Abstract
In recent years pornography has become a controversial political/moral issue sparking intense debate among a variety of groups. The purpose of the research carried out in 1988 and reported here was to examine attitudes about and exposure to sexually explicit materials for a representative sample of predominantly Caucasian students at a state university in the Midwest. Results indicated that a majority defined pornography as media portraying explicit sexual activities, agreed that adults should have access to sexually explicit materials, and attributed both harmful and positive effects to such materials. Respondents tended to endorse either the views that sexually explicit materials are harmful, do not have positive effects, and should be restricted, or the opposite views that they are not harmful, do have positive effects, and should not be restricted. Women, more religious respondents, less sexually active respondents, and those who had never seen such materials endorsed the more negative evaluations. These students' views are compared with those of a representative sample of the county as a whole, as well as with residents of other locales in the United States. Results are also discussed with respect to four conceptually distinct positions on the pornography issue.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Baron, L. (1990). Pornography and gender equality: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 27, 363–380.
Blumberg, R. L. (1984). A general theory of gender stratification. Sociological Theory, 2, 23–101.
Brownmiller, S. (1980). Let's put pornography back in the closet. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.
Burstyn, V. (1985). Women against censorship. Vancouver, BC: Douglas & McIntyre.
Chesler, P. (1980). Men and pornography: Why they use it. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.
Collins, R. (1971). A conflict theory of sexual stratification. Social Problems, 19, 3–21.
Cottle, C. E., Searles, P., Berger, R. J., & Pierce, B. A. (1989). Conflicting ideologies and the politics of pornography. Gender and Society, 3, 303–333.
Craig, M. E. (1990). Coercive sexuality in dating relationships: A situation model. Clinical Psychological Review, 10, 395–423.
Davis, M. S. (1983). Smut, erotic reality/obscene ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Diamond, M., & Dannemiller, J. E. (1989). Pornography and community standards in Hawaii: Comparisons with other states. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 475–495.
Donnerstein, E. (1986). The pornography commission report: Do findings fit conclusions? Sexual Coercion and Assault: Issues and Perspectives, 1, 185–188.
Donnerstein, E., & Linz, D. G. (1988). The question of pornography. In O. Pocs (Ed.), Human sexuality. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group.
Dworkin, A. (1980). For men, freedom of speech; for women, silence please. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.
Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. London: The Women's Press.
Ellis, K., O'Dair, B., & Tallmer, A. (1990). Feminism and pornography. Feminist Review, 36, 15–18.
Feldman-Summers, S. (1986). A comment on the Meese Commission Report and the dangers of censorship. Sexual Coercion & Assault: Issues and Perspectives, 1, 179–184.
Fisher, W. A. (1983). Gender, gender-role identification, and response to erotica. In E. R. Allgeier & N. B. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 123–151.
Friedan, B. (1985, November 3). How to get the women's movement moving again. New York Times Magazine, p. 98.
Garcia, L. T., & Milano, L. (1991). A content analysis of erotic videos. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 3, 95–103.
Griffitt, W. (1987). Females, males, and sexual responses. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males and sexuality. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kaminer, W. (1980). Pornography and the First Amendment: Prior restraints and private action. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.
Kelley, J. (1978). Sexual permissiveness: Evidence for a theory. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 455–470.
Klein, M. (1990). Censorship and the fear of sexuality. In O. Pocs (Eds.), Human sexuality 91/92. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group.
Lederer, L. (1980). Introduction. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.
Leong, W. (1991). The pornography ‘problem’: Disciplining women and young girls. Media, Culture, and Society, 13, 91–117.
Linz, D., Donnerstein, E., & Penrod, S. (1987). The findings and recommendations of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography: Do the psychological “facts” fit the political fury? American Psychologist, 42, 946–953.
Lottes, I. (1985). The use of cluster analysis to determine belief patterns of sexual attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, 21, 405–421.
Malamuth, N. M. (1984). Aggression against women: Cultural and individual causes. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression. New York: Academic Press.
Malamuth, N. M. (1989). Distinguishing between the Surgeon General's personal views and the consensus reached at his workshop on pornography. American Psychologist, 44, 580.
MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morgan, R. (1980). Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: William Morrow.
Mosher, D. L. (1986). The Meese Commission: “I told you so.” Sexual Coercion and Assault: Issues and Perspectives, 1, 151–159.
Mosher, D. L. (1989). The threat to sexual freedom: Moralistic intolerance instills a spiral of silence. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 492–509.
Padgett, V. R., Brislin-Slutz, J. A., & Neal, J. A. (1989). Pornography, erotica, and attitudes toward women: The effects of repeated exposure. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 479–491.
Paletz, D. L. (1988). Pornography, politics, and the press: The U.S. attorney general's commission on pornography. Journal of Communication, 38, 122–136.
Palys, T. A. (1986). Testing the common wisdom: The social content of video pornography. Canadian Psychology, 27, 22–35.
Reiss, I. L. (1986). Journey into sexuality: An exploratory voyage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reiss, I. L. (1990). An end to shame: Shaping our next sexual revolution. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Reiss, I. R., Anderson, R. E., & Sponaugle, G. C. (1980). A multivariate model of the determinants of extramarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 395–411.
Rimmer, R. H. (1984). The X-rated videotape guide. New York: Arlington House.
Rodgerson, G., & Semple L. (1990). Who watches the watchwomen: Feminists against censorship. Feminist Review, 36, 19–24.
Scott, J. E., & Cuvelier, S. J. (1987). Sexual violence in Playboy magazine: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 23, 534–539.
Segal, L. (1990). Pornography and violence: What the ‘experts’ really say. Feminist Review, 36, 29–41.
Stanley, L. (1990). Sex and the law, Newsletter of the committee on Scientific and Professional Affairs of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex.
Weinberg, M. (1986). Unpublished report. University of Indiana, Department of Sociology.
Willis, E. (1983). Feminism, moralism, and pornography. In C. Stansell & S. Thompson (Eds.), Powers of desire: The politics of sexuality. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Wilson, W. C., & Abelson, H. I. (1973). Experience with and attitudes toward explicit sexual materials. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 19–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We wish to thank Leslie Morgan and Brian Powell for their helpful comments on a draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lottes, I., Weinberg, M. & Weller, I. Reactions to pornography on a college campus: For or against?. Sex Roles 29, 69–89 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289997
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289997
Keywords
- United States
- Social Psychology
- Representative Sample
- Sexual Activity
- Negative Evaluation