The present study examined the effect of facial attractiveness and gender on raters' evaluations of and explanations for managerial performance. Results showed attractiveness to be a potential liability for both males and females. Good performance of attractive females was more likely than that of others to be attributed to luck or bias, while that of attractive males was viewed as occurring with little effort. In addition, the poor performance of attractive individuals was blamed on lack of effort (females) or lack of ability (males). Implications of these findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Alicke, M. D., Smith, R. H., & Klotz, M. L. Judgments of physical attractiveness: The role of faces and bodies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1986, 12, 381–389.
Bernstein, V., Hakel, M.D., & Harlan, A. The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 556–560.
Berscheid, E., Dion, K. K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. Physical attractiveness and dating choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 173–189.
Burger, J. M., Cooper, H. M., & Good, T. L. Teacher attributions of student performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 685–690.
Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. Designing research for applications. Journal of Consumer Research, 1981, 8, 197–207.
Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S., Sexism and “beautyism” in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 301–310.
Clifford, M. M., & Walster, G. W. The effects of physical attractiveness on teacher expectation. Sociology of Education, 1973, 46, 248–258.
Cook, T. C., & Campbell, D. T. Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rank McNally, 1979.
Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 1, 80–85.
Dickey-Bryant, L., Lautenschlager, G. J., Mendoza, J. L., & Abrahams, N. Facial attractiveness and its relation to occupational success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71, 16–19.
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.
Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D., & Terpstra, D. E. Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 288–294.
Etaugh, C., & Brown, B. Perceiving the causes of success and failure of male and female performers. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 103.
Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions, and perceived likelihood of different consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 20–31.
Feldman-Summers, S., & Kiesler, S. B. Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on the attribution of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 846–855.
Freeman, H. R. Structure and content of gender stereotypes: Effects of somatic appearance and trait information. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1987, 11, 59–68.
Gilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. G. Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1986, 59, 103–109.
Green, S. G., & Lidden, R. C. Contextual and attributional influences upon control decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 453–458.
Greenburg, J. The college sophomore and guinea pig: Setting the record straight. Academy of Management Review 1987, 12, 157–159.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. Multivariate data analysis. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1987.
Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearances and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23, 360–372.
Heilman, M. E., & Stopec, M. H. Being attractive advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985, 35, 202–215.
Jackson, L. A. The influence of sex, physical attractiveness, sex role, and occupational sex-linkage on perceptions of occupational stability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 13, 31–44.
Jones, W. H., Hansson, R. O., & Phillips, A. L. Physical attractiveness and judgments of psychopathology. Journal of Social Psychology, 1978, 29, 299–304.
Kaplan, R. M. Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 195–204.
Kelley, H. H. The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 1972, 28, 107–128.
Landy, D., & Sigall, H. Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 299–304.
Latham, G. P., & Wexley, K. N. Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1981.
Locke, E. A. Generalizing from laboratory to field: Ecological validity or abstraction of essential elements. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington, Books, 1986.
McHugh, M. C., Frieze, I. H., & Hanusa, B. H. Attributions and sex differences in achievement: Problems and new perspectives. Sex Roles, 1982, 8(4), 467–479.
Mitchell, T. R., & Wood, R. E. Supervisors' responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980, 25, 123–138.
Moore, D. P., & Rust, P. F. Attributional changes in occupational perceptions, 1974–1982. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1984, 363–367.
Moore, J. S., Graziano, W. G., & Millar, M. G. Physical attractiveness, sex role orientation, and the evaluation of adults and children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987, 13, 95–102.
Schmidt, N. Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 1976, 29, 79–101.
Schoeneman, T. J., & Rubanowitz, D. E. Attributions in the advice columns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1985, 11, 315–325.
Taynor, J., & Deaux, K. Equity and perceived sex differences: Role behavior as defined by the task, the mode, and the actions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 381–390.
Travis, C. B. Sex comparisons in causal attributions: Another look at the null hypothesis. Sex Roles, 1982 8(4), 375–380.
Unger, R. K., Hilderbrand, M., & Madar, T. Physical attractiveness and assumptions about social deviance: Some sex by sex comparisons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 8, 293–310.
Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. Kelly, R. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972.
Wong, P. T. P. Sex differences in performance attribution and contingency judgment. Sex Roles, 1982, 8(4), 381–388.
Wood, R. E., & Mitchell, T. R. Manager behavior in a social context: The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 1981, 26, 356–378.
An earlier version of this paper was published in the 1986 Proceedings of the Southern Management Association.
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer, B.A., Stephen Taylor, G. Effects of facial attractiveness and gender on causal attributions of managerial performance. Sex Roles 19, 273–285 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289838
- Social Psychology
- Poor Performance
- Managerial Performance
- Causal Attribution
- Facial Attractiveness