Abstract
This paper reports on changes in the beliefs and observance of menstrual taboos among Havik Brahmins in South India. Menstrual taboos have decreased in importance over the past 20 years as a woman's primary role has been redefined as a marital partner rather than as a bearer of children. When her function was as a bearer of children for the patrilineage, she was considered subject to biological rhythms and a threat to male ritual status. With increased education, professional opportunities, and increased marriage age for women, ritual status and male dominance have become less significant. Women are ritually less dangerous, less dependent on men, and transcend the biological rhythms that menstrual taboos symbolize.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Harper, E. B. (1964). Ritual pollution as an integrator of caste and religion. The Journal of Asian Studies, 23, 151–197.
Harper, E. B. (1969). Fear and the status of women. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 25, 81–95.
Ortner, S. B. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In M. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Women, Culture, and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Schlegel, A., & Barry, H. III. (1986). The cultural consequence of female contribution to subsistence. American Anthropologist, 88, 142–150.
Ullrich, H. E. (1975). Etiquette among women in Karnataka: Forms of address in the village and the family. Social Action, 25, 325–348.
Ullrich, H. E. (1977). Caste differences between Brahmin and non-Brahmin women in a South Indian village. In A. Schlegel (Ed.), Sexual stratification: A cross-cultural view. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ullrich, H. E. (1987). Marriage patterns among Havik Brahmins: A 20-year study of change. Sex Roles, 16, 615–635.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research on which this paper is based was carried out with the support of grants from the American Institute of Indian Studies (1964–1966, 1974–1975, 1987) and the American Philosophical Society (1985). I gratefully acknowledge the constructive criticism from Joan Bamberger, Kaja Finkler, Shirley Lindenbaum, and the anonymous readers who commented upon earlier drafts of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ullrich, H.E. Menstrual taboos among havik brahmin women: A study of ritual change. Sex Roles 26, 19–40 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290123
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290123