Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceptions of single and multiple incident rape

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation focused on impressions of single and multiple incident rape victims. College as well as non-college male and female samples reported their perceptions of a rape victim who was raped for the first time or who experienced a prior rape 1, 3, or 8 years previously. Half of the fictional victims with prior rape histories were described as having reported and half as not having reported the earlier incident. No differences in perceptions were related to initial or repeat victimization. Attempts to ward off realization of vulnerability to victimization were offered as explanations for differences in male and female observers' perceptions. College and non-college sample differences in observers' perceptions were discussed in terms of differences in living experience. Caution seems warranted in estimating the general public's perceptions of rape victims from assessments based on college student samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, L. G., Selby, J. W., & Warring, L. J. (1976). Social perception of the victim's causal role in rape: An exploratory examination of four factors. Human Relations, 29, 517–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Selby, J. W. (1979). Attributing responsibility to the victim of rape: Influence of information regarding past sexual experience. Human Relations, 32, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., & Lewis, D. (1977). Rape: The price of coercive sexuality. Toronto, Canada: The Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. J., & Roth, S. (1987). The psychological aftermath of rape: Long-term effects and individual differences in recovery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 525–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. M., Atkeson, B. M., & Calhoun, K. S. (1982). An examination of differences between multiple and single incident victims of sexual assault. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, E. P. Dammann, E. J., & Heilig, K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19, 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanakar, S., Pinto, N. J. P., & Mazumdar, D. (1985). Causal and moral responsibility of victims of rape and robbery. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 622–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krulewitz, J. E. (1982). Reactions to rape victims: Effects of rape circumstances, victim's emotional response, and sex of helper. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 645–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krulewitz, J. E., & Nash, J. E. (1979). Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observer on attributions about rape. Journal of Personality, 47, 557–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCahill, T. W., Meyer, L. C., & Fischman, A. M. (1979). The aftermath of rape. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Moeller, D., Kaufman, A., Divasto, P., Pathak, D., & Christy, J. (1978). Recidivism among sex assault victims. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 1103–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, V. M., & Randall, S. C. (1982). The impact of investigator perceptions of victim legitimacy on the processing of rape/sexual assault cases. Symbolic Interaction, 5, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schult, D. G., & Schneider, L. J. (1991). The role of provocativeness, rape history, and observer sex in attributions of blame in sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scroggs, J. R. (1976). Penalties for rape as a function of victim provocativeness, damage, and resistance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 360–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., Keating, J. P., Hester, R. K., & Mitchell, H. E. (1976). Role and justice considerations in the attribution of responsibility to a rape victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, University of North Texas, NT Box 13587, 76203, Denton, Texas

    Lawrence J. Schneider

Authors
  1. Lawrence J. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This investigation was supported by a grant from the University of North Texas Organized Faculty Research Fund. Special thanks are extended to the Legal Services Department of the Dallas/Ft. Worth International Airport for their assistance and to Jack Haynes for assistance in the data analysis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, L.J. Perceptions of single and multiple incident rape. Sex Roles 26, 97–108 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289752

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289752

Keywords

Search

Navigation