Abstract
This study examines (1) the conditions giving rise to variation in sex-role orientation and the perceived cost of having children, and (2) the role these variables play as mechanisms linking antecedent variables to perceptions of ideal fertility. Data are drawn from a metropolitan area sampling of 401 adults. Antecedent variables of sex, employment status, age, education, exposure to metropolitan living, and religious traditionalism — though correlated with ideal fertility — have no direct effects on that variable. Rather, the effects of these variables on fertility are mediated through sex-role orientation and the perceived cost of having children.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, G. An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and economic changes in developed countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960. Pp. 209–240.
Beckman, L. The relative rewards and costs of parenthood and employment for employed women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1978, 2, 215–234.
Blake, J. Reproductive ideals and educational attainment among white Americans. Population Studies, 1967, 21, 159–174.
Blake, J. Are babies consumer durables? Critique of the economic theory of reproductive motivation. Population Studies, 1968, 22, 5–25.
Blake, J. Coercive pronatalism and American population policy. Berkeley: International Population and Urban Research, 1972.
Bumpass, L. Is low fertility here to stay? Family Planning Perspectives, 1973, 5, 67–79.
Campbell, A., & Converse, P. The American way of mating: Marriage si, children only maybe. Psychology Today, 1975, 8, 37–43.
Freedman, R., Whelpton, P., & Campbell, A. Family planning, sterility, and population growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Glick, P. A demographer looks at American families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37, 15–26.
Hoffman, L., & Hyatt, F. Social change and motivations for having larger families. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1960, 6, 235–244.
Homans, G. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, 1974.
Holter, H. Sex roles and social structure. Oslo: Universitet-forlaget, 1970.
Kagan, J., & Moss, M. Birth to maturity. New York: Wiley, 1962.
Kirk, R. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1968.
Leibenstein, H. Economic backwardness and economic growth. New York: Wiley, 1957.
Lowenthal, N., & David, A. Social and economic correlates of family fertility. Raleigh, N.C.: Research Triangle Institute, 1972.
Mason, K., Cazjka, J., & Arber, S. Change in U.S. women's sex role attitudes, 1964–1976. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 537–596.
Miller, W., & Levitan, T. Leadership and change. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop, 1976.
Morgan, C. Predicting support for sex role change. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980.
Piepmeier, K., & Adkins, T. The status of women and fertility. Journal of Biosocial Science, 1973, 5, 507–520.
Roper Poll. The Virginia Slims American women's attitude poll: A survey of attitudes of women on marriage, divorce, the family and America's changing sexual morality. New York: Roper Organization, 1974.
Ryder, N. The future of American fertility. Social Problems, 1979, 26, 359–270.
Ryder, N., & Westoff, C. Reproduction in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.
Scanzoni, J. Sex roles, life styles and childbearing. New York: Free Press, 1975.
Scanzoni, J. Gender roles and the process of fertility control. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 677–691.
Smith-Lovin, L., & Tickamyer, A. Nonrecursive models of labor force participation, fertility behavior, and sex role attitudes. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 541–557.
Stark, R., & Glock, C. American piety: The nature of religious commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of the population. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970.
Waite, L., & Stolzenberg, R. Intended childbearing and labor force participation of young women: Insights from nonrecursive models. American Sociological Review, 1977, 41, 235–251.
Whelpton, P., Campbell, A., & Patterson, J. Fertility and family planning in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank the College of Arts and Sciences, The University of Oklahoma, for providing funds for this project. The data in this report were collected as part of a larger survey of the graduate training program in methods and statistics in the Department of Sociology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, W.J., Morgan, C.S. An analysis of factors affecting traditional family expectations and perceptions of ideal fertility. Sex Roles 9, 901–914 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289964
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289964