Abstract
Seventy-two men and 86 women read vignettes describing five coercive strategies for obtaining sexual intercourse on a date. Subjects rated the acceptability of strategies used by male and female initiators for couples who were or were not sexually intimate. Subjects generally rejected all tactics. Results revealed a continuum of increasing rejection from verbal pressure and sexual stimulation, followed by mock force, followed by intoxication and physical force. Although women were more rejecting of any strategy than were men, women were slightly less opposed to verbal pressure and stimulation for “more sex” rather than for “first-time sex.” Women equally rejected most male- and female-initiated strategies, but men were more accepting of female-initiated strategies. Results are explained in terms of sex role norms prescribing that men be initiators and women be gatekeepers in sexual interaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.
Ageton, S. S. (1988). Vulnerability to sexual assault. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.) Rape and Sexual Assault II. New York: Garland.
Burt, M. R., & Albin, R. S. (1981). Rape myths, rape definitions, and probability of conviction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 212–230.
Cassell, C. (1988). Swept away: Why women fear their own sexuality. New York: Simon & Shuster.
Christopher, F. S. (1988). An initial investigation into a continuum of premarital sexual pressure. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 255–266.
Dietz, S. R., Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10, 261–280.
Doyle, J. A. (1989). The male experience (2nd ed.), Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
Fischer, G. J. (1989). College students attitudes toward forcible date rape: I. Cognitive predictors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 457–466.
Garcia, L., Milano, L., & Quijano, A. (1989). Perceptions of coercive sexual behavior by males and females. Sex Roles, 21, 569–577.
Goodchilds, J. D., Zellman, G. L., Johnson, P. B., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.) Rape and sexual assault II. New York: Garland.
Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer's attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875–895.
Johnson, J. D., & Jackson, L. A., (1988). Assessing the effects of factors that might underlie the differential perception of acquaintance and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 19, 37–45.
Krulewitz, J., & Payne, E. J. (1978). Attributions about rape: Effects of rapist force, observer sex and sex role attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 291–305.
Lott, B. (1987). Women's lives. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
Margolin, L. (1990). Gender and the stolen kiss: The social support of male and female to violate a partner's sexual consent in a noncoercive situation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 281–291.
Margolin, L., Miller, M., & Moran, P. B. (1989). When a kiss is not just a kiss: Relating violations of consent in kissing to rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 20, 231–243.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1986, June). “Real men don't say no”: Do men have sex when they don't want to? Paper presented at the annual midcontinent meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Madison, WI.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.
Muehlenhard, C. L., Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M. (1985). Is date rape justifiable: The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 297–310.
Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689–701.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1985). SAS user's guide: Basics, Version 5 edition. Cary, NC: Author.
Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220–232.
Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112.
Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–240.
Zilbergeld, B. (1978). Male sexuality. New York: Bantam Books and Little, Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Struckman-Johnson, D., Struckman-Johnson, C. Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strategies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy. Sex Roles 25, 661–676 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289570
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289570