Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 72, Issue 4, pp 503–512 | Cite as

Nature of heterosis and combining ability in the silkworm

  • V. A. Strunnikov


The isogenic, highly heterotic parthenoclone 29, originating from a hybrid silkworm female, was transformed via unisexual reproduction (meiotic and ameiotic parthenogenesis) into four genotypical variants differing in well-known various levels of hetero zygosity and combinations of useful and harmful genes. A comparison of these changes with the heterosis level made it possible to discover that both heterosity for adaptively neutral genes (overdominance hypothesis) and the number of allelic pairs, each of them being heterozygous for a favourable, completely dominant gene (dominance hypothesis) play no decisive role in the intensity of heterosis. The level of heterosis is largely determined by the relationship between the effects of useful and harmful genes, the first falling into the category of semidominant, cumulatively acting genes which control viability. Their favourable, joint well-coordinated effects, unlike those of genes which control quantitative characters, increase in relation to the number of genes in a geometric rather than an arithmetic progression. The interaction between semilethal genes is subjected to the same regularity. The high combining ability of parthenoclone 29 variants is determined by the number and homozygosity of the useful genes.

Key words

Heterosis Combining ability Partheno genesis Silkworm 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astaurov BL (1978) Selection for predisposition towards thermal parthenogenesis and production of silkworm parthenoclones improved for this character (in Russian). Genetika 9:93–106Google Scholar
  2. Maresin VM, Stepanova NL, Strunnikov VA (1985) Effect of selection of Drosophila melanogaster for combination ability at the background of the action of dominant semilethal (in Russian). Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 281:1455–1458Google Scholar
  3. Richey FD (1927) The convergent improvement of selfed lines of corn. Am Nat 61:430–449Google Scholar
  4. Ruban VTs (1983) Experimental production of autotetraploids in mulberry silkworm (in Russian). Genetika 19:115–120Google Scholar
  5. Ruban VTs (1983) Genetic correction of silkworm ameiotic parthenoclones by means of successive polyploidization and depolyploidization (in Russian). Genetika 19:108–114Google Scholar
  6. Strunnikov VA (1974) Initiation of the compensating gene complex is one of causes of heterosis (in Russian). Zh Obshch Biol 35:666–677Google Scholar
  7. Strunnikov VA, Lezhenko SS, Stepanova NL (1982) Genetically identical copies of the mulberry silkworm. Theor Appl Genet 63:307–315Google Scholar
  8. Strunnikov VA (1983) New hypothesis of heterosis: its scientific and practical significance (in Russian). Vestn Skh Nauki (Moscow) 1 (316):34–40Google Scholar
  9. Strunnikov VA, Stepanova NL, Terskaya ER, Ruban VTs (1980) Depolyploidization of silkworm tetraploids (in Russian) Genetika 16:1096–1108Google Scholar
  10. Strunnikov VA, Lezhenko SS, Stepanova NL (1983) Cloning of mulberry silkworm (in Russian). Genetika 19:82–94Google Scholar
  11. Terskaya ER, Strunnikov VA (1975) Artificial meiotic parthenogenesis in mulberry silkworm (in Russian). Genetika 11:54–67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Strunnikov
    • 1
  1. 1.N. K. Koltsov Institute of Developmental BiologyAcademy of Sciences of the USSRMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations