Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome number variation within Philaethria butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Heliconiini)

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The haploid chromosome number of the South American butterfly Philaethria dido varies from 12 to 88. Eight different numbers have been found in this species complex. The related Ph. pygmalion and Ph. wernickei usually show only n=29, a very frequent number in the Lepidoptera; numbers of n=15 and n=21 for these species need confirmation. The most common chromosome number for Ph. dido is also the highest, n=88, and is found in many parts of northern and central Brazil on the Amazon river and its tributaries, as well as adjacent parts of other countries. The other numbers were observed mainly in northern South America and along the east coast. Two very different numbers were found together in four localities. We did not find specimens with meiotic features suggesting hybridization between individuals with different chromosome numbers. The diverse numbers in Ph. dido may belong to good sibling species, distinguishable externally by very minor characters. Since Ph. dido is a very primitive species in the tribe Heliconiini, dating probably from the early Tertiary, it probably has had many opportunities to undergo divergent chromosome evolution in isolation. Its strong, high flight and broad ecological valence would then permit rapid spreading out and coexistence of different chromosome forms, which in some cases have been noted to show diverse behaviour in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer H (1939) Chromosomenforschung (Karyologia and Cytogenetik). Fortschr Zool 4:584–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer H (1953) Die Chromosomenreduktion (Meiose). In: Hartmann M, Allgemeine Biologie 4. Aufl Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart pp 498–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Jr KS (1979) Ecologia geografica e evolucao nas florestas neotropicais. Thesis Universidade Estadual de Campinas p 265

  • Brown Jr KS (1981) The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Ann Rev Entomol 26:427–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Jr KS, Sheppard PM, Turner JRG (1974) Quaternary refugia in tropical America: evidence from race formation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc R Soc Lond B 187:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown Jr KS, Eliazar PE, Emmel TC, Suomalainen E (in preparation) Evolutionary significance of chromosome numbers in neotropical Lepidoptera. I. Heliconiini

  • Emmel TC, Trew HR, Shields O (1973) Chromosomal variability in a Nearctic lycaenid butterfly (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Pan Pacific Entomol 49:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Emsley MG (1965) Speciation in Heliconius (Lep.: Nymphalidae): Morphology and geographic distribution. Zoologica 50:191–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Federley H (1938) Chromosomenzahlen finnländischer Lepidopteren. I. Rhopalocera. Hereditas 24:397–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Haffer J (1969) Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lesse H (1963) Variation chromosomique chez les Agrodiaetus (Lep. Lycaenidae). Rev Fr Entomol 30:182–189

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lesse H (1966) Variation chromosomique chez Agrodiaetus dolus Hubner (Lep. Lycaenidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr NS: 209–214

  • Lorcović Z (1949) Chromosomenzahlen-Vervielfachung bei Schmetterlingen und ein neuer Fall fünffacher Zahl. Rev Suisse Zool 56:243–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyapunova EA, Vorontsov NN, Korobitsyna KV, Ivanitskaya EYu, Borisov YuM, Yakimenko LV, Dovgal VYe (1980) A Robertsonian fan in Ellobius talpinus. Genetica 52–53:239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Spassky B, Richmond RC, Pérez-Salas S, Pavlovsky O, Mourao CA, Hunter AS, Hoenigsberg H, Dobzhansky T, Ayala FJ (1971) Geography of the sibling species related to Drosophila willistoni, and the semispecies of the Drosophila paulistorum complex. Evolution 25:129–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomalainen E (1953) The kinetochore and the bivalent structure in the Lepidoptera. Hereditas 39:88–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomalainen E (1965) On the chromosomes of the geometrid moth genus Cidaria. Chromosoma 16:166–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomalainen E (1969) Chromosome evolution in the Lepidoptera. Chromosomes Today 2:132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomalainen E, Cook LM, Turner JRG (1972) Chromosome numbers of heliconiine butterflies from Trinidad, West Indies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Zoologica (NY) 56:121–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JRG (1970) Mimicry: a study in behaviour, genetics, ecology and biochemistry. Sci Prog Oxf 58:219–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JRG (1971) Studies of Müllerian mimicry and its evolution in burnet moths and heliconid butterflies. In: Creed R (ed) Ecological genetics and evolution. Blackwell Sci Publications, Oxford, Edinburgh, pp 224–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JRG (1975) A tale of two butterflies. Nat Hist 84:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahrman J, Gourevitz P (1973) Extreme chromosome variability in a colonising rodent. Chromosomes Today 4:399–424

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution. 3rd ed. Cambridge Univ Press, London, New York, Melbourne p 961

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier BS (1971) Pleistocene changes in the fauna and flora of South America. Science 173:771–780

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Professor Hans Bauer on the occasion of his eightieth birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suomalainen, E., Brown, K.S. Chromosome number variation within Philaethria butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Heliconiini). Chromosoma 90, 170–176 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292393

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292393

Keywords

Navigation