Kybernetik

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 30–39 | Cite as

A theory of biological pattern formation

  • A. Gierer
  • H. Meinhardt
Article

Abstract

One of the elementary processes in morphogenesis is the formation of a spatial pattern of tissue structures, starting from almost homogeneous tissue. It will be shown that relatively simple molecular mechanisms based on auto- and cross catalysis can account for a primary pattern of morphogens to determine pattern formation of the tissue. The theory is based on short range activation, long range inhibition, and a distinction between activator and inhibitor concentrations on one hand, and the densities of their sources on the other. While source density is expected to change slowly, e.g. as an effect of cell differentiation, the concentration of activators and inhibitors can change rapidly to establish the primary pattern; this results from auto- and cross catalytic effects on the sources, spreading by diffusion or other mechanisms, and degradation.

Employing an approximative equation, a criterium is derived for models, which lead to a striking pattern, starting from an even distribution of morphogens, and assuming a shallow source gradient. The polarity of the pattern depends on the direction of the source gradient, but can be rather independent of other features of source distribution. Models are proposed which explain size regulation (constant proportion of the parts of the pattern irrespective of total size). Depending on the choice of constants, aperiodic patterns, implying a one-to-one correlation between morphogen concentration and position in the tissue, or nearly periodic patterns can be obtained. The theory can be applied not only to multicellular tissues, but also to intracellular differentiation, e.g. of polar cells.

The theory permits various molecular interpretations. One of the simplest models involves bimolecular activation and monomolecular inhibition. Source gradients may be substituted by, or added to, sink gradients, e.g. of degrading enzymes. Inhibitors can be substituted by substances required for, and depleted by activation.

Sources may be either synthesizing systems or particulate structures releasing activators and inhibitors.

Calculations by computer are presented to exemplify the main features of the theory proposed. The theory is applied to quantitative data on hydra — a suitable one-dimensional model for pattern formation — and is shown to account for activation and inhibition of secondary head formation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barth,L.G.: The process of regeneration in hydroids. Biol. Rev. 15, 405–420(1940).Google Scholar
  2. Bode,H., Berking,S., David,C.N., Gierer,A., Schaller,H., Trenkner,E.: Quantitative analysis of cell types during growth and morphogenesis in hydra. Wilhelm Roux' Arch. (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Burnett,A. L.: A model of growth and cell differentiation in hydra. Amer. Naturalist. 100, 165–189 (1966).Google Scholar
  4. Child,C.M.: Patterns and problems of development, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1941.Google Scholar
  5. Crick,F.: Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 225, 420–422 (1970).Google Scholar
  6. Crick,F.: The scale of pattern formation. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 25, 429–438 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. Delbrück,M.: Discussion to paper by Sonnenborn and Beale. In: Unités biologiques douées de continuité genetique. C.N.R.S., Paris, 1949.Google Scholar
  8. Goodwin,B.C, Cohen,H.M.: A phase-shift model for the spatial and temporal organization of developing systems. J. theor. Biol. 25, 49–107 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. Hartline,H.K., Wagner,H.G., Ratliff,F.: Inhibition in the eye of limulus. J. gen. Physiol. 39, 651–673 (1956).Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence,P.A.: Gradients in the segment: the orientation of hairs in the milkweed bug oncopeltus fasciatus. J. exp. Biol. 44, 607–620 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. MacWilliams,H.K., Kafatos,F.C., Bossert, W.H.: The feedback inhibition of basal disk regeneration in hydra has a continuously variable intensity. Develop. Biol. 23, 380–398 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. Schaller,C.H.: Isolation and characterisation of low molecular weight substances activating head and bud formation in hydra. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Schaller,H., Gierer,A.: Distribution of the head activating substance in hydra and its location in membraneous particles in nerve cells. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Spiegelman,S.: Physiological competition as a regulatory mechanism in morphogenesis. Quant. Rev. Biol. 20, 121–146 (1945).Google Scholar
  15. Turing,A.: The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 237, 32(1952).Google Scholar
  16. Waddington, C.H.: Principles of embryology, on p. 417. New York: MacMillan Comp. 1962. The term “primary pattern” is introduced on p. 417.Google Scholar
  17. Webster,G., Wolpert,L.: Studies on pattern regulation in hydra. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 16, 91–104 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. Wilby,O.K., Webster,G.: Studies on the transmission of hypostome inhibition in hydra. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 24, 583–593 (1970).Google Scholar
  19. Wilby,O.K., Webster,G.: Experimental studies on axial polarity in hydra. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 24, 595–613 (1970).Google Scholar
  20. Wolpert,L.: Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. theor. Biol. 25, 1–47 (1969).Google Scholar
  21. Wolpert,L., Hicklin,J., Hornbruch,A.: Positional information and pattern regulation in regeneration of hydra. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 25, 391–415 (1971).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Gierer
    • 1
  • H. Meinhardt
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für VirusforschungTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations