Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multivariate investigation of perceptual attributions concerning gender appropriateness in language

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two stimulus tapes were created to manipulate male and female communicators' use of task and socioemotional behavior, pronunciation of-ing word endings, interruptions, amount of words, pitch, and intonation. To determine the source of perceptual attributions to male and female communicators, this study compared subjects' perceptions of male and female communicators who use gender-appropriate language features with perceptions of the same male and female communicators who use gender-inappropriate language features. Results indicate that regardless of whether they are used by a male or female communicator, “female” language features consistently contribute to the communicator's credibility; a communicator, regardless of gender, who uses “male” language features is consistently perceived as more extroverted. It was concluded that (1) communicators are differentially perceived as a consequence of linguistic features in their messages, rather than as a consequence of mere identification of source gender; (2) one's language should not be restricted by traditional sex-role prescriptions, but should be guided by situational appropriateness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashen, F. Speech variation among Negroes in a small Southern community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1969.

  • Argyle, M., Laljee, M., & Cook, M. The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad. Human Relations, 1968, 21, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armor, D. J. Theta reliability and factor scaling. In H. L. Costner (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. E., Jr. Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62, 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, N. Sex-typed language: The production of grammatical cases. Acta Sociologica, 1971, 14, 24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. Academic women. University Park: Penn State University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. The sex game. New York: Atheneum, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bochner, A. P., & Kelly, C. W. Interpersonal competence: Rationale, philosophy, and implementation of a conceptual framework. Speech Teacher, 1974, 23, 279–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brend, R. M. Male-female intonation patterns in American English. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1971, Hague: Mouton, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. H., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P., & Vogel, S. R. Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1970, 34, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current apparisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, W., & Smith, D. R. Communication patterns, sex, and length of verbalization in speech of four-year-old children. Speech Monographs, 1973, 40, 310–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, J., & Tiffany, W. Phonetics: Theory and application to speech improvement. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, N. F. Toward a feminist analysis of linguistic behavior. University of Michigan Papers in Women's Studies, 1974, 1, 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, D. M., & Johnson, J. E. Relationship between sex-role identification and self-esteem in early adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 1970, 3, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, B. L., & Crouch, I. The question of tag-questions in women's speech: They don't really use more of them, do they? Language in Society, 1975, 4, 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. Fundamental frequency characteristics of adolescent females. Language and Speech, 1970, 13, 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eble, C. C. How the speech of some is more equal than others. Paper presented at Southeastern Conference on Linguistics, 1972.

  • Fairbanks, G., Herbert, E., & Hammond, M. An accoustical study of vocal pitch in seven- and eight-year-old girls. Child Development, 1949, 20, 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, G., Wiley, J., & Lassman, F. An accoustical study of vocal pitch in seven- and eight-year-old boys. Child Development, 1949, 20, 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasold, R. W. A sociological study of the pronunciation of three vowels in Detroit speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, mimeographed, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, P. C. Toward a paradigm of effective communication: An empirical study of perceived communication effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1976.

  • Finn, J. Multivariance. Chicago: National Education Resources, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. L. Social influence on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word, 1958, 14, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P. Interaction: The work women do. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, 1975.

  • Flexner, S. Preface. In H. Wentworth, & S. Flexner (Eds.), Dictionary of American slang. New York: Crowell, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, M. D., Hobby, A. K., & Craik, K. H. Non-linguistic factors in oral language productivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 29, 871–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, H. M., & Summers, C. S. Sex differences in the use of hostile verbs. Journal of Psychology, 1970, 76, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginet, S. M. Linguistic behavior and the double standard. Paper presented at the Conference of Intercultural Communication, Binghampton, N.Y., 1974.

  • Gump, J. P. Sex-role attitudes and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, L. Female-male differences in conversational interaction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1973.

  • Hirschman, L. Analysis of supportive and assertive behavior in conversations. Paper presented at the meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1974.

  • Housel, T. J., & McDermott, P. J. The perceived credibility and persuasiveness of a message source as affected by initial credibility, style of language, and sex of source. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Portland, 1976.

  • Jespersen, O. L. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: Allen & Unwin, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. Check one: Male, female. Psychology Today, 1969, 3; 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, W. F. Observational studies of husband-wife interaction in family decision-making. In M. Sussman (Ed.). Sourcebook in marriage and the family. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963, Pp. 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, J. mentioned in “In other words.” Chicago Sun-Times, May 7, 1972.

  • Key, M. R. Linguistic behavior of male and female. Linguistics, 1972, 88, 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, M. R. Male/female language. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. Samples from English culture (Vol. 1). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. Blue-collar marriage. New York: Vintage, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Folklinguistics. Psychology Today, 1974, 8, 82–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, C. Female and male perceptions of female and male speech. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, 1975.

  • Labov, W. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. Language and women's place. Language in Society, 1973, 2, 45–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. You are what you say. Ms., 1974, 3, 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, C. National differences in conversations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1927, 21, 354–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, M. H., & Burtt, H. E. A study of conversations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1924, 4, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J., Jr. Speech variation in a Piedmont community: Postvocalic “r.” In S. Lieberson (Ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics. Hague: Mouton, 1966. Pp. 76–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. M. Infant speech. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunneborg, P. W. Stereotypic aspects in masculinity-feminity measurement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry, E. A. Female-male interaction in unstructured small group settings. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association convention, 1976.

  • Parker, A. M. Sex differences in classroom intellectual argumentation. Unpublished master's thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1973.

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. Family, socialization, and interaction process. New York: Free Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei, M. Words in sheep's clothing. New York: Hawthorne, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D. M. A comparative study of the intonation characteristics of young adult males and females. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, 1975.

  • Roget, P. The original Roget's thesaurus of English words and phrases. , 1965.

  • Rosenkrantz, P. S., Vogel, S. R., Bee, H. Broverman, I. K., & Broverman, D. M. Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubble, D. N., & Higgins, E. T. Effects of group sex composition on self-presentation and sex-typing. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, N. A. Bibliographic annual in speech communication. New York: Speech Communication Association, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy, R. W. Sex as a factor in sociolinguistic research. Paper presented at Anthropological Society of Washington, 1969. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 027 522)

  • Shuy, R. W., Wolfram, W. A., & Riley, W. K. Linguistic correlates of social stratification in Detroit speech. In N. Henley & B. Thorne (Eds.), She said/he said: An annotated bibliography of sex differences in language, speech, and nonverbal communication. Pittsburgh: Know, Inc., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedicor, J. C. Studies in the pitch and duration characteristics of superior speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of Iowa, 1940.

  • Snedicor, J. C. The pitch and duration characteristics of superior female speakers during oral reading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1951, 16, 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskin, W. F., & John, V. P. The study of spontaneous talk, In R. Barker (Ed.), The stream of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L. Husband-wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociological Review, 1951, 16, 468–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., James, R. R., & Hawkins, C. Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 1957, 22, 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., & Mann, R. D. Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 1956, 19, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swacker, M. The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Differences and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, B., & Henley, N. Difference and dominance: An overview of language, gender, and society. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Differences and dominance. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkova, R. Development of speech intonation in infants during the first two years of life. In Ferguson & Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill, P. Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1972, 1, 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, R. K., & Chase, L. J. Factor analysis in human communication research. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, 1975,

  • Vogel, S. R., Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Maternal employment and perception of sex-roles among college students. Development Psychology, 1970, 3, 384–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Raffler Engle, W. The development from sound to phoneme in children's language. In Ferguson & Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, R. Some questions on the child's learning of phonology. In Smith & Miller (Eds.), The genesis of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemann, J. M. Explication and text of a model of communication competence. Human Communication Research, 1977, 3, 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, W. A. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. M. The influence of sex and knowledge of communication effectiveness on spontaneous speech. Word, 1966, 22, 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Differences and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, Speech, and Theater, University of Cincinnati, USA

    Cynthia L. Berryman-Fink

  2. School of Speech Communication, Bowling Green State University, USA

    James R. Wilcox

Authors
  1. Cynthia L. Berryman-Fink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James R. Wilcox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berryman-Fink, C.L., Wilcox, J.R. A multivariate investigation of perceptual attributions concerning gender appropriateness in language. Sex Roles 9, 663–681 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289796

Keywords

Search

Navigation