Skip to main content
Log in

The gender gap and nuclear power: Attitudes in a politicized environment

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historically, women have been less likely than men to support nuclear energy. Following this literature, we hypothesize that this gender gap results from concerns over safety factors and/or lower awareness of the issues. We study the differences in perceptions between men and women toward the operation of a local nuclear plant during a wave of public protest. Our analysis suggests that gender differences in safety concerns explains the gender gap in attitudes toward opening the local nuclear plant and provides a partial explanation of the gender gap in the perception of general nuclear power technology. Awareness levels have no significant effect on the gender gap. We suggest that the gender gap can be traced to women's propensity to rationally process negative information about nuclear power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. American couples. New York: Morrow Publishers, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. Response effects. In P. Rossi, J. Wright, & A. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, C. J. Nuclear power: Sex differences in public opinion. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1981.) Dissertation Abstracts International, 42A, 3307A.

  • Brody, C. J. Differences by sex in support for nuclear power. Social Forces, 1984, 63(1), 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS News Poll. The New York Times, July 26, 1986, I:4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. From Virginia Dare to Virginia Slims: Women and technology in American life. Technology and Culture, 1979, 20, 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll. The Gallup Poll: Public opinion 1980. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll. The Gallup Poll: Public opinion 1986. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. Women and nature: The roaring inside her. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, T., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Risman, B. Public opinion about nuclear power: Risk assessment and evacuation behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Association for Public Opinion Research. Raleigh, NC, April 1988.

  • Jasper, J. The political life cycle of technological controversies. Social Forces, 1988, 67, 357–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, A., Hood, T., & Van Liere, K. Ideological themes in the antinuclear movement: Consensus and diversity. Sociological Inquiry, 1983, 53, 252–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • McStay, J., & Dunlap, R. Male-female differences in concern for environment quality. International Journal of Women's Studies, 1983, 6, 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. Media influences on public attitudes toward nuclear power. In W. R. Freudenburg & E. A. Rosa (Eds.), Public reactions toward nuclear power: Are there critical masses? Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melber, B. D., Nealey, S. M., Hammersla, J., & Rankin, W. L. Nuclear power and the public: Analysis of collected survey research. Seattle, WA: Batelle Memorial Institutes, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. Rationality and irrationality in the public's perception of nuclear power. In W. R. Freudenburg & E. A. Rosa (Eds.), Public reactions toward nuclear power: Are there critical masses? Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealey, S. M., Melber, B., & Rankin, W. Public opinion and nuclear energy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. Promise her anything: The nuclear industry's agenda for women. Feminist Studies, 1984, 10, 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passino, E. M., & Lounsbury, J. Sex differences in opposition to and support for construction of a proposed nuclear power plant. In P. Suedfeld & J. Russell (Eds.), The behavioral basis of design, Book 1: Selected papers, Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchison, & Ross, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. H., & Wilkes, J. M. Sex and attitudes toward nuclear power. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York City, August 1980.

  • Reynolds, H. T. The analysis of cross-classifications. New York: The Free Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, B. K. The tentative pregnancy: Parental diagnosis and the future of motherhood. New York: Viking, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., & Presser, S. The assessment of “no-opinion” in attitude surveys. In K. Schuessler (Ed.), Sociological methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, D. C., Sorenson, J. R., & Herren, T. C. Clients' interpretation of risk provided in genetic counseling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, 1985.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solomon, L.S., Tomaskovic-Devey, D. & Risman, B.J. The gender gap and nuclear power: Attitudes in a politicized environment. Sex Roles 21, 401–414 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289599

Keywords

Navigation