Skip to main content
Log in

Gender roles in the experimental community: Rajneeshpuram

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined gender roles at the now disbanded commune of Rajneeshpuram in Eastern Oregon. The study was a multimethod, social-psychological research project. It was expected that community members would describe themselves as androgynous. Both men and women scored high on the Feminine scale of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire, and they rated their ideal partners as androgynous. The interviews indicated that women and men did not think of themselves as feminine or androgynous, but rather as “soft.” This concept of softness is not as affect laden as that of femininity, and hence was likely to attenuate the resistance to men becoming more feminine. It was further hypothesized that occupations would have an equal number of women and men. Strict equality was not found, but many occupations manifested more of a gender balance than is seen outside of the commune. In sharp contrast to other findings, femininity was highly correlated with self-esteem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amitabh, S. P. Shree Rajneesh ashram: A provocative community. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1982, 22, 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & DelBoca, F. K. Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 219–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backman, C. W. Interpersonal congruency theory revisited: A revision and extension. Unpublished manuscript. University of Nevada, Reno, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. Correlates of sex-typing in Fiji, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1985, 10, 429–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A. Gender stereotypes: Traditions and alternatives, 2nd ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Sex role adaptability: One consequences of psychological androgyny. In A. Kaplan & J. Bean (Ed.), Beyond sex role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs, 1983, 8, 598–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. Conceptions of sex-roles: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 512–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex role stereo types: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. O. The teachings of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh and their social, ethical and environmental implications. Report to the Oregon Committee for the Humanities. Salem, OR, September 27, 1983.

  • Cooke, R. A., & Rousseau, D. M. Stress and strain from family roles and work-role expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69, 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S., & Prohaska, T. The student as Pygmalion: Effect of student expections on the teacher. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71, 485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L. Leadership roles and gender stereotypes traits. Sex Roles, 1988, 18, 649–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. H. Art and illusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A. A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 1981, 5, 1097–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M. The working-class woman and recruitment propaganda during World War II: Class differences in the portrayal of war work. Signs, 1983, 8, 672–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, V. The awakened one: The life and work of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. Commitment and community: Communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (Ed.). Communes: Creating and managing the collective life. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to taken women. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82, 965–990. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books, 1977. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latkin, C., Hagan, R., Littman, R., & Sundberg, N. Who lives in utopia: A brief research report on the Rajneeshee project. Sociological Analysis, 1987, 48, 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science: Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1947, 1, 5–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P. W., & Jones, E. E. Polarized appraisals of outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 689–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, J. P., & Lavine, L. O. Sex-role stereotyping and patterns of self-disclosure. Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 403–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., & Butcher, J. Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 428–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, M. T. Review of Women in the Kibbutz. Sex Roles, 1977, 3, 606–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. C. Handbook of research design and social measurement. New York: Longman, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, H. Bhagwan: The god that failed. New York: St. Martin's, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, B. Life as laughter: Following Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, L., Slivken, K., Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Household responsibilities in middle-class couples: The contribution of demographic and personality variables. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, D. Sex-role contradictions: Self-perceptions and ideal perceptions. Sex Roles, 1984, 10, 651–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. A. Social values, femininity, and the development of female competence. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. Comment on Lubinski, Tellegen, and Butcher's “Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny,” viewed and assessed as distinct concepts. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 1983, 44, 440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. Masculinity and femininity: The psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. Comparison of masculine and feminine personality attributes and sex-role attitudes across age groups. Developmental Psychology, 1979, 15, 583–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1980, 5, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Sawin, L. L. Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In V. O'Leary, R. Unger, & B. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender and social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiger, L., & Shepher, J. Women in the kibbutz. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Baeyer, C. L., & Sherk, D. L., & Zanna, M. P. Impression management in the job interview: When the female applicant meets the male chauvinist interviewer. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981, 7, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. Ed. Sex roles in contemporary American communes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. Jr. Sex role orientation and self esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 765–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 1984, 12, 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. Masculinity, femininity and self-esteem: A multitrait analysis. Sex Roles, 1988, 18, 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1975, 11, 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank the Center for the Study of Women in Society at the University of Oregon for their financial support, and Melissa Katsikis, Richard Littman, and Norman Sundberg for their helpful comments and discussions of the issues raised here.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latkin, C.A. Gender roles in the experimental community: Rajneeshpuram. Sex Roles 21, 629–652 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289175

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289175

Keywords

Navigation