Skip to main content
Log in

Differential components of urban in-and outmobility

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study tested three hypotheses concerning the differential association of social and economic factors with locational in- and outmobility. The results suggest that inmobility is predominantly affected by the economic milieu of towns, while outmobility is predominantly influenced by extant social conditions. A multivariate examination of locational outmobility identified high divorce rate, distance from a major city and large family size as significantly explaining 45.8% of the outmobility variance. Similar analysis of locational inmobility identified the unemployment rate and the ethnic composition as the variables signiciantly explaining 73.9% of the inmobility variance. The results, which were congruent to the first two hypotheses submitted, were discussed and interpreted. The hypothesis concerning the relationship between in- and outmobility was not confirmed. Within successful locations no significant, positive correlation between in- and outmobility rates was obtained, while among unsuccessful locations positive, significant correlations were obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Central Bureau of Statistics: 1984, Statistical Abstract of Israel, vol. 35, Jerusalem.

  • Clark, W. A. V.: 1986, ‘Human migration’, Vol. 7, in G. I. Thrall (ed.), Scientific Geography Series (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comay, Y. and A. Kirschenbaum: 1973, ‘The Israeli new town: An experiment in population redistribution’, Economic Development and Cultural Change 22, pp. 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaglstein, A. S. and J. Weisberg: 1989, ‘Categorical multivariate analysis of urban emigration’, Monograph Series #47 (Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, Jerusalem).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaglstein, A. S. and J. Weisberg: 1990, ‘Categorical, multivariate analysis of intra-urban migration’, Urban Studies 27, pp. 509–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleave, D. and M. Cordey-Hayes: 1977, ‘Migration dynamics and labor market turnover’, Vol. 8, Part 1, in D. Diamond and J. P. McLoughlin (eds.), Progress in Planning (Pergammon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, J. B. and Miller: 1967, The Geographical Mobility of Labor (Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Culture: 1985, Schools in Local Authorities, School Year 1983/4, Jerusalem.

  • Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs: 1985, Minors in the Care of the Juvenile Parole Service, Jerusalem.

  • Rossi, P. H.: 1955, Why Families Move (The Free Press, Glencoe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, J. and A. S. Eaglstein: 1988, ‘An analytical paradigm for the analysis of national inmigration patterns’, International Migration 26, pp. 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weisberg, J., Eaglstein, A.S. Differential components of urban in-and outmobility. Soc Indic Res 38, 217–228 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292046

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292046

Keywords

Navigation