Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of water injection arrangement on the performance of a high-energy scrubber

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of four water injection arrangements on the performance of a high energy scrubber (with throat dimensions of 3.5 cm × 3.5 cm rectangular and 10 cm long) was studied. For each method of water injection, the gas cleaning performance as a function of pressure drop was measured. The data were classified into three classes of particles: large, medium and small corresponding to sizes of 1.0 to 3.0 μm, 0.6 to 1.5 µn and less than 0.6 µn diameter, respectively. The results indicate that for the same operating conditions, the water injection arrangement has a significant effect on the particle collection efficiency for all classes of particles considered The major effect of the water injection arrangement on particle collection efficiency was observed at low pressure drop operations where higher resistance exists for long range transfer mechanism. A maximum difference of about 30% in particle collection efficiency was found at a pressure drop of 25 cm of water head.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taheri, M. and Haines, G. F.: 1969, J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 19, 427.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, W. P.: 1949, Ind. Eng. Chem. 41, 2424.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ekman, F. O. and Johnston, H. F.: 1951, Ind. Eng. Chem. 43, 1358.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eberhardt, J. E. and Graham, H. S.: 1954, ‘The venturi scrubber for blast furnace gas cleaning’, presented at the annual meeting of the AISE; Cleveland, Ohio, September, 1954.

  5. Johnston, H. F., Field, R. B., and Tassler, M. C.: 1954, Ind. Eng. Chem. 46, 1601.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lapple, C. E. and Kamack, H. J.: 1955, Chem. Eng. Progr. 51, 110.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ranz, W.: Eng. Res. Bull. B66, University Park, Pa., 1956.

  8. Brink, J. A. and Content, C. E.: 1958, Ind. Eng. Chem. 50, 1157.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldsmidt, Y. and Calvert, S.: 1963, AIChE J. 9, 352.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calvert, S.: 1968, ‘Source control by liquid scrubbing’, in A. C. Stern (ed.), Air Pollution, 2nd Edn., Academic Press, New York, p. 457.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taheri, M. and Calve, S.: 1968, J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 18, 240.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walker, A. B. and Hall, R. M.: 1968, J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 18, 319.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haines, G. F. and Conahan, H. A.: ’Comparative evaluation of high energy scrubber on oxygen open hearth’, unpublished.

  14. Taheri, M., Beg, S. A. and Beizaie, M.: 1972, J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 22, 794.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taheri, M., Beg, S. A., and Beizaie, M.: 1973, J. Air Pollut. Control Ass. 23, 963.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taheri, M. and Beg, S. A.: 1973, ‘Blast furnace gas cleaning’, Metal and Materials, p. 349.

  17. Beg, S. A. and Taheri, M.: 1974, Atmos. Environ. 8, 947.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beg, S. A. and Taheri, M.: 1977, Atmos. Environ. 11, 911.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taheri, M. and Sheih, C. M.: 1975, AIChE J. 21, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nukiyama, S. and Tanasawa, Y.: 1938, Tran. Soc. Mech. Energy Japan 4, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Beizaie, M.: 1979, personal communication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beg, S.A. Effect of water injection arrangement on the performance of a high-energy scrubber. Water Air Soil Pollut 14, 299–307 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291843

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291843

Keywords

Navigation