Abstract
Historically, women have been less likely than men to support nuclear energy. Following this literature, we hypothesize that this gender gap results from concerns over safety factors and/or lower awareness of the issues. We study the differences in perceptions between men and women toward the operation of a local nuclear plant during a wave of public protest. Our analysis suggests that gender differences in safety concerns explains the gender gap in attitudes toward opening the local nuclear plant and provides a partial explanation of the gender gap in the perception of general nuclear power technology. Awareness levels have no significant effect on the gender gap. We suggest that the gender gap can be traced to women's propensity to rationally process negative information about nuclear power.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. American couples. New York: Morrow Publishers, 1983.
Bradburn, N. Response effects. In P. Rossi, J. Wright, & A. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1983.
Brody, C. J. Nuclear power: Sex differences in public opinion. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1981.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 42A, 3307A.
Brody, C. J. Differences by sex in support for nuclear power. Social Forces, 1984, 63(1), 209–228.
Chodorow, N. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.
CBS News Poll. The New York Times, July 26, 1986, I:4.
Cowan, R. S. From Virginia Dare to Virginia Slims: Women and technology in American life. Technology and Culture, 1979, 20, 51–63.
Gallup Poll. The Gallup Poll: Public opinion 1980. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1981.
Gallup Poll. The Gallup Poll: Public opinion 1986. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1987.
Griffin, S. Women and nature: The roaring inside her. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
Hoban, T., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Risman, B. Public opinion about nuclear power: Risk assessment and evacuation behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Association for Public Opinion Research. Raleigh, NC, April 1988.
Jasper, J. The political life cycle of technological controversies. Social Forces, 1988, 67, 357–377.
Ladd, A., Hood, T., & Van Liere, K. Ideological themes in the antinuclear movement: Consensus and diversity. Sociological Inquiry, 1983, 53, 252–272.
McStay, J., & Dunlap, R. Male-female differences in concern for environment quality. International Journal of Women's Studies, 1983, 6, 291–301.
Mazur, A. Media influences on public attitudes toward nuclear power. In W. R. Freudenburg & E. A. Rosa (Eds.), Public reactions toward nuclear power: Are there critical masses? Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1984.
Melber, B. D., Nealey, S. M., Hammersla, J., & Rankin, W. L. Nuclear power and the public: Analysis of collected survey research. Seattle, WA: Batelle Memorial Institutes, 1977.
Mitchell, R. C. Rationality and irrationality in the public's perception of nuclear power. In W. R. Freudenburg & E. A. Rosa (Eds.), Public reactions toward nuclear power: Are there critical masses? Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1984.
Nealey, S. M., Melber, B., & Rankin, W. Public opinion and nuclear energy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1983.
Nelson, L. Promise her anything: The nuclear industry's agenda for women. Feminist Studies, 1984, 10, 291–314.
Passino, E. M., & Lounsbury, J. Sex differences in opposition to and support for construction of a proposed nuclear power plant. In P. Suedfeld & J. Russell (Eds.), The behavioral basis of design, Book 1: Selected papers, Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchison, & Ross, 1976.
Reed, J. H., & Wilkes, J. M. Sex and attitudes toward nuclear power. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York City, August 1980.
Reynolds, H. T. The analysis of cross-classifications. New York: The Free Press, 1977.
Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1989.
Rothman, B. K. The tentative pregnancy: Parental diagnosis and the future of motherhood. New York: Viking, 1986.
Schuman, H., & Presser, S. The assessment of “no-opinion” in attitude surveys. In K. Schuessler (Ed.), Sociological methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.
Wertz, D. C., Sorenson, J. R., & Herren, T. C. Clients' interpretation of risk provided in genetic counseling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solomon, L.S., Tomaskovic-Devey, D. & Risman, B.J. The gender gap and nuclear power: Attitudes in a politicized environment. Sex Roles 21, 401–414 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289599
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289599