Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of two measuring methods for the evaluation of C-heterochromatin in human chromosomes

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this study two different methods for evaluating the size of the C heterochromatin blocks of human chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y were compared. The first method measured the lengths of both the euchromatin and the C heterochromatin parts of the p and q arms of chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y. The second method analyzed the same chromosome segments, but by measuring the areas.

In the comparison, the relative C heterochromatin value (length or surface) of each chromosome, the mean for each individual, the standard deviation, and the coefficient of variation were taken into account. It is proposed that the best estimation for the size of a C heterochromatin segment is the ratio of its length to the total length of the chromosome; accurate estimation requires at least 20 metaphases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buckton KE, O'Riordan ML, Jacobs PA, Robinson JA, Hill R, Evans HJ (1976) C- and Q-band polymorphisms in the chromosomes of three human populations. Ann Hum Genet 40:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig-Holmes AP, Moore FB, Shaw MW (1973) Polymorphism of human C-band heterochromatin. I. Frequency of variants. Am J Hum Genet 25:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie WH, Lubs HA (1975) Human Q and C chromosomal variations: distribution and incidence. Cytogenet Cell Genet 14: 97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead PS, Nowell PC, Mellman DH, Hungerford DA (1960) Chromosome preparations of leucocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp Cell Res 20:613–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller HJ, Klinger HP, Glasser M (1975) Chromosome polymorphism in a human new-born population. II. Potentials of polymorphic chromosome variants for characterizing the idiogram of an individual. Cytogenet Cell Genet 15:239–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Podugolnikova OA, Perfenova IV, Sushanlo HM, Prokofieva-Belgorskaja AA (1979) The quantitative analysis of polymorphism on human chromosomes 1, 9, 16 and Y. I. Description of individual karyotypes. Hum Genet 49:243–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatine. Exp Cell Res 75:304–306

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Anthropogenetics, Free University of Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium

    C. Staessen, M. Kirsch-Volders & C. Susanne

Authors
  1. C. Staessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Kirsch-Volders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Susanne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staessen, C., Kirsch-Volders, M. & Susanne, C. Comparison of two measuring methods for the evaluation of C-heterochromatin in human chromosomes. Hum Genet 61, 68–70 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291337

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00291337

Keywords

Search

Navigation