Skip to main content
Log in

Size of place and community attachment: A reconsideration

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The literature on community attachment is briefly reviewed, and the dichotomization of theoretical perspectives into ‘linear development’ and ‘systemic’ approaches is brought into question. It is argued that recent evidence on the deterioration of U.S. metropolitan areas and the emergence of net urban-to-rural migration casts doubt on the exhaustiveness of the ‘linear development’ and ‘systemic’ perspectives and warrants an empirical reconsideration of the relationship between size of place and community attachment. Rural residence proves to be positively related to dependent measures of community attachment in a 1974 statewide Wisconsin survey. Measures of ‘participatory’ attachment to the community, however, are not strongly correlated with community attachment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Babchuck, A., and N., Booth: 1969, ‘Voluntary association membership: a longitudinal analysis’, American Sociological Review 34, pp. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, C. L.: 1975, The Revival of Population Growth in Nonmetropolitan America (Economic Development Division, ERS-USDA, ERS-605, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. and O. D., Duncan: 1967, The American Occupational Structure (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M.: 1974, The Limits of the City (Harper Colophon, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, G. F. and R. R., Sell: 1977, ‘Population redistribution, migration, and residential preferences’, Annals 429, pp. 130–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. and K. R., Tremblay Jr.: 1977, ‘The quality of life in rural America’, Annals 429, pp. 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D. R.: 1952, ‘Scale for measuring community solidarity’, Rural Sociology 17, pp. 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S.: 1976, The Urban Experience (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S.: 1973, ‘On urban alienations and anomie’, American Sociological Review 38, pp. 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuguitt, G. V. and J. J., Zuiches: 1975, ‘Residential preferences and population redistribution’, Demography 12, pp. 491–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasarda, J. D. and M., Janowitz: 1974, ‘Community attachment in mass society’, American Sociological Review 39, pp. 328–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M.: 1951, The Community Press in an Urban Setting (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W. and W., Rodgers: 1975, ‘Toward an understanding of community satisfaction’, in A., Hawley and V., Rock (eds.), Metropolitan America in Contemporary Perspective (Halsted Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S.: 1970, ‘The experience of living in cities’, Science 167, pp. 1461–1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, N. H. et al.: 1975, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L.: 1964, ‘Urbanism as a way of life’, in A. J., Reiss (ed.), Louis Wirth on Cities and Social Life (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buttel, F.H., Martinson, O.B. & Wilkening, E.A. Size of place and community attachment: A reconsideration. Soc Indic Res 6, 475–485 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289440

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289440

Keywords

Navigation