Skip to main content
Log in

Sex role and developmental evaluations in the just world

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Just World Hypothesis indicates that individuals are evaluated in relation to the situation in which they are observed. This study examined the application of the equity relationship in Just World evaluations, and the extent of overt evaluative and covert behavioral sex-role-related biases. Males or females rewarded or punished and later rated members of the same or opposite sex who were seen in favorable or unfavorable circumstances. Subject—stimulus person dyad age (adult or 7 years old) was also varied. Results agreed with hypotheses derived from role, exchange, and developmental theory. As predicted, women used less equity than men, while both sexes tended to apply the equity relationship less in cross-sex pairs. Adults showed a covert discrimination favoring their own sex, while children showed a similar overt bias as well. Some suggestions are made for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Frieze, I. H. Attributions of success and failure for actors and observers. Journal of Research in Personality, 1976, 10, 256–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H. Causal attributions and information seeking to explain success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 1976, 10, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. L. Handling negative inputs: On the plausible equity formulae. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976, 12, 194–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. Sex differences in moral internalization and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 720–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby (Ed.), The development of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L., & Blackmore, J. Fair pay: Field investigations of the fair economic exchange. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1977, 81–85.

  • Larwood, L., O'Neal, E., & Brennan, P. Increasing the physical aggressiveness of women. Journal of Social Psychology, 1977, 101, 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L., & Wood, M. M. Women in management. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larwood, L., Zalkind, D., & Legault, J. The bank job: A field study of sexually discriminatory performance on a neutral role task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975, 5, 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. Observer's evaluation of a victim: Justice, guilt, and veridical perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. The justice motive: “Equity” and “parity” among children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 551–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. Observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J. C., & Christy, M. D. Achievement standards for contingent self-reinforcement: Effects of task length and task difficulty. Child Development, 1974, 45, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. Z., & Eisen, S. V. Achievements of male and female storybook characters as determinants of achievement behavior for boys and girls. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 467–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C. Bargaining and reciprocity. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, V. E. Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspirations in women. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 809–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. W. Occupational segregation: An alternative hypothesis, Journal of Contemporary Business, 1976, 5(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper Organization. The Virginia Slims American women's opinion poll (Vol. 3). New York: Roper Organization, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, D. Occupational rankings for men and women by earnings. Monthly Labor Review, 1974, 97, 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G. L., Quinn, R. P., & Shepard, L. J. Trends in occupational sex discrimination: 1969–1973. Industrial Relations, 1976, 15, 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, J. R., & Ilgen, D. R. A theoretical approach to sex discrimination in traditionally masculine occupations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, G. W. The Walster et al. (1973) equity formula: A correction. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1975, 6, 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. From each according to his abilities: The role of effort in a moral society. Human Development, 1973, 16, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., & Peter, N. A cognitive-developmental analysis of achievement and moral judgments. Developmental Psychology, 1973, 9, 290–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. M., & Greenfeld, S. T. Women managers and fear of success: A study in the field. Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larwood, L., Moely, B. Sex role and developmental evaluations in the just world. Sex Roles 5, 19–28 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289342

Keywords

Navigation