Skip to main content

Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities

Abstract

Explanations of sex-related differences in spatial ability emphasizing the role of sex-differentiated experience have not been supported by direct measurement of spatial activities during adolescence, the period when these differences seem to increase. The present research involved development of a scale to measure the spatial experience of adolescents and adults. In Study 1, a list, as complete as possible of adolescent activities was compiled and given to undergraduate judges for ratings of involvement of spatial skills and sex-typing. Judges also indicated whether they had participated in each activity. Activities considered spatial by 75% or more of the judges were used to develop a spatial experience questionnaire. Judgments of the spatial nature of tasks were positively correlated with judged masculinity and with greater male than female participation. In Study 2, participation in spatial activities by undergraduates was correlated with spatial ability as measured by the Differential Aptitude Test. The activity questionnaire should prove useful in studying the development of spatial ability in adolescents and adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. Differential Aptitude Test (5th ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, S. A., Lane, D. M., & Dratt, L. M. Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., & Maxwell, S. E. Individual differences in cognitive abilities. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 30). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, J. M., & Serbin, L. A. Behaviorally based masculine- and feminine-activity-preference scales for preschoolers: Correlates with other classroom behaviors and cognitive tests. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1411–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, J. M., Serbin, L. A., & Schackman, M. Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test. Child Development, 1978, 49, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droege, R. C. Sex differences in aptitude maturation during high school. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1967, 14, 407–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C., David, F. B., Dailey, J. T., Shaycroft, M. F., Orr, D. B., Goldberg, I., & Neyman, C. A., Jr. Project Talent: The identification, development, and utilization of human talents. Pittsburgh: Project Talent Office, University of Pittsburgh, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A. Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. J. Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical function of the brain. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. J. Sex-related variations in spatial skill. In L. S. Liben, A. H. Patterson, & N. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the life span: Theory and application. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., Geiringer, E. R., & Yen, W. M. On the empirical relation between spatial ability and sex differences in other aspects of cognitive performance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1975, 10, 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, W., & Signorella, M. L. Sex-typing and spatial ability: The association between masculinity and success on Piaget's water-level task. Sex Roles, 1980, 6, 345–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J. Sex differences in the complexity of children's play and games. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munroe, R. L., & Munroe, R. H. Effect of environmental experience on spatial ability in an East African Society. Journal of Social Psychology, 1971, 83, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, S. C. The relationship among sex-role stereotyping, sex-role preferences, and the sex difference in spatial visualization. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, S. B., Munroe, R. H., & Munroe, R. L. Effect of environmental experience on spatial ability: A replication. Journal of Social Psychology, 1971, 84, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. A critique of cross-lagged correlation. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saegert, S., & Hart, R. The development of environmental competence in girls and boys. In M. Salter (Ed.), Play: Anthropological perspectives. Cornwall, N.Y.: Leisure Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L. A., & Connor, J. M. Sex-typing of children's play preferences and patterns of cognitive performance. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1979, 134, 315–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. A. Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. Sex differences in the correlations among field dependence, spatial ability, sex-role orientation, and performance on Piaget's water-level task. Developmental Psychology, 1978, 14, 689–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G. Sources of variation in performance on spaital tasks In J. Eliot & N. J. Salkind (Eds.), Children's spatial development. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. Spatial ability: A critical review of the sex-linked major gene hypothesis. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. A., & Petersen, A. C. (Eds.). Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning. New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newcombe, N., Bandura, M.M. & Taylor, D.G. Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles 9, 377–386 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289672

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289672

Keywords