Abstract
Subjects read different versions of a rape case in which the victim was walking alone at night and the defendant was obviously guilty. Female subjects saw the crime as more debilitating for the victim and were more punitive than male subjects. Female subjects considered the victim less responsible when the defendant was unattractive than when the defendant was attractive. Presence or absence of prior casual acquaintance between the victim and assailant interacted with other factors. With prior acquaintance, male subjects considered the victim more responsible than female subjects, unattractive victims were considered more responsible than attractive victims, and unattractive defendants were considered more likely to engage in future antisocial behavior than attractive defendants. Although biased by other factors, level of victim blame was low overall. Yet subjects seemed reluctant to believe the rapist and his victim were unacquainted and seemed to consider the rape as sexually, rather than aggressively, motivated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Calhoun, L., Selby, J., & Warring, L. Social perception of the victim's causal role in rape: An exploratory examination of four factors. Human Relations, 1976, 29, 517–526.
Calhoun, L., Selby, J., Cann, A., & Keller, T. The effects of victim physical attractiveness and sex of respondent on social reactions to victims of rape. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 18, 346–365.
Deitz, S. R., & Byrnes, L. E. Attribution of responsibility for sexual assault: The influence of observer empathy and defendant occupation and attractiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 1981, 108, 17–29.
Deitz, S. R., Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 1984, 10, 261–280.
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.
Jacobson, M. B. Effects of victim's and defendant's physical attractiveness on subjects' judgments in a rape case. Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 247–255.
Jacobson, M. B., & Popovich, P. M. Victim attractiveness and perceptions of responsibility in an ambiguous rape case. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1983, 8, 100–104.
L'Armand, K., & Pepitone, A. Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 134–139.
Seligman, C., Brickman, J., & Koulack, D. Rape and physical attractiveness: Assigning responsibility to victims. Journal of Personality, 1977, 45, 555–563.
Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 410–414.
Smith, R., Keating, J., Hester, R., & Mitchell, H. Considerations in the attribution of responsibility to a rape victim. Journal of Research in Personality, 1976, 10, 346–357.
Tetreault, P. A., & Barnett, M. A. Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1987, 11, 353–358.
Thornton, B. Effect of rape victim's attractiveness in a jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977, 3, 666–669.
Thornton, B., & Ryckman, R. M. The influence of a rape victim's physical attractiveness on observers' attributions of responsibility, Human Relations, 1983, 36, 549–562.
Villemur, N. K., & Hyde, J. S. Effects of sex of defense attorney, sex of juror, and age and attractiveness of the victim on mock juror decision making in a rape case. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 879–888.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerdes, E.P., Dammann, E.J. & Heilig, K.E. Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles 19, 141–153 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290151
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290151