Abstract
A sample of 152 men and 152 women (mostly Caucasian) rated their reactions to a vignette in which the subjects were to imagine receiving an uninvited genital touch from a college acquaintance. The vignette was varied so that the acquaintance was of the opposite or the same gender as the subject, and the touch was either gentle or forceful. Results indicated that women anticipated strong negative effects from receiving opposite- or same-gender touch, whether gentle or forceful. Men anticipated almost no negative effects from either a gentle or forceful touch from a female acquaintance, but expected strong negative effects from a gentle or forceful touch from a male acquaintance. Regression analyses revealed that women's reactions to opposite-gender touch were mediated by beliefs in a male norm promoting casual sex, and feelings of violation and fear of harm. Men's reactions to opposite-gender touch were influenced by feelings related to sexual arousal. Men and women's reactions to same-gender touch were related to feelings of violation and harm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christopher, F. S. (1988). An initial investigation into a continuum of premarital sexual pressure. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 255–266.
Garcia, L., Milano, L., & Quijano, A. (1989). Perceptions of coercive sexual behavior by males and females. Sex Roles, 21, 569–577.
Goodchilds, J. D., Zellman, G. L., Johnson, P. B., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault II. New York: Garland.
Goyer, P. F., & Eddelman, H. D. (1984). Same-sex rape of nonincarcerated men. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 576–579.
Johnson, R. L., & Shrier, D. (1987). Past sexual victimization by females of male patients in an adolescent medicine clinic population. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 650–652.
Kanin, E. J., & Parcell, S. R. (1977). Sexual aggression: A second look at the offended female. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 67–76.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.
Larsen, K. S., Reed, M., & Hoffman, S. (1980). Attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuality: A Likert-type scale and construct validity. Journal of Sex Research, 16, 245–257.
Lottes, I. I. (1991). The relationship between nontraditional gender roles and sexual coercion. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 89–109.
Margolin, L. (1990). Gender and the stolen kiss: The social support of male and female to violate a partner's sexual consent in a noncoercive situation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 281–291.
Mezey, G., & King, M. (1989). The effects of sexual assault on men: A survey of 22 victims. Psychological Medicine, 19, 205–209.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Long, P. L. (1988, November). Men's and women's experiences of coercive sexual intercourse: How are they pressured and how do they react? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, San Francisco, CA.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Quackenbush, D. M. (1988, November). Can the sexual double standard put women at risk for sexually transmitted disease? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, San Francisco, CA.
Musialowski, D. M., & Kelly, K. (1987, April). Male rape: Perception of the act and the victim. Paper presented at the Eastern Regional Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Philadelphia, PA.
Nelson, M. C. (1988). Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural comparisons for the simplified Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Sex Roles, 18, 289–296.
Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689–701.
Sarrel, P. M., & Masters, W. H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 117–131.
Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112.
Struckman-Johnson, C. J. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–240.
Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (in press). Pressured and forced sexual experiences among a sample of college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27, 85–100.
Struckman-Johnson, D. L., & Struckman-Johnson, C. J. (1991). Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strategies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy. Sex Roles, 25, 661–676.
Waterman, C. K., Dawson, L. J., & Bologna, M. J. (1989). Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 118–124.
Whitley, B. E. (1988). Sex differences in heterosexuals' attitudes toward homosexuals: It depends upon what you ask. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 287–291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D. College men's and women's reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level. Sex Roles 29, 371–385 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289430
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289430