Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 21, Issue 11–12, pp 725–747 | Cite as

Sex differences in reactions to evaluative feedback

  • Tomi-Ann Roberts
  • Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
Article

Abstract

Two studies tested the influence of various types of verbal evaluative feedback men's and women's self-evaluations of their performance in achievenment situations. We tested a theory that women perceive evaluative feedback, particularly negative feedback, to be more informative about their abilities than do men. Because of this, women's self-assessments of their abilities are more straightforwardly influenced by evaluative feedback than are men's. In contrast, men take a more self-promotional approach to evaluative situations, and therefore are more selective in their responses to feedback. Results from our questionnaire study showed that women's self-evaluations were influenced by both positive and negative evaluative statements. Men allowed positive feedback to influence them more than negative feedback, and were less influenced overall by negative feedback than women. Furthermore, women reported that evaluative feedback, particularly negative feedback, contained more information relevant to their abilities than men. Our laboratory study showed that women's actual self-evaluations were impacted differently by positive and negative feedback, whereas men's were not. In addition, we found some evidence to indicate that women were more negatively influenced by feedback that was positively toned, yet irrelevant with respect to their performance, than men. This finding underscores the fact that the focus, and not just the valence, of evaluative feedback plays an important role in men's and women's responses to it.

Keywords

Social Psychology Laboratory Study Positive Feedback Negative Feedback Questionnaire Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson, E. The social animal. San Francisco: Freeman, 1972.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. Vicarious and self-reinforcement processes. In R. Glaser (Ed.), The nature of reinforcement. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Berk, L. E., & Lewis, N. G. Sex role and social behavior in four school environments. Elementary School Journal, 1977, 77, 205–217.Google Scholar
  4. Blumenfeld, P., Hamilton, V., & Bossert, S. Teacher talk and student thought: Socialization into the student role. Paper presented at the Learning Research and Development Center Conference on Student Motivation, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970, 61, 365–374.Google Scholar
  6. Carlson, R. Understanding women: Implications for personality theory and research. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 17–32.Google Scholar
  7. Crandall, V. C. Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Digman, J. M. Principal dimensions of child personality as inferred from teacher's judgments. Child Development, 1963, 34, 43–60.Google Scholar
  9. Dweck, C. S., & Bush, E. S. Sex differences in learned helplessness: I. Differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators. Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, 147–156.Google Scholar
  10. Dweck, C. S., Davison, W., Nelson, S., & Enna, B. Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and II. An experimental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 268–276.Google Scholar
  11. Dweck, C. S., & Gilliard, D. Expectancy statements as determinants of reactions to failure: Sex differences in persistance and expectancy change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 1077–1084.Google Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H. Sex differences in influenceability. Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 75, 86–116.Google Scholar
  13. Etaugh, C., & Harlow, H. School attitudes and performance of elementary school children as related to teacher's sex and behavior. In E. Biophy & T. J. Good (Eds.), Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Etaugh, C., & Hughes, V. Teacher evaluations of sex-typed behaviors in children: The role of teacher, sex and school setting. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 394–395.Google Scholar
  15. Feather, N. T. The relationship of persistence at a task to expectation of success and achievement-related motives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 63, 552–561.Google Scholar
  16. Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. Attribution of responsibility and valence of outcome in relation to initial confidence and success and failure of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 173–188.Google Scholar
  17. Freedman, J. L., Carlsmith, J. M., & Sears, D. O. Social psychology, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
  18. Hill, K. T., & Dusek, J. B. Children's achievement expectations as a function of social reinforcement, sex of subject, and test anxiety. Child Development, 1969, 40, 547–557.Google Scholar
  19. House, W. C., & Penrney, V. Valence of expected and unexpected outcomes as a function of locus of control and type of expectancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 454–463.Google Scholar
  20. Jacobson, L. I., Berger, S. E., & Millham, J. Individual differences in cheating during a temptation period when confronting failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 15, 48–56.Google Scholar
  21. Julian, J. W., Regula, C. R., & Hollander, E. P. Effects of prior agreement by others on task confidence and conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 9, 171–178.Google Scholar
  22. Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. Praise, involvement and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 53, 383–390.Google Scholar
  23. Lenney, E. Women's self confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 1–13.Google Scholar
  24. Lewinsohn, P. M., Mischel, W., Chaplin, W., & Barton, R. Social competence and depression: The role of illusory self-perceptions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1980, 89, 203–212.Google Scholar
  25. Lippitt, R., & Gold, M. Classroom social structure and a mental health problem. Journal of Social Issues, 1959, 15, 40–49.Google Scholar
  26. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, D. J., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. Illusion of control for self and others in depressed and nondepressed college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46, 125–136.Google Scholar
  28. McMahon, I. D. Relationships between causal attributions and expectancy of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 28, 108–114.Google Scholar
  29. Meyer, W., & Thompson, G. Sex differences in the distribution of teacher approval and disapproval among sixth-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1956, 47, 385–395.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, J. B. Toward a new psychology of women. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  31. Minuchin, P. P., & Shapiro, E. K. The school as a context for social development. In P. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 4, 4th ed., New York: Wiley, 1983.Google Scholar
  32. Nicholls, J. G. Causal attribution and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 379–389.Google Scholar
  33. Parsons, T. Family structure and socialization of the child. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family: Socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar
  34. Rehm, L. P. A self-control model of depression. In J. C. Coyne (Ed.), Essential Papers on Depression. New York: New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  35. Stevenson, H. W., Hale, G. A., Klein, R. E., & Miller, L. K. Interrelations and correlates in children's learning and problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1968, 33(7, Serial No. 123).Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 103, 193–210.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomi-Ann Roberts
    • 1
  • Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStanford UniversityStanford

Personalised recommendations