Abstract
General measures of self-esteem have often been unsuccessful in predicting specific behaviors or self-reports, particularly those of female subjects. To explore this problem, this study examined the relationship between a general measure of self-esteem and specific measures of agentic and communal self-esteem in a sample of 79 female and 97 male undergraduates. Three agentic measures were found to account for a greater proportion of the variance in general self-esteem scores of males (51%) than of females (33%). This difference was accentuated when traditionally sex-typed subjects were compared separately; the percentages for these groups were 45% for masculine males and 14% for feminine females. Differences between male and female subjects regarding the communal measure were small and nonsignificant. Implications for sex typing and the measurement of self-esteem are considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakan, D. The duality of human experience. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
Brissett, D. Toward a clarification of self-esteem. Psychiatry, 1972, 35, 255–262.
Deaux, K. The behavior of women and men. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1976.
Franks, D. D., & Marolla, J. Efficacious action and social approval as interacting dimensions of self-esteem: A tentative formulation through construct validation. Sociometry, 1976, 39, 324–341.
Guertin, W. H., & Jourard, S. M. Characteristics of real-self — ideal-self discrepancy scores revealed by factor analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1962, 26, 241–245.
Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Short forms of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI), an objective measure of self-esteem. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974, 4, 473–475.
Helmreich, R., Stapp, J., & Ervin, C. The Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI): An objective measure of self-esteem or social competence. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1974, 4, 79. (Ms. No. 681)
Hovland, C. J., & Janis, J. L. Personality and persuasibility. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.
Simpson, C. K., & Boyle, D. Esteem construct generality and academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975, 35, 897–904.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attitudes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
Stake, J. E. Performance-self-esteem and achievement-related behaviors of male and female college students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Denver, 1978.
Stake, J. E. The ability/performance dimension of self-esteem: Implications for women's achievement behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1979, 3, 365–377.
Stake, J. E., & Stake, M. N. Performance-self-esteem and dominance behavior in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality, 1979, 47, 71–84.
Warren, N. T. Self-esteem and cognitive bias in the evaluation of past performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, 1975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stake, J.E., Orlofsky, J.L. On the use of global and specific measures in assessing the self-esteem of males and females. Sex Roles 7, 653–662 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291753
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291753