Abstract
The contents of 800 singles ads were examined. They were compared by the gender of the advertiser, the year of appearance (1991 and 1986), and the SES of the target readership (affluent and general). There were very few advertisers who listed themselves as black, so these ads were not included in the study. Gender differences were most important. Men were more likely to offer financial security and seek attractiveness. Women were more likely to offer attractiveness and seek financial security. The gender differences were in agreement with those reported for over a decade and from many geographical areas, although less than half of the advertisers mentioned either finances or attractiveness. Contrary to our hypotheses, the contents of mens' and womens' ads were more different in 1991 than they had been in 1986 and more in conformity with sexual stereotypes. Ads in a paper with an affluent readership were more likely to mention educational and financial status while ads in a paper with a readership throughout the metropolitan area were more likely to mention physical characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop, Y., Feinberg, S., & Holland, P. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bolig, R., Stein, P. J., & McKenry, P. C. (1984). The self-advertisement approach to dating: Male-female differences. Family Relations, 33, 587–592.
Cameron, C., Oskamp, S., & Sparks, W. (1977). Courtship American style: Newspaper ads. The Family Coordinator, 26, 27–30.
Davis, S. (1990). Men as success objects and women as sex objects: A study of personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 23, 43–50.
Deaux, K., & Hanna, R. (1984). Courtship in the personals column: The influence of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 11, 363–375.
Harrison, A. A., & Saeed, L. (1977). Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 257–264.
Hassebrauck, M. (1990). Wer sucht wen? Eine inhaltsanalytische untersuchung von heirats-und bekanntschaftsanzeigen. / Who looks for whom? A content analytical investigation of lonely heart advertisements. Zeitschrift-fur-Sozialpsychologie, 21, 101–112.
Hirschman, E. C. (1987). People as products: Analysis of a complex marketing exchange. Journal of Marketing, 51, 98–108.
Koestner, R., & Wheeler, L. (1988). Self-presentation in personal advertisements: The influence of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 149–160.
Melton, W., & Thomas, D. L. (1976). Instrumental and expressive values in mate selection of black and white college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 509–517.
Montini, T., & Ovrebro, B. (1990). Personal relationship ads: An informal balancing act. Sociological Perspectives, 33, 327–339.
Murty, K. R., & Ranga-Rao, A. B. S. V. (1984). A sociological analysis of the content in matrimonial advertisements in South India. Indian Journal of Social Work, 44, 377–386.
Peres, Y., Meivar, H. (1986). Self-presentation during courtship: A content analysis of classified advertisements in Israel. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 17, 19–32.
Sitton, S. & Rippee, E. T. (1986). Women still want marriage: Sex differences in lonely hearts advertisements. Psychological Reports, 58, 257–258.
Smith, J. E., Waldorf, V. A., & Trembath, D. L. (1990). “Single white male looking for thin, very attractive ...” Sex Roles 23, 675–685.
Sutcliff, J. P. (1957). A general method of analysis of frequency data for multiple classification designs. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 134–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willis, F.N., Carlson, R.A. Singles ads: Gender, social class, and time. Sex Roles 29, 387–404 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289431
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289431