Abstract
Managers in a large corporation evaluated application materials representing one of eight hypothetical job candidates. In order to examine the effects of two types of information on sex bias, three factors were manipulated in a factorial design: (1) Applicants were either male or female engineers; (2) they appeared highly competent or moderately competent based on academic performance; (3) they were applying for an engineering job that entailed either technical engineering tasks or managerial tasks in addition to the technical tasks. Greater discrimination against women occurred in evaluations for the technical-managerial job, even with highly competent applicants. These results are explained in terms of ambiguity: Because it was not obvious that applicants would succeed on the additional managerial tasks, the evaluators resorted to stereotypes in order to make their predictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beattie, M. Y., & Diehl, L. A. Effects of social conditions on the expression of sex-role stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1979, 4, 241–255.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.
Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. Sexism and “beautyism” in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 301–310.
Clifford, M. M., & Looft, W. R. Academic employment interviews: Effect of sex and race. Educational Research, 1971, 22, 6–8.
Cohen, S. L., & Bunker, K. A. Subtle effects of sex role stereotypes on recruiter's hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 566–572.
Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D., & Terpstra, D. E. Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 288–294.
Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 39–43.
Dipboye, R. L., & Wiley, J. W. Reactions of male raters to interviewee self-presentation style and sex: Extensions of previous research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1978, 13, 192–203.
Fidell, L. S. Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 1094–1098.
Frieze, I. H., Parsons, J. E. Johnson, P. B., Ruble, D. N., & Zellman, G. L. Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective. New York: Norton, 1978.
Gerdes, E. P., & Kelman, J. H. Sex discrimination: Effects of sex-role incongruence, evaluator sex, and stereotypes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1981, 2, 219–226.
Kiesler, S. B. Actuarial prejudice toward women and its implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975, 5, 201–206.
Levinson, R. M. Sex discrimination and employment practices: An experiment with unconventional job inquiries. Social Problems, 1975, 22, 533–543.
Massengill, D., & Di Marco, N Sex-role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics: A current replication. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 561–570.
Muchinsky, P. M., & Harris, S. L. The effect of applicant sex and scholastic standing on the evaluation of job applicant resumes in sex-typed occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1977, 11, 95–108.
Piacente, B. S., Penner, L. A., Hawkins, H. L., & Cohen, S. L. Evaluation of the performance of experimenters as a function of their sex and competence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974, 4, 321–329.
Renwick, P. A., & Tosi, H. The effects of sex, marital status, and educational background on selection decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 93–103.
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. Effects of applicant's sex and difficulty of job on evaluation of candidates for managerial positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 511–512. (a)
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. Influence of sex role stereotypes on personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 9–14. (b)
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. Sex role stereotyping in the executive suite. Harvard Business Review, 1974, 52(2), 45–58. (c)
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. The psychological basis for sex role stereotypes: A note on Terborg and Ilgen's conclusions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 14, 151–153.
Rosen, B., & Jerdee, T. H. Perceived sex differences in managerially relevant characteristics. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 837–843.
Schein, V. E. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 57, 95–100.
Sharp, C., & Post, R. Evaluation of male and female applicants for sex-congruent and sex-incongruent jobs. Sex Roles, 1980, 6, 391–401.
Shaw, E. A. Differential impact of negative stereotyping on employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 333–338.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
Terborg, J. R. Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 647–664.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1979.
U.S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau, Wage and Labor Standards Administration. Facts about women's absenteeism and labor turnover. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1969.
U.S. Department of Labor, Women's Bureau, Employment Standards and Administration. The myth and the reality (Women's Bureau Report WB 71-113). Washington, D.C.: Author, 1971.
Walster, E., Cleary, T. A., & Clifford, M. M. The effects of race and sex on college admission. Sociology of Education, 1970, 44, 237–244.
Wiener, Y., & Schneiderman, M. L. Use of job information as a criterion in employment decisions of interviewers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 699–704.
Zikmund, W. G., Hitt, M. A., & Pickens, B. A. Influence of sex and scholastic performance on reactions to job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 252–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Douglas Garber is now with Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerdes, E.P., Garber, D.M. Sex bias in hiring: Effects of job demands and applicant competence. Sex Roles 9, 307–319 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289666
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289666