Abstract
In this study male and female subjects were given six vignettes depicting heterosexual interactions between acquaintances. The vignettes described sexual advances representing different points along a coerciveness continuum. The gender of the aggressor and the victim were varied. The subjects were then asked to indicate their perception of the degree of coerciveness involved. In addition, they were asked to attribute both positive and negative feelings to the victim. The results indicated that male subjects perceived these sexual advances as slightly more coercive when the victim was a female, whereas females perceived the advances as slightly more coercive when the victim was a male. Also, there was a tendency to view the low-coercion activities as more coercive when the males were the victim, whereas the opposite was true for the vignettes rated high on coercion, especially the one describing physical coercion. The attributions of positive and negative feelings tended to parallel the coerciveness ratings. Typically, the more coercive activity was seen as, the less positive feelings and more negative feelings the subjects attributed to the victim. The results were discussed in terms of stereotypical beliefs regarding the sexuality of males and females and attribution theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garcia, L. T. Sex role orientation and stereotypes about male-female sexuality. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 1982, 8, 863–887.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C., & Wisniewski, N. The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1987, 55, 162–170.
LaPlante, M., McCormick, N., & Brannigan, G. Living the sexual script: College students' views of influence in sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 1980, 16, 338–355.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1987, 34, 186–196.
Russell, D. E. Sexual exploitation: Rape, child abuse, and workplace harassment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1984.
Sandberg, G., Jackson, T. L., & Petretic-Jackson, P. College students' attitudes regarding sexual coercion and aggression: Developing educational and preventive strategies. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1987, 28, 302–311.
Scully, D., & Marolla, J. Convicted rapists' construction of reality: The denial of rape. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Convention, San Francisco, CA, September 1982.
Smith, R., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 1988, 24, 101–112.
Struckman-Johnson, C. Forced sex on dates: It happens to men too. Journal of Sex Research, 1988, 24, 234–240.
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Williams, L. The classic rape: When do victims report? Social Problems, 1984, 31, 459–467.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia, L., Milano, L. & Quijano, A. Perceptions of coercive sexual behavior by males and females. Sex Roles 21, 569–577 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289171
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289171