Abstract
The application of subjective social indicators to evaluating local governmental services poses problems of interpretation and analysis. For several reasons, higher levels of subjective performance do not necessarily imply that in any other sense service performance is higher. Therefore, it may be erroneous to interpret an indicator such as expressed citizen satisfaction with a service as a measure of the quality of service government actually provides. Comparisons of average satisfaction levels can be especially misleading, as several simple simulation examples illustrate. This paper discusses some of the techniques and assumptions necessary for dealing with these problems, and offers some recommendations for using subjective indicators in local policy analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Andrews, Frank M., and Stephen B., Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being in America (Plenum, New York).
Anton, Thomas J. and Bruce Bowen: 1976, Toward a Clarification of Citizen ‘Satisfaction’ with Metropolitan Public Services, Discussion Paper No. 95 (Institute of Public Policy Studies, The University of Michigan).
Campbell, Angus, Philip E., Converse, and Willard L., Rodgers: 1976, The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage, New York).
Converse, Philip E.: 1975, ‘Public opinion and voting behavior’, in Fred I., Greenstein and Nelson W., Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.), pp. 75–169.
Converse, Philip E.: 1970, ‘Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue, in Edward R., Tufte (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.), pp. 168–189.
Hatry, Harry P., Richard E., Winnie, and Donald M., Fisk: 1973, Practical Program Evaluation for State and Local Government Officials (Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.).
Kelling, George L., Tony, Pate, Duane, Dieckman, and Charles E., Brown: 1976, The Kansas City preventive patrol experiment: A summary report, in Gene V., Glass (ed.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual (Sage, Beverly Hills), pp. 605–657.
Marans, Robert W. and Willard, Rodgers: 1975, ‘Toward an understanding of community satisfaction’, in A., Hawley and V., Rock (eds.), Metropolitan American in Contemporary Perspective (Wiley, New York), pp. 299–352.
Schuman, Howard and Barry, Gruenberg: 1972, ‘Dissatisfaction with city services: Is race an important factor?’, in Harlan, Hahn (ed.), People and Politics in Urban Society (Sage, Beverly Hills), pp. 369–392.
Shin, Doh C.: 1977, ‘The quality of municipal service: Concept, measure and results’, Social Indicators Research 4, pp. 207–229.
Stipak, Brian: 1977, ‘Attitudes and belief systems concerning urban services’, Public Opinion Quarterly 41, pp. 41–55.
Stipak, Brian: 1976, Citizen Evaluations of Urban Services as Performance Indicators in Local Policy Analysis, Ph.D. dissertation (University of California, Los Angeles).
U.I. and I.C.M.A.: 1974, Measuring the Effectiveness of Basic Municipal Services, Initial report of the Urban Institute and International City Management Association (Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.).
Webb, Kenneth and Harry P., Hatry: 1973, Obtaining Citizen Feedback: the Application of Citizen Surveys to Local Governments (Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stipak, B. Are there sensible ways to analyze and use subjective indicators of urban service quality?. Soc Indic Res 6, 421–438 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289436
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289436