Abstract
Meta-analytic reviews indicate that the gender of a target person has a significant but small impact on evaluators' judgments about this person. The present study examines the extent to which this small effect reflects evaluators' tendencies not to use an evaluatee's gender because they assume that case information about a target is more informative about his or her abilities, knowledge, and traits than is gender. The first study indicates that decreasing the diagnosticity of case information does not increase the tendency for people to be influenced by the target's gender. However, the first and second study illustrate that despite the weak influence of the target's gender, subjects are still using gender stereotypes when making social judgments about the evaluatee. This is evidenced by the impact of the stereotypicality of the case information. This is most clearly seen in Study 2, which illustrates how components of gender stereotypes are influencing judgments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychological, 44, 211–233.
Biernat, M. (1991). Gender stereotypes and the relationship between masculinity and femininity: A developmental analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 351–366.
Biernat, M. (1992). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Paper presented at annual meeting of Society for Experimental Social Psychology Meeting in San Antonio, TX.
Brewer, M. B., Dull, V., & Lui, L. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 656–670.
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1983). Assessment of gender stereotypes: Methodology and components. Psychological Documents, 13, 25. (Ms. No. 2583.)
Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145–167.
Eagly, A., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fischhoff, B., & Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). Diagnosticity and the base-rate effect. Memory and Cognition, 12, 402–410.
Futoran, G. C., & Wyer, R. S. (1986). The effects of traits and gender stereotypes on occupational suitability judgments and the recall of judgment-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 475–503.
Hinz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., Nagao, D. H., Davis, J. H., & Robertson, B. A. (1988). The influence of the accuracy of individuating information on the use of base rate information in probability judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 127–145.
Ginossar, S., & Trope, Y. (1980). The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another person. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 228–242.
Ginosar, Z., & Trope, Y. (1987). Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 464–474.
Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821–831.
Locksley, A., Hepburn, C., & Ortiz, V. (1982). Social stereotypes and judgments of individual: An instance of the base-rate fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 23–42.
Martin, C. L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489–499.
McCauley, C., & Stitt, C. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929–940.
McCauley, C., Stitt, C. L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195–208.
Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267–147.
Park, B., Ryan, C. S., & Judd, C. M. (1992). Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553–567.
Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051–1068.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.
Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. (1989). Joan Mccoy vs. John Mccoy: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409–429.
Wallston, B., & O'Leary, V. (1981). Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 35–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Portions of this research were supported by a University of Minnesota Dissertation Grant. Thanks go to Gail Swenson, Rose Enriques, and Wayne Bylsma for their assistance in the data collection, to my committee members Eugene Borgida (Chairperson), Marti Gonzales, Mark Snyder, Geoffrey Maruyama, Barbara Loken for their suggestions on the first study, and to Cindy Thomsen and Eugene Borgida for their support, encouragement, and consultations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swim, J. In search of gender bias in evaluations and trait inferences: The role of diagnosticity and gender stereotypicality of behavioral information. Sex Roles 29, 213–237 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289937
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289937