Bart, P. Woman to woman: Is sisterhood powerful?, In Glazer-Malbin, N. (Ed.), Old family/new family. New York: Litton Educational Publishing Inc., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L., O'Leary, K., Kent, R., & Tolnick, I. A comparison of teacher response to the preacademic and problem behaviour of boys and girls. Child Development, 1973, 44, 776–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L. Sex role socialization. CA: Mayfield Publishing Co., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 587–600.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aukett, R., Ritchie, J. & Mill, K. Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles 19, 57–66 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292464

Keywords

  • Emotional Support
  • Socialization Process
  • American Sample
  • Personal Problem
  • Share Activity