Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Maintaining social identity in a mixed-gender setting: Minority/majority status and cooperative/competitive feedback

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tested the applicability of Tajfel and Turner's (1986) Social Identity Theory (SIT) to cooperative behavior in a mixed-gender setting. SIT suggests that as a “socially subordinate” group in a male-dominated society, women, when their gender is in the numerical minority, will engage in social competition in an attempt to enhance social identity. However, gender-based socialization may encourage men toward competition and women toward cooperation, regardless of group gender composition. In this study, male and female subjects were assigned to a six-person mixed-gender group in which their gender was either in the numerical minority or majority, and performed an interactive task under either cooperative or competitive feedback. An interaction of sex and feedback showed males in the cooperative feedback condition responded more competitively than did males in the competitive feedback condition, while females were equally cooperative in both feedback conditions. Feedback also interacted with the numerical ingroup/outgroup gender balance. While competitive feedback elicited little variation in subjects' responses across the ingroup/outgroup balance variable, the cooperative condition elicited greater competition from subjects in the numerical minority and greater cooperation from those in the numerical majority. Results were interpreted as partial support for SIT, while stressing the need for further investigation into gender as a unique influence on intergroup behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, W. M., & Miles, C. (1978). Interpersonal competition and cooperation as a function of sex of subject and sex of counterpart. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 303–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1979). Another look at sex differentiation in the socialization behavior of mothers and fathers. In J. Sherman & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), Psychology of women: Future directions of research. New York: Psychological Dimensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, J., & Vinacke, W. E. (1961). Coalition in mixed-sex triads. Sociometry, 24, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branthwaite, A., & Jones, J. (1975). Fairness and discrimination: English versus Welsh. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, J. A., & Garza, R. T. (1985). Social group salience and interethnic cooperation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 380–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J. E. (1982). Majority-minority relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, R. T., & Herringer, L. G. (1987). Social identity: A multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 127(3), 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, R. T., & Santos, S. J. (in press). Ingroup-outgroup balance and interdependent, interethnic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

  • Gerard, H. B., & Hoyt, M. F. (1974). Distinctiveness of social categorization and attitude toward intergroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 836–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C. G., & Moskowitz, J. M. (1976). Children's preferences for individualistic, cooperative, and competitive outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 543–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., & Winton, W. (1979). Effects of house-hold sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1980). Men's power with women other men, and society: A men's movement analysis. In E. Pleck & J. Pleck (Eds.), The American man. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers' Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York/London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billing, M., Bundy, R., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social idnetity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1975). Social identity and social comparison: Some prospects for intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the socal group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Socialidentity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Brown, R., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1984). Gender and intergroup behavior: Towards an intergration. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Giles, H. (1978). Changing status of women: Intergroup perspectives. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jill E. Borchert

    Present address: Women's Studies Program, University of South Florida, 33620, Tampa, FL

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California, 92521, Riverside, CA

    Raymond T. Garza & Jill E. Borchert

Authors
  1. Raymond T. Garza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jill E. Borchert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by an intramural faculty grant from the University of California, Riverside.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garza, R.T., Borchert, J.E. Maintaining social identity in a mixed-gender setting: Minority/majority status and cooperative/competitive feedback. Sex Roles 22, 679–691 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292054

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292054

Keywords

Search

Navigation